19 Apr 2024, 06:46 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 14:44 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 10/05/09 Posts: 286 Post Likes: +130 Location: Portland, Oregon
Aircraft: MU-2F
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I fly out of 8000 + elevation runways with 1000 lbs of bags and passengers and climb straight to fl190 to smooth air cruising at 188 knots tas burning 18.3 Gph in my T210N. One of my passengers is 6’6 330 lbs and sits in the back seat comfortably with the middle seat removed. Don’t think any bonanza is remotely close to achieving that level performance or comfort. A Barrón might do it but at double the cost. you can do better, 185KTAS on 14.5gph LOP at FL190. Try 31"MP, 2300 RPM 14.5gph. This should give you at TIT in the 1570 range. Just my experience.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 14:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/11/10 Posts: 12403 Post Likes: +11412 Location: Indiana
Aircraft: Cessna 185, RV-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I fly out of 8000 + elevation runways with 1000 lbs of bags and passengers and climb straight to fl190 to smooth air cruising at 188 knots tas burning 18.3 Gph in my T210N. One of my passengers is 6’6 330 lbs and sits in the back seat comfortably with the middle seat removed. Don’t think any bonanza is remotely close to achieving that level performance or comfort. A Barrón might do it but at double the cost. What's your Bonanza experience?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 15:24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/27/08 Posts: 3175 Post Likes: +1261 Location: Galveston, TX
Aircraft: Malibu PA46-310P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I fly out of 8000 + elevation runways with 1000 lbs of bags and passengers and climb straight to fl190 to smooth air cruising at 188 knots tas burning 18.3 Gph in my T210N. One of my passengers is 6’6 330 lbs and sits in the back seat comfortably with the middle seat removed. Don’t think any bonanza is remotely close to achieving that level performance or comfort. A Barrón might do it but at double the cost. What's your Bonanza experience?
Can I guess? Using the words "not remotely close" is a bit much. They are both great airplanes.
My dentist had a T210 and always used to badmouth my Bonanza in very passive aggressive ways. He would always wait until both of his hands were in my mouth and I could not respond to his comments. I am glad that little prick retired, a takedown was imminent. Kevin
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 15:35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/13/07 Posts: 19859 Post Likes: +9569 Location: Seeley Lake, MT (23S)
Aircraft: 1964 Bonanza S35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can I guess? Using the words "not remotely close" is a bit much. Yes, small man syndrome. He forgets that when both aircraft have the same HP applied to them the Bo is always faster.
_________________ Want to go here?: https://tinyurl.com/FlyMT1
tinyurl.com/35som8p
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 17:01 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/12/15 Posts: 47 Post Likes: +24 Location: South Tx
Aircraft: Baron E55, c340,Pc12
|
|
It’s not a matter of being faster. It’s a matter of being capable to perform my mission. I fly a 491 Nm trip out of 8466 elevation runway with a load of 1580. You tell me what beach product can do that legally. By the way. I like the A36 and have flown them a lot. They fly like a dream. The only thing I don’t like is the sun on you face and the low useful load. I would never consider it for this trip though.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 18:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
This debate reminds me of the song: Sometimes there's one with big blue eyes, cute as a bunny, With hair down to here, and plenty of money, And just when you think she's that one in the world, Your heart gets stolen by some mousy little girl, And then you know you'd better make up your mind. And pick up on one and leave the other behind. It's not often easy and not often kind. Did you ever have to make up your mind? I've said it before and will again: TWO GREAT AIRPLANES. JG
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 18:45 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/13 Posts: 404 Post Likes: +247 Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
|
|
I have owned a B36TC and aT210N. 210 carries a lot more weight. In my opinion, the 210 is a much better turbo airplane. I have not flown a tn bonanza, just comparing the factory models.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 19 May 2018, 18:53 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 04/12/15 Posts: 47 Post Likes: +24 Location: South Tx
Aircraft: Baron E55, c340,Pc12
|
|
I have not but the ones I’ve look at on the market have a useful load of around 1220 so it would not do my mission.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 20 May 2018, 07:28 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/13 Posts: 404 Post Likes: +247 Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
|
|
The B36TC pilot’s good looking wife was waiting at the gate with the luggage he shipped ahead because he didn’t have enough useful load. The T210 was stuffed to the gills and looked like a clown car unloading all of its cr@p.
If you are skinny with few friends and don’t mind step climbing in the summer for CHTs- the B36TC wins hands down for style. Fat guys like me need the T210 for our passel of kids, dogs, and stuff.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 20 May 2018, 07:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Two guys arrive at their favorite 100 dollar burger joint and park on the ramp in front. One, in his B36TC and the other in his 210. The B36 guy opens the door and steps proudly out on the the wing and waves to the crowd while his adoring, smoking hot wife waits for him at the gate.
The other guy gets out of his Cessna. Mike, Now think about this. The $100 hamburger joint is somewhere besides where he lives, right? That might have been "somebody's" wife, but not his. That's called a "girlfriend". When I was a kid hanging around the airport, there was a drab looking Staggerwing kept there. The owner was from a town about 25 miles away. Some weekends, I'd ride out to the airport on my Moped and it would be gone. A few days later, it would show back up, but I never saw the owner. Finally, one of the adults told me the owner only used it to take trips with his girlfriend and kept it in Grenada so his wife wouldn't know. Does this mean that all Beech owners are cads? Jg
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 210 vs Bo AOPA Style Posted: 20 May 2018, 08:43 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/01/14 Posts: 2152 Post Likes: +1641 Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
|
|
I’ve a friend who’s wife has difficulty getting in and out of their Debby so he’s getting into a 210.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|