banner
banner

20 Apr 2024, 12:27 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 1769 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 118  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 11:44 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The truth you can’t handle the truth

Tell me the dates you have been surveyed for your operating costs in these surveys.

If you say "none", I rest my case.

I've never met a person who has been asked to provide data to these supposed experts about their costs.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 11:46 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I strongly encourage this!! You are welcome to come fly mine anytime.

Excellent! Can you based it at KEVV for me? Thanks!

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 12:26 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The latest B&CA annual survey reports that an MU2 Solitaire costs $3.63 in direct cost per nautical mile on that same 600 nm trip.

Direct cost is fuel and maintenance (not hangar, insurance, taxes, etc).

$3.63 per nm for a 600 nm trip is $2,178.

That leg will take 2.2 hours (assuming still air) and burn ~170 gallons fuel. At $3.50/gallon, that is $595.

That leaves $1,583 for maintenance, or $720 per hour for maintenance.

Fails sanity check by a WIDE margin.

People who lack the basic mathematical and logical skills to detect these errors will believe these fake numbers.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 13:05 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1562
Post Likes: +1781
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
What’s the type rating cost for a citation 501sp? Quick search show 12-15k. Is the accurate?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 13:42 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What’s the type rating cost for a citation 501sp? Quick search show 12-15k. Is the accurate?

Depends on how you do it, your preparation, talent, and skill.

Simcom quoted me just over $12K, all in sim. I qualify for an all sim TC due to turbine hours I have in the MU2 (need 500 hours in turbines in same class, that is, multi engine land). It should be noted the $12K was at a discount for a returning customer (just did MU2 recurrent at Simcom in Feb). I think list is ~$18K.

There are quite a number of instructors who will do it in airplane and they will charge something less, but you have airplane operating costs to contend with, not to mention needed use of a Citation. Figure ~15 hours operation I would guess. My insurance agent said the underwriters favor the sim courses for TC.

I met an instructor at KSDL who said he had someone who was *40 hours* into their TC course, in airplane, and still not ready. The instructor had told the guy he wasn't jet material but the guy insisted on keep trying. The instructor is still doing it because he said he didn't want the guy finding someone else who would sign him off prematurely. Note the instructor had a flat fee, so this wasn't a money thing. Some people just do not have it, and that usually manifests itself in their lack of instrument skill and proficiency.

If you are considering flying a jet, the cost of the TC is relatively immaterial, maybe 10 hours operating cost if you get it in sim. Relatively speaking, the cost of your PPL to rent a $150/hour 172 was *WAY* higher.

PS: If you currently fly a turboprop, you can go get your turboprop recurrent at Simcom and the returning customer discount on the jet TC course essentially covers the recurrent or may be even more than the recurrent. So you get the turboprop recurrent for free, in effect.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 13:58 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4963
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
If you memorize the systems and can fly the ATP profiles it is very easy to do it in your own airplane 6-7k. Works for a proficient pilot but not going to work for someone that needs spoon feeding.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 16:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/01/11
Posts: 213
Post Likes: +106
Username Protected wrote:
People who lack the basic mathematical and logical skills to detect these errors will believe these fake numbers.

Conversely, people who lack basic research and reading skills are going to misunderstand any data they look at, and I think that's what happened to you. It appears you didn't read (or perhaps didn't understand) the B&CA methodology.

The methodology they employ utilizes a national fuel cost snapshot at the time of publication (2017). Thus their fuel cost is higher than what you probably pay with contract fuel. That, in turn, raises the fuel portion of the direct operating cost and lowers the maintenance portion.

The remaining maintenance portion of direct cost for the MU2 strikes me as still pretty high, but I assume that's only because it's an old plane with lots of old components that need expensive maintenance.

Those are the numbers. Feel free to find another balanced, impartial survey of a broad base of operators if you're not satisfied with B&CA's conclusions.

Ken


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 19:30 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Feel free to find another balanced, impartial survey of a broad base of operators if you're not satisfied with B&CA's conclusions.

"broad base of operators"?

I've yet to meet a SINGLE person who owns an MU2 who has been surveyed for B&CA numbers.

Please list the dates they have surveyed YOU for the Eclipse.

None you say?

Okay, please list the dates and serial numbers of other Eclipses they have surveyed.

Still none?

Okay, ANYBODY reading this thread, list the dates you have been surveyed for B&CA's cost analysis report.

<crickets>

Case closed. They aren't surveying us owner operators and maybe no one else at all and just making up the numbers.

Like many in today's society, you are guilty of putting faith in something because of how well it agrees with your views rather than the strength of the evidence and analysis behind it.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 19:32 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
If you memorize the systems and can fly the ATP profiles it is very easy to do it in your own airplane 6-7k.

I assume this is instructor costs only, airplane hours are another matter.

$6K buys about 5 hours of 501 time doing low altitude maneuvers, ain't no way that's enough to get a type rating and pay an instructor.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 19:53 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 13587
Post Likes: +10972
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
Feel free to find another balanced, impartial survey of a broad base of operators if you're not satisfied with B&CA's conclusions.

"broad base of operators"?

I've yet to meet a SINGLE person who owns an MU2 who has been surveyed for B&CA numbers.

Please list the dates they have surveyed YOU for the Eclipse.

None you say?

Okay, please list the dates and serial numbers of other Eclipses they have surveyed.

Still none?

Okay, ANYBODY reading this thread, list the dates you have been surveyed for B&CA's cost analysis report.

<crickets>

Case closed. They aren't surveying us owner operators and maybe no one else at all and just making up the numbers.

Like many in today's society, you are guilty of putting faith in something because of how well it agrees with your views rather than the strength of the evidence and analysis behind it.

Mike C.


Mike

I was surveyed at least six times in 8 years when I owned three turbine commanders. I was a member of NBAA.

Listing the dates is a pretty big ask as it was 10 years ago.

How much trouble do you want me to go through ?
_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 20:21 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4963
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
If you memorize the systems and can fly the ATP profiles it is very easy to do it in your own airplane 6-7k.

I assume this is instructor costs only, airplane hours are another matter.

$6K buys about 5 hours of 501 time doing low altitude maneuvers, ain't no way that's enough to get a type rating and pay an instructor.

Mike C.


Instructor 1,500
Dpe: $2,000
Fuel in your airplane is the rest

My type cost me around $6k

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 20:35 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4963
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
[/quote] $6K buys about 5 hours of 501 time doing low altitude maneuvers, ain't no way that's enough to get a type rating and pay an instructor.

Mike C.[/quote]

Mike, I'll give you the chance to take the Citation Challenge this weekend. Be in Florida on Friday morning and you will leave Sunday with a type rating for around $6K +/- $1,000. Obviously the weather is out of my control. Memorize the manual and systems this week.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 20:46 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 13587
Post Likes: +10972
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
$6K buys about 5 hours of 501 time doing low altitude maneuvers, ain't no way that's enough to get a type rating and pay an instructor.

Mike C.[/quote]

Mike, I'll give you the chance to take the Citation Challenge this weekend. Be in Florida on Friday morning and you will leave Sunday with a type rating for around $6K +/- $1,000. Obviously the weather is out of my control. Memorize the manual and systems this week.[/quote]

Why does the word memorize sound so...bad? Do you mean learn the systems? Pretty certain Mike isn’t a memorization kind of guy.

_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 20:53 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 4963
Post Likes: +4796
Aircraft: G44, C501, C55, R66
Username Protected wrote:
$6K buys about 5 hours of 501 time doing low altitude maneuvers, ain't no way that's enough to get a type rating and pay an instructor.

Mike C.


Mike, I'll give you the chance to take the Citation Challenge this weekend. Be in Florida on Friday morning and you will leave Sunday with a type rating for around $6K +/- $1,000. Obviously the weather is out of my control. Memorize the manual and systems this week.[/quote]

Why does the word memorize sound so...bad? Do you mean learn the systems? Pretty certain Mike isn’t a memorization kind of guy.[/quote]

The point is to get a type rating not learn how to fly the airplane. That's the business of most of the schools; study for the test. Taking a checkride has nothing to do with being a good pilot and lots of good pilots fail their checkride. Learning the airplane is best done with a mentor and some experience. Type Rating = License to Learn not a guarantee that you are safe and competent in the airplane.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 22 Apr 2018, 21:04 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/29/13
Posts: 13587
Post Likes: +10972
Company: Easy Ice, LLC
Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
Username Protected wrote:
The point is to get a type rating not learn how to fly the airplane. That's the business of most of the schools; study for the test. Taking a checkride has nothing to do with being a good pilot and lots of good pilots fail their checkride. Learning the airplane is best done with a mentor and some experience. Type Rating = License to Learn not a guarantee that you are safe and competent in the airplane.


I see. No futher questions. It all makes sense now. Thanks.

_________________
Mark Hangen
Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson)
Power of the Turbine
"Jet Elite"


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 1769 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 118  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.camguard.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.