18 Apr 2024, 21:30 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 30 Jul 2018, 19:00 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/14/15 Posts: 218 Post Likes: +175
Aircraft: Piper Cheyenne II
|
|
With where the Cheyenne market has been lately I can't fathom buying a large cabin pressurized piston. Cheyenne will burn a little more $ per mile (but not much when lower cost for fuel and higher speed are factored in), everything else similar and far more reliability.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 30 Jul 2018, 20:59 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/31/13 Posts: 1235 Post Likes: +602 Company: Docking Drawer Location: KCCR
Aircraft: C425
|
|
Quote: https://www.controller.com/listings/air ... merlin-iib That is for sure a lot of airplane for the money. If you had someone with experience maintaining it nearby and a big enough hangar it would be hard to beat. Bargain them down to $325K and you have would a flying limousine for a little more than half what you'd pay for a cherry 421C. If you budgeted $40K in maintenance annually I think you'd be pleasantly surprised.
_________________ ATP, CFI-I, MEI http://www.dockingdrawer.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 07:21 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4573 Post Likes: +3298
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Many thanks to you guys
I’m leaning more towards the 421 after reading several comments.
Hanger space is expensive. I actually need two because I split my time between two homes. So yes that’s a concern
When traveling FBOs charge significantly more for TP vs Piston in fees and whatnot. Jet vs 100 LL prices? I haven’t seen a big difference Maybe a dollar. I know there are some fuel purchase programs do they really make a difference?
I came in to BCT today and plan on staying a week. Hanger was $150 night for the Baron. Im sure it’s double for a TP. That just takes all fun out of traveling.
I’m planning on flying 100 to 125 hrs a year. The cost of Phase checks vs Annuals maybe a concern when flying only a modest number of hours.
Stay tuned
AB The fuel cost spread is larger IMO than you think. A TPE powered aicraft will be very close to the same fuel cost as a C421. Where I fly the TPE is cheaper fuel cost.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 07:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/05/11 Posts: 9577 Post Likes: +6448 Company: Power/mation Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.controller.com/listings/aircraft/for-sale/18823657/1968-swearingen-sa26-at-merlin-iib
Here is your plane.
MFR maintenance program has no calendar items. TPE efficiency. Quite the proce spread on Merlins. Where does one go to learn up on the breed? What makes the older ones so cheap?
_________________ Be Nice
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 08:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 5587 Post Likes: +2546 Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The fuel cost spread is larger IMO than you think. A TPE powered aicraft will be very close to the same fuel cost as a C421. Where I fly the TPE is cheaper fuel cost.
You hit the nail on the head. A year ago, we replaced a corporate 421C with a 441. Our fuel costs on most flights over an hour went down. We found that on the longer flights we would make a stop for physiological needs with the 421C, where we go non-stop in the 441. Saving that climb (especially into the flight levels) saves a ton of fuel cost. I did two round-robin three leg charity trips a couple months ago, one in the 441, the same a week later in my Aerostar. Fuel cost was $30 more in the 441... It was a much easier trip in the 441! Jason
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 12:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 6944 Post Likes: +3601 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Makes sense. But someone still needs to buy that Merlin... Looks like it needs two (2) Hot Section *Inspections* in 350 hours, or find to replacement engines. That's a couple hundy... Merlin insurance is not as easy or inexpensive at C400 series (the Honda Accord of the fleet). Tj
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 13:00 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/31/13 Posts: 1235 Post Likes: +602 Company: Docking Drawer Location: KCCR
Aircraft: C425
|
|
Quote: Fuel is the cheapest part of the overall cost I wouldn't say that. It's actually the #2 cost behind maintenance in my case. I think the most accurate way to put it is that when switching to a turboprop, especially a TPE airplane, your overall fuel bill WILL NOT increase given the same amount of miles traveled. If your trips are in the 500nm range then you will most likely see a fuel savings even in a PT6 airplane depending on your local fuel prices and the spread between jetA and 100LL. The only time I see my fuel cost increase compared to my old airplane (twin commander 500B) is on very short trips such as 120nm or so.
_________________ ATP, CFI-I, MEI http://www.dockingdrawer.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 13:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/10/12 Posts: 6827 Post Likes: +7937 Company: Minister of Pith Location: Florida
Aircraft: Piper PA28/140
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Merlin insurance is not as easy or inexpensive a[s] C400 series (the Honda Accord of the fleet).
Tj
Isn't the Honda Accord the most stolen car?
_________________ "No comment until the time limit is up."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Can I operate a Conquest1on a 421 budget? Posted: 31 Jul 2018, 13:14 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/14/15 Posts: 218 Post Likes: +175
Aircraft: Piper Cheyenne II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Many thanks to you guys
I’m leaning more towards the 421 after reading several comments.
Hanger space is expensive. I actually need two because I split my time between two homes. So yes that’s a concern
When traveling FBOs charge significantly more for TP vs Piston in fees and whatnot. Jet vs 100 LL prices? I haven’t seen a big difference Maybe a dollar. I know there are some fuel purchase programs do they really make a difference?
I came in to BCT today and plan on staying a week. Hanger was $150 night for the Baron. Im sure it’s double for a TP. That just takes all fun out of traveling.
I’m planning on flying 100 to 125 hrs a year. The cost of Phase checks vs Annuals maybe a concern when flying only a modest number of hours.
Stay tuned
AB True you'll pay more for hangar on the road than a Baron, but probably not much if any more than a 421. A $1.00 per gallon fuel difference is significant, especially when you also factor in the speed difference - per mile the gap closes dramatically. I have thirsty PT-6's, my block burn is 50% higher than my TIO-540's, but on average I am paying 25% less for fuel (you MUST get knowledgable of fuel contracts - you rarely pay retail), and I am traveling about 10% faster overall. Very small difference when it all shakes out.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|