15 May 2025, 17:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 17:44 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/29/13 Posts: 1084 Post Likes: +404 Location: KRMN
Aircraft: Baron 58P
|
|
Hi All, Perusing controller this afternoon as we all do (probably daily) getting my fill of plane porn and ran across this Mitsubishi Diamond 1A jet for <250K. https://www.controller.com/listings/air ... diamond-1aSo my question(s) is naturally what is wrong with this thing? --Is it impossibly expensive to upgrade avionics (if at all)? --Are you just buying the remaining engine times? --Does not list an AP---is there such thing as a Civilian GA Jet with no AP? --Is it just old? --Or are there a host of other issues potentially going on with this plane? Thought I would check in with those that have Jet experience to see what might be going on here. Money pit waiting to happen?? Thanks for all input!! Matt
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 18:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/23/08 Posts: 7357 Post Likes: +4086 Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx. Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
|
|
It has A/P. I have an SIC type rating  Only been in it a few times. Probably a great airplane at the right price. 2 pilots is always a pita in these older jets. Seemed like a fine airplane if perhaps a bit sluggish.
_________________ Tom Johnson-Az/Wy AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com C: 602-628-2701
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 18:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/20/14 Posts: 6732 Post Likes: +4938
Aircraft: V35
|
|
I think the time is ripe for a few flying clubs based on these older jets - especially older Citations that go for the same price range. I would guess there are Bonanza / Cirrus / Baron pilots would buy in to "live the dream" for 15 hours a year, taking a few hops with an appropriate "minder" in the right seat for insurance purposes. or am I 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 18:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/16/11 Posts: 6099 Post Likes: +8448 Company: Self Employed Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think the time is ripe for a few flying clubs based on these older jets - especially older Citations that go for the same price range. I would guess there are Bonanza / Cirrus / Baron pilots would buy in to "live the dream" for 15 hours a year, taking a few hops with an appropriate "minder" in the right seat for insurance purposes. or am I  That sounds like a good idea, and you most likely are  Anyone who is into flying is definitely 
_________________ Matt 336-266-3105
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 21:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/24/11 Posts: 605 Post Likes: +655
Aircraft: PA31, PA32R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's a great jet. Very similar to an early Beechjet, with a little less power. This plane does have an autopilot because it's RVSM. Maintenance isn't too bad and the engines are very common. It does require 2 pilots. I hear it's an easy plane to fly. This plane and the Beechjets would make a great single pilot plane, but the FAA thinks that if it weighs more than 12500 it needs another pilot.  Weight is not the issue. There are plenty of single-pilot jets over 12,500.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 22:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1359 Post Likes: +599
Aircraft: V35A, B300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's a great jet. Very similar to an early Beechjet, with a little less power. This plane does have an autopilot because it's RVSM. Maintenance isn't too bad and the engines are very common. It does require 2 pilots. I hear it's an easy plane to fly. This plane and the Beechjets would make a great single pilot plane, but the FAA thinks that if it weighs more than 12500 it needs another pilot.  Weight is not the issue. There are plenty of single-pilot jets over 12,500. King Air 350 weighs 15,000 and it’s single Pilot. Over 12,500 is when a type is required for an aircraft. Can be single pilot.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 23:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20005 Post Likes: +25057 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Weight is not the issue. There are plenty of single-pilot jets over 12,500. Not that were certified before the 1990s. Prior, above 12,500 lbs and turbojet meant part 25 which meant two pilot. Then, they invented part 23 "commuter category" which went to 19,000 lbs. Originally for turboprop commuters, it then got co-opted for light jets. Since then, just about every light jet under 19,000 lbs is far 23 commuter category and single pilot. The Diamond and Beechjet are part 25 two pilot just due to the accident of being developed before part 23 commuter category. Cessna was able to get an exemption for part 25 legacy Citations to allow single pilot operations, but that's a bit of weirdo thing that really shouldn't exist. Maybe someday that can be turned into something a bit more stable and normal than what we got so far. What is wrong with this jet? It is a Diamond that predates the Beech improvements. Otherwise, not much. Basically, if you got the pilots and money to fly a BJ 400, you'd buy one of those and not a Diamond. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 23:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/21/14 Posts: 287 Post Likes: +88 Location: KPDK
Aircraft: C421B MU2-40 Solitai
|
|
Weight is not the issue. There are plenty of single-pilot jets over 12,500.[/quote]
What single pilot jets are over 12,500?
It appears that this jet is being sold for the engine value.
_________________ Sandy
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 09 Apr 2018, 23:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20005 Post Likes: +25057 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What single pilot jets are over 12,500? CJ3, CJ3+, CJ4 Legacy Citations 550, S550, 560 with SPE 551SP (with STCs gross up kits that put it over 12,500 lbs) PC-24 Phenom 300 SJ-30 Quote: It appears that this jet is being sold for the engine value. For the older jets, this is basically the price for all of them. You buy engines and the rest of the package is just there to hold them off the ground. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 00:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/14/14 Posts: 1774 Post Likes: +2008 Company: Corporate Air Technology
Aircraft: Pa28-235
|
|
All of the above and about 3 gallons a minute of jet A assuming RVSM altitudes much more at lower altitudes,
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: What may be wrong with this Jet Posted: 10 Apr 2018, 00:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/09/11 Posts: 147 Post Likes: +54 Company: Ozark/TWA/American Location: St Louis, Mo
Aircraft: Be-58, Car Cub, RV8
|
|
Perfect starter jet. Two pilots not a pita. Safer and more enjoyable flying with another pilot. Only need one real, up to speed pilot. The SIC is very easy to acquire for most any instrument rated pilot. Insurance company may demand simulator training for co-pilot. Perfect way to get some jet experience. Our Diamond sold for $200K with 700 hours remaining. Potential throw away jet. My 2 cents. The Diamond would fly circles around a Cirrus Jet for 1.8 million less.
_________________ _____________________________ Jim N777SG BE-58 1H0
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|