14 May 2025, 16:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 06 May 2018, 20:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/11/10 Posts: 13015 Post Likes: +12633 Location: Indiana
Aircraft: Cessna 185, RV-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 1) Can live outside That means no fabric, though there are hundreds of fabric airplanes tied outside in Alaska, of all places. Quote: 2) Fits 6'3" me That eliminates the metal 2-seaters. Quote: 4) under $75K Piece of cake. This is a Cessna 170 mission! Or, keeping in the BT tradition of overspending other people's money, let me be the first to recommend a T-6.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 06 May 2018, 21:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/20/16 Posts: 7081 Post Likes: +9343 Location: Austin, TX area
Aircraft: OPA
|
|
Quote: Piece of cake.
This is a Cessna 170 mission! Or, keeping in the BT tradition of overspending other people's money, let me be the first to recommend a T-6. +1 (especially the T-6 part)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 06 May 2018, 21:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6467 Post Likes: +14126 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
Vfr fixed pitch RV-8
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 07 May 2018, 02:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/17/12 Posts: 615 Post Likes: +410 Location: Greensboro, NC
Aircraft: C170B, BE35, CRJ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've known many citabrias and champs that live outside, even in snowy climates.
Can you get a good 170 or 180 for 75k? You can get an outstanding, highly, modified 170 for $75K. You can get a really nice early 180 for $75K as well. Both are outstanding machines; the 180 is more capable, but the 170 (stock) is simpler. The 180 requires a bit “firmer” hand to fly and is not as light on the controls as a 170. Both are excellent cross country platforms, comfortable with great visibility. The 180 will be quicker, but for your mission, I doubt you’d see much difference between the two. They both do well on grass or pavement, and both are pretty good in a crosswind, but my nod goes to the 180 there. More mass, and (my perception) more powerful rudder and ailerons. Unless you’re looking for an excellent IFR platform, my bet would be a shiny 170 example, install ADS-B, and have the leftover funds for 1,000 hours’ worth of avgas. I think the larger panel of the 180 and constant speed prop make it a little more stable IFR machine, but it can and has been done in a 170. I love both airframes, but the 170 is my “first and last” airplane having grown up with it my entire life. I’m lucky to have access to an early model 180 and if I weren’t so damn attached to the 170, logically, I’d be all over a 1950s 180. It is a better airplane all around, but the 170 is a beautiful airframe and is a delight to fly. I wouldn’t get too mired in the different 170 models if you go that route. They all fly pretty similarly, though the B model is the most produced and by virtue of being the last iteration of the design, the most modern. There were differences between the B models as well; cowling design, panel layout, gear legs, cabin heat, tailwheel steering being the largest among them. That being said, with anything that old, they are generally imbued with the personality of previous caretakers for longer periods of time and you’ll find that very few are bone stock, fleet wide. Some have been repaired with parts from donor airframes of different year models, and others have simply been modified. I would look at a later through 1955 model for the better cowling/gear/panel/heater. If a VFR hamburger runner is your thing, nice A models can be had for less coin, and are all metal. The ‘48 has fabric wings and I would likely not want that outside long term. My own airplane is a 1952 B model. Same panel as the 1948-1951 (Art Deco piano keys; I love it), softer gear legs, smaller cabin heater manifold, barn door cowling (à la Bonanza or Cherokee) with different baffling, but has the same basic wing that Cessna produces on 172s today minus the electric flaps and LE cuff.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 07 May 2018, 04:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/14/11 Posts: 847 Post Likes: +601
|
|
For this mission... Cessna 170 - hands down... and thumbs up!  ($25-40K) Fits the requirements nicely, and won't eat you out of house and home. Lots of smiles per mile. ~ ME
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 07 May 2018, 07:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/10/13 Posts: 2371 Post Likes: +1815 Location: Lexington, KY
Aircraft: B95A Z526F SU26
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For extra credit, find a 170 that has the 180 hp Lycoming.  And polished! 
_________________ Steven Morgan ^middle name
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 07 May 2018, 08:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12804 Post Likes: +5254 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Vfr fixed pitch RV-8 Experimental ... I like it. What's a reasonable budget for such a machine with cosmetics that won't scare a layperson? Any particular reason you picked the 8? Is there a Neal Scwhartz of RV's
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: which taildragger... Posted: 07 May 2018, 08:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16096 Post Likes: +26977 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
second the RV, 7-8-9 any of them.
Join the vans web board and ask around for a ride and trial fit - you won't have a hard time finding someone willing to show you theirs
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|