24 Apr 2024, 11:16 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 18 Oct 2017, 08:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just a long day. I did KJAC - KPWA - KDAY - KBED a couple weeks ago in about the same time and I was pretty tired. It's impressive how these airplanes can move around the country. I'd be more tired and annoyed doing it Commercial. My 2 goals in life are to avoid commitment and standing in line. The Pilatus gives me this.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 18 Oct 2017, 22:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 2899 Post Likes: +3608 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Could easily do that trip non-stop in the M600 as well, at normal cruise, or hit anywhere in the Continental US at reduced power 230 KTAS. Just have to use a smaller Lav (Travel John ) That's pretty impressive............weird looking map of America or am I just blind?
Kind of a weird way that the Jepp/Garmin displays the map when zoomed way out with Nexrad turned on. Should have zoomed the non-Nexrad map out
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 19 Oct 2017, 00:46 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/04/09 Posts: 352 Post Likes: +149
Aircraft: Dakota
|
|
Adam, we need a thread on the entire process of your 680V buying/fixing/refurbishing process with pix. I keep wondering what the deal-e-o is with that thing...
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 19 Oct 2017, 15:19 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/04/09 Posts: 352 Post Likes: +149
Aircraft: Dakota
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Adam, we need a thread on the entire process of your 680V buying/fixing/refurbishing process with pix. I keep wondering what the deal-e-o is with that thing... viewtopic.php?f=49&t=97688
Ahhh.... thanks Adam
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 21 Oct 2017, 12:01 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My 2 goals in life are to avoid commitment and standing in line. The Pilatus gives me this. So the PC12 means no woman will marry you? Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 21 Oct 2017, 19:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11105 Post Likes: +7090 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So the PC12 means no woman will marry you?
Mike C. Nah, I'm married to a hottie, must be something else........ I do know that some of the Mitts guys have similar trouble to Jason, which I'm sure is why you're looking at jets
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 22 Oct 2017, 00:04 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nah, I'm married to a hottie, must be something else........ You got the plane after the wedding, so not clear your case is on point. :-) Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 22 Oct 2017, 00:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11105 Post Likes: +7090 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nah, I'm married to a hottie, must be something else........ You got the plane after the wedding, so not clear your case is on point. :-) Mike C.
touche, she really liked my Mooney
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 22 Oct 2017, 00:52 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: touche, she really liked my Mooney :D "I thought you said you had money...." Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 22 Oct 2017, 04:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/18/12 Posts: 787 Post Likes: +399 Location: Europe
Aircraft: Aerostar 600A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: touche, she really liked my Mooney "I thought you said you had money...." Mike C.
_________________ A&P/IA P35 Aerostar 600A
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 08:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My 2 goals in life are to avoid commitment and standing in line. The Pilatus gives me this. So the PC12 means no woman will marry you? Mike C. Why would any man get married nowadays? The Ovary market has imploded and Variety is the spice of life.
My friend going through divorce right now is being forced to buy half his Pilatus from his wife. Ha
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 10:08 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why would any man get married nowadays? The Ovary market has imploded and Variety is the spice of life. Are you "in" at the "bottom" of the market? If your father thought this way, I suspect you wouldn't exist. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 10:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If your father thought this way, I suspect you wouldn't exist.
Mike C. I see your thoughts on marriage parallel your thoughts on the SF50. Times have changed. I have a 15 year old. You don't need marriage to have kids. I'll have another when my son goes to college. I may even move 2 in and have a baby with each.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Long range travel time/fuel burn comparison between mode Posted: 23 Oct 2017, 18:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11105 Post Likes: +7090 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'll have another when my son goes to college. I may even move 2 in and have a baby with each. I've read it all........
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|