19 Apr 2024, 22:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 19 Jun 2021, 22:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/16/07 Posts: 17609 Post Likes: +21340 Company: Real Estate development Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
|
|
Yes, I wasn’t trying to be negative, just observing things may be different for a reason. Takes some getting used to. Single pilot, you obviously have all controls. Crewed, it’s normal for the Left seater to advance power then take hands off and put them on the yoke. Co-pilot adjusts throttles if power isn’t correct and guards them after rotation speed. On arrival, left seat would normally have power control, but may have been briefed differently for a lesson. As has been said, prop guys aren’t used to power to idle at 50 feet at Vref. A great number of the jet landing incidents are due to what I said above. The first thing I ask on a landing over run is we’re they at Vref at 50 feet.
_________________ Dave Siciliano, ATP
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 20 Jun 2021, 01:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt I will pay program for the entire life if the engine. Then you are okay with your plane and engines being worth zero, disposable. One of the lesser known policies of Williams is that if you do go off program ALL THE MONEY previously paid in is lost. You have to repay for all the hours to now again to get back on program. This can also happen if you fail to pay your invoices for 3 months as well. Your program is canceled and to get back on requires repaying previous hours. Quote: You are also ignoring the value of insurance for anything to go wrong. I'm not ignoring it at all. In 5 years, I will have $250K saved, at least, not paying Williams for 750 hours of engine use. That will fix just about anything that is wrong with a JT15D. Pay into an investment account like you would be paying Williams and see how far ahead you can get. Williams has a very high reputation for service, so the engine program is not that bad a deal. The main issue is the unilateral power they hold on everything in the contract. They can, and have, changed terms on renewals and there is nothing you can do about it. For example, contracts used to have increases tied to inflation indexes. Not any more, they are free to raise the rates every year to whatever price they want. Their program customers are absolutely captured in a way that exceeds any other arrangement I can think of, literally the entire value of your airplane is leverage. Quote: Also for me to fly to Cabo from Provo the Eagle II makes it no problem. Stallion not so much. If it does make it you are sweating for the last 45 min of the flight. Yes, there is a donut range where the Eagle II wins. It just isn't very big at the end of the day. When headwinds are strong, it is even smaller due to the Eagle II lower speed. For me, I had nothing in the donut, so the Stallion was faster to all my destinations. In the end, I simply couldn't commit to being a Williams slave and went for the V. Quote: You have exhaustively figured out what is best for you, thank you by the way as I learned a lot thru your process. And you are right. But your analysis does it apply to all. I never say my answer is right for all. All I ever do is say what my answer was and why it works for me. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 20 Jun 2021, 02:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/15/21 Posts: 2530 Post Likes: +1254
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Wow hold up. 10 day sim course? WTH??
If you can’t fly a plane in 3-5 days you should not be flying that plane. What the hell is so complicated about jets that it takes 10 days to learn to fly them? Or did that include a full Mechanics course so you can do your own phase inspections? LOL
Mike Although the systems in a 501 are not super-complicated by jet standards, they are considerably more complicated than what you'd find in a typical piston prop. In fact, I'm studying the 501 systems now to get a head start as I'd hate to have to cram that all in the first few days of a type rating course and then be tested on all that in a sim or in the air. Or a real-life emergency, for that matter. I recall seeing a video in which Joe Lara mentioned he spent 12 days at FSI getting his initial. Sobering to think how that turned out.
_________________ Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 20 Jun 2021, 07:24 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/17/21 Posts: 88 Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes, I wasn’t trying to be negative, just observing things may be different for a reason. Takes some getting used to. Single pilot, you obviously have all controls. Crewed, it’s normal for the Left seater to advance power then take hands off and put them on the yoke. Co-pilot adjusts throttles if power isn’t correct and guards them after rotation speed. On arrival, left seat would normally have power control, but may have been briefed differently for a lesson. As has been said, prop guys aren’t used to power to idle at 50 feet at Vref. A great number of the jet landing incidents are due to what I said above. The first thing I ask on a landing over run is we’re they at Vref at 50 feet. Besides the float on landing , taking your hands off the throttles & putting them on yoke on takeoff was another area hard to get used to coming from a turboprop.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 20 Jun 2021, 08:15 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 727 Post Likes: +340 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How many days did you spend? 13 days. 5 days ground school, 6 days sim, 1 day off, 1 day checkride. We were in a class with 9 students CE-500 initial at FSI Atlanta. They said it was the largest initial class size they have ever had. Sim was scheduled from 0600 to 0000 every day, My sim buddy and I were 2000-0000, so I got 2 hours of PIC, 2 hours of SIC every sim day. I felt like I could have done ground school and sim on the same days, and done more sim time each day. Mike C.
For sure. I did mine at sky blue 1 on 1. 6 days total. 2 days ground. 1 day sim. 2 days in airplane. Then ride. Had about 1400 tt with no TF time.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 20 Jun 2021, 08:28 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 727 Post Likes: +340 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ….. I doubt I will pay program for the entire life if the engine. So that point doesn’t hold with a guy like me.
Mike Highlighted an interesting art of your post above You’ve done homework on what off program does to the value of your plane? I kind of understood it was all or nothing, that a Williams anything ooff program was near zero
Pretty sure that what he meant was that he doesn't plan on keeping it for 30 years.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 20 Jun 2021, 09:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/23/11 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +128 Company: AWM Location: Houston Texas
Aircraft: Piper Meridan
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have in contract a 501SP Eagle II. Sold my 421 and really looking forward to the process of getting to be a jet pilot.
While I was researching this aircraft model again I went back thru this entire thread. Half way thru the thread I see myself from 2018 commenting on how great an Eagle II looks for me and my missions. But I was just not ready as a pilot. I did not have my MEL or any jet time. Since that post in 2018 I bought the 421 and got 400 hours in her. I know I am still a rookie at 1500TT and only 350 multi but I feel much more prepared than I was back in 2018. Great that the 2021 version of me is able to do what the 2018 version wanted to do back then. LOL
It's cool to see this thread come full circle for me. Lots of hours researching and considering what I want to do compared to what I should do.
Thanks to Michael T for not only starting this thread but helping me find the perfect 501SP for me.
Mike A 501 is 100 times easier to fly than your 421.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|