banner
banner

18 Apr 2024, 17:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 1769 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 118  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Apr 2018, 13:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/25/12
Posts: 3721
Post Likes: +3687
Location: KRHV San Jose, CA
Aircraft: A36, R44, C525
How has ownership been so far? The thread just seemed to have stopped.

_________________
Rocky Hill

Altitude is Everything.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 20 Apr 2018, 19:40 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4958
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Ownership is going great so far. I'm coming up on 5 months and 75+ hours. The plane is squawk free and hasn't had anything break since the initial few weeks of getting everything fixed. Next vacation/trip is to Mexico. It has really been everything I have expected it to be and I haven't had any surprises. I've prodded 2 other friends into getting a Klingon of their own and a third is getting close to buying one also. For the money, I don't think there is a better value in the jet market. If you had to use it everyday for business; it would eat you alive but for 75-100hrs a year, it's absolutely perfect. A friend said it perfectly, a "Klingon jet allows you to be a baller on a budget".

Worst thing that has occurred is a mouse crawled into the nose baggage from up the nose gear. He survived one low level flight but did not survive the subsequent poison and sticky trap. I've always practiced catch and release with mice until I saw one living in proximity to expensive wire bundles!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 09:17 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
If you had to use it everyday for business; it would eat you alive but for 75-100hrs a year, it's absolutely perfect.

It is usually the reverse as more hours amortize hangar, insurance, taxes, subscriptions, and calendar based maintenance over more flying hours.

What makes it more expensive to fly more such that using routinely in business isn't appropriate?

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 09:32 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4958
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Good point; the fixed costs and maintenance are incredibly low so it's all about he fuel. It burns more fuel than any other thing I've owned in my life so fuel is far and away the primary driver of when and where I take the Klingon. I got stuck down low going to/leaving Atlanta and it was a real eye opener how much gas I burned. No CAA or cheap self serve then I'm not going there. There's also a bit of effort involved with getting it out of the hangar and putting it to bed as it's a fairly large airplane. Likewise, it takes a little longer to get the bugs off the windows and wings. Not real complaints but just something to keep in mind. I had to learn how to operate a "real" tug; it's like driving a boat trailer with an extra point of pivot. It's a large machine to be the pilot/fuelman/line guy, etc. but totally doable if you are passionate about it.

These are wonderful anachronisms from a different era but due to the fuel burn it's going to be a delightful toy and not something I would suggest for a 300 hour a year business user.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 10:27 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1562
Post Likes: +1781
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
You say the fixed and MX costs are incredibly low. I was under the impression that the phase 1-5 and calendar inspections are what would eat someone alive. Can you enlighten me as to your thoughts on what’s going to be required both time and money wise over the next few years? Assume nothing unexpected.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 10:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 534
Post Likes: +255
Aircraft: eclipse
Back in the day when I was waiting for my Eclipse my instructor told me to just buy a citation.
I was interested until he told me to expect a 100k bill for an phase check :eek:

And that’s without issues


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 10:57 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4958
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
Back in the day when I was waiting for my Eclipse my instructor told me to just buy a citation.
I was interested until he told me to expect a 100k bill for an phase check :eek:

And that’s without issues


I directly know 4 former Eclipse owners that now own Citation 1SPs. All of us agree that is meaningfully less expensive to own a 1SP than an Eclipse. All of us agree that the Citation is significantly better built and more reliable than the Eclipse. The Eclipse is like a Siren that lures you in with low fuel costs but then kills you with probes, windshields, outflow valves, servos and broken computers. The number of people on the Eclipse forum with AOG issues lasting many months is incredibly scary. The Citation is brutally honest and says, "Hey, I burn a ton of fuel but that's about all I'm going to hassle you with".

Phase 1-4 is about $12K and Phase V is about 25K at a real shop. I'm sure you could bring a guy in on the side and do it cheaper. You can extend these significantly if you get on the Kevin Bacon program. Simple, robust systems that rarely break and it is easy to work on. 48 month inspections on the Eclipse are running about $40-50K.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 11:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 534
Post Likes: +255
Aircraft: eclipse
Michael
I am happy with my Eclipse and I am happy that you are happy with your airplane.

I am coming up on 10 years of ownership and it’s been a great ride.

Let’s see how long you enjoy your airplane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 17:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/31/17
Posts: 937
Post Likes: +540
Location: KADS
Aircraft: C560, C340
Username Protected wrote:
Back in the day when I was waiting for my Eclipse my instructor told me to just buy a citation.
I was interested until he told me to expect a 100k bill for an phase check :eek:

And that’s without issues


I directly know 4 former Eclipse owners that now own Citation 1SPs. All of us agree that is meaningfully less expensive to own a 1SP than an Eclipse. All of us agree that the Citation is significantly better built and more reliable than the Eclipse. The Eclipse is like a Siren that lures you in with low fuel costs but then kills you with probes, windshields, outflow valves, servos and broken computers. The number of people on the Eclipse forum with AOG issues lasting many months is incredibly scary. The Citation is brutally honest and says, "Hey, I burn a ton of fuel but that's about all I'm going to hassle you with".

Phase 1-4 is about $12K and Phase V is about 25K at a real shop. I'm sure you could bring a guy in on the side and do it cheaper. You can extend these significantly if you get on the Kevin Bacon program. Simple, robust systems that rarely break and it is easy to work on. 48 month inspections on the Eclipse are running about $40-50K.


We have been operating an Ultra for 11 years, last 2 on the Bacon program. I am still learning the prices on the Bacon program. On the old program I would budget 40K for a 1-4 and 80 to 90K for a 1-5. Those prices include all the repairs and parts they found during the inspections.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 18:15 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
not something I would suggest for a 300 hour a year business user.

Funny, that's exactly the profile of who I think CAN afford to use it.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 18:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/04/10
Posts: 3539
Post Likes: +3198
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
Username Protected wrote:
not something I would suggest for a 300 hour a year business user.

Funny, that's exactly the profile of who I think CAN afford to use it.

Mike C.

I was going to say the same thing. Not too that I can justify using the CJ for personal trips but have no problem with 300 hours/yr for business.
_________________
John Lockhart
Phoenix, AZ
Ridgway, CO


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 18:39 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4958
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
not something I would suggest for a 300 hour a year business user.

Funny, that's exactly the profile of who I think CAN afford to use it.

Mike C.


I don't think a serious business user would buy an old Klingon jet but maybe I'm wrong. Such a person would probably want something newer and wouldn't fly it and manage it himself. I have no need to operate this thing 300 hours a year. Most of my flying is recreational seaplane flying, a decent amount is Lancair flying alone and the rest is Klingon travel with my wife.

Maybe that's the point I'm trying to make: The ISP is a pretty good platform for someone to have as a second airplane and it's not going to murder you financially if you choose your missions for it.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 18:42 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4958
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Local Citation shop says they average 9-12K for a 1-4 and $20K for the average 1-5. I can live with these numbers.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 18:44 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4958
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Mike C.[/quote]
I was going to say the same thing. Not too that I can justify using the CJ for personal trips but have no problem with 300 hours/yr for business.[/quote]

There is a huge difference in paying with pre-tax or after tax dollars. The business vs. personal usage is a significant and often not talked about factor in operating costs.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 21 Apr 2018, 19:09 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5233
Post Likes: +3026
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Local Citation shop says they average 9-12K for a 1-4 and $20K for the average 1-5. I can live with these numbers.


When is your next 1-5 due?

_________________
Allen


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 1769 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 118  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.