28 Mar 2024, 07:25 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 00:16 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2299 Post Likes: +707 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
I can't say enough good things about my 850. Only thing I'd want different under the Xmas tree would be a 930!
Doubt that's gonna happen....more like a nice piece of coal this year!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 08:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/05/11 Posts: 9552 Post Likes: +6408 Company: Power/mation Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
|
|
Subscribed! I'm angling and scheming for a business case on a TP by 2022. A guy can dream, no?
_________________ Be Nice
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 10:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3302 Post Likes: +1424 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have the dual G600 and dual 750 install in my legacy TBM. I had a G1000 Perspective in my Cirrus (which I believe is the best G1000 installation of any airframe from what I've seen) and I prefer the G600/750 combo. I didn't think that I would and thought I was taking a step backwards but I have changed my mind. RVSM is now available for the dual G600 install and I'm taking my plane to Muncie next week to get it done. Really, being in the tops of clouds a number of times has been my only complaint and that will be largely fixed shortly. Tony, if given the choice ($$ aside), you would now choose the G600/750 over a G1000 bird??
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 14:52 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/13 Posts: 403 Post Likes: +246 Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
|
|
What structural changes did Socata make to raise the max gross weight from the 700B up to the 700C2? Did they beef up the airframe or pencil whip it?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 16:46 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6059 Post Likes: +702 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Upgraded the gears, mostly tires and wheels, more crash resistant seats, better seat belts I believe. Username Protected wrote: What structural changes did Socata make to raise the max gross weight from the 700B up to the 700C2? Did they beef up the airframe or pencil whip it?
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 21:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/11/13 Posts: 889 Post Likes: +697 Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: Malibu,Husky,TBM7C2
|
|
I have 350 hours in my C2 which I purchased w 2200 hours. Not expensive on maintenance but I bought mine just after a c+ inspection and new boots. Right after buying I did have to replace the AC (electric Honeywell) That was $23K. In 350 hours I have replaced a couple of circuit boards that I think fried when the AC died ($2k), a shimmy damper (non socata $1k) tires ($1K). The only other expense was a $5k annual. Oh yeah a couple of turbine washes at $500 total, $400 for a full detail and $50 bucks for O2. I re-died and repainted the seats myself because I could. I wash the plane myself. I have intentionally deferred maintenance on the Shadin trend recorder and have gone to manual mainly because its not that complicated and repair would be $5+k. My cup holder needs a new clip installed. (it's from a toyota celica, go figure) So far it has been cheaper to fly per mile than my Mirage was. My useful load is about 1100 full fuel which lets my bride bring anything she wants on trips. How they got to 1100 is PFM to me. Of course now she packs light
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 22:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8415 Post Likes: +8303 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have the dual G600 and dual 750 install in my legacy TBM. I had a G1000 Perspective in my Cirrus (which I believe is the best G1000 installation of any airframe from what I've seen) and I prefer the G600/750 combo. I didn't think that I would and thought I was taking a step backwards but I have changed my mind. RVSM is now available for the dual G600 install and I'm taking my plane to Muncie next week to get it done. Really, being in the tops of clouds a number of times has been my only complaint and that will be largely fixed shortly. Tony, if given the choice ($$ aside), you would now choose the G600/750 over a G1000 bird??
What I miss from the G1000 is the Garmin AP. It's superior to the Bendix King by a lot.
I'm pretty happy with the avionics I have. Were I to upgrade I wouldn't do it unless going to the 930.
_________________ Travel Air B4000, Waco UBF2,UMF3,YMF5, UPF7,YKS 6, Fairchild 24W, Cessna 120 Never enough!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 23:25 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/23/09 Posts: 2299 Post Likes: +707 Location: KIKK......Kankakee, Illinois
Aircraft: TBM 850
|
|
Tony...... had the 600/750 combo in my C2 as well. Yea.....actually really liked the set up. No doubt the 700 autopilot is much better. My Hendrix king really had a mind of its own.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 11 Dec 2017, 23:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8415 Post Likes: +8303 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Somewhere between Paul’s $5k annual and those who speak of a nightmarish $100k+ annual lies reality.
I think a 5k annual is not common but the $100k annual isn't either. There is an annual cycle that spreads out the inspections pretty well. But I can tell you that the 10 year mark is pretty expensive and to either be avoided or priced into the deal. The gear OH involves a lot more than actuators and is expensive and there is also the tail removal and a variety of component OH's due. That's all expensive but, as you do with a KA and its 6 year items you need to understand its coming and plan for it. Sometimes, if you don't keep a plane a long time you may not be the one to write the check but you pay for it just like with engine expense.
_________________ Travel Air B4000, Waco UBF2,UMF3,YMF5, UPF7,YKS 6, Fairchild 24W, Cessna 120 Never enough!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 01:54 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2572 Post Likes: +2329 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: 1993 Bonanza A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Upgraded the gears, mostly tires and wheels, more crash resistant seats, better seat belts I believe. The seat upgrades were to get an equivalent level of safety waiver allowing a stall speed, 65 kts., higher than the 61 kt. limit for single engine airplanes. From a FlyingMag review of the then-new 850: "In late 2002 the TBM engineers demonstrated to the FAA that new 20G crashworthy seats and other modifications delivered the equivalent level of safety as the 61-knot stall speed limit at a 65-knot stall at maximum takeoff weight. The FAA approved the new stall speed, which allowed an 816-pound takeoff weight increase in the 700C2 model that carries over to the new 850. As soon as fuel burns off, the TBM maximum stall speed will decrease and be below 61 knots for most of a typical flight, so the equivalent safety finding covers only a small worst-case corner of the envelope."
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 07:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/08/12 Posts: 12587 Post Likes: +5181 Company: Mayo Clinic Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nice, definitely my dream plane. And mine!
_________________ BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the TBM 850 Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 07:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/20/09 Posts: 673 Post Likes: +187 Location: KMMU / Morristown, NJ
Aircraft: Cheyenne (58P prior)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Tell us about baggage.
How many normal sized suitcases can you fit? How difficult to load with and without large door? How do ramp and hangar fees differ from, say, a King Air? Greg took the words out of my mouth! Where do you put bags if you have 2 or 3 people in the back seats? Most importantly, where can I put my golf clubs?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|