banner
banner

25 Apr 2024, 10:11 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2017, 23:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/12/13
Posts: 315
Post Likes: +152
Location: Northridge, CA
Aircraft: Falcon 50 - Lear 45
I know this is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, but I'm in an interesting position where I'm looking to buy a half share of a Decathlon or a Scout for about the same price. I don't know much about the hours/years or any other specifics yet, but I thought I'd ask the Beech Talk masses - which would you choose and why?

As a side note: I am slightly more interested in doing some off road flying / camping than I am with aerobatics, but both sound fun. Both airframes look excellent as well. But not focusing totally on mission - which is more fun / usable.

What do you think?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2017, 23:58 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14153
Post Likes: +9100
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
I'd take the Scout. The Decathlon is fun little aerobatic plane, but the Scout is a better bush plane and my personal opinion is a plane like this is all about a fun little taildragger, back country grass strip fun rather than wring it out aerobatics.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2017, 23:58 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/12
Posts: 6490
Post Likes: +4548
Location: Portland, OR (KHIO)
Aircraft: 1962 Bonanza P35
Wood spars?

_________________
Paul
I heart flying

ABS Lifetime Member
EAA Lifetime Member


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 00:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/12/11
Posts: 675
Post Likes: +346
Location: Central California
Aircraft: Navajo /7GCBC/TTX
I agree with Adam. Buy the Scout. You want the flaps. The scout will do aerobatics and STOL ops. Not so much with the Decathlon.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 00:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/23/09
Posts: 11886
Post Likes: +10557
Location: Cascade, Idaho (U70)
Aircraft: 182
Scout

_________________
Life is for living.
Backcountry videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSChxm ... fOnWwngH1w


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 00:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/24/08
Posts: 1127
Post Likes: +479
Location: Austin, TX (KGTU)
Aircraft: Baron E55 Pitts S-1S
Is it a straight Decathlon or a Super Decathlon?

_________________
Sorry if I repeat what's already been said, I never read all the posts
Jack Stovall
BE55E


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 01:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 7259
Post Likes: +4529
Company: Inscrutable Fasteners, LLC
Location: West Palm Beach - F45
Aircraft: Planeless
They had a Denali Scout at Osh. 210 HP and a long wing with flaps and plenty of gas to go the distance. $270 large I think.

To be fair, I spent most of my time ogling the Champ in the vintage paint scheme. Had it been less expensive by a bit, I might have flown it home...

Best,
Rich


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 02:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/25/12
Posts: 3732
Post Likes: +3710
Location: KRHV San Jose, CA
Aircraft: A36, R44, C525
Decathlon.

_________________
Rocky Hill

Altitude is Everything.


Last edited on 07 Aug 2017, 08:22, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 06:20 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 1107
Post Likes: +291
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Aircraft: PA-18
that is the QUESTION….

:popcorn:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 07:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/10/13
Posts: 2286
Post Likes: +1671
Location: Lexington, KY
Aircraft: B95A Z526F SU26
Unless you're doing "real" bush flying, the Decathlon will easily land on a short farm strip without issue... just like a Bonanza can, only it needs less runway length for takeoff.

If you're talking about landing/camping at remote airports, don't rule out a Decathlon. Inverted flight is too much fun to pass up. :pilot:

_________________
Steven Morgan
^middle name


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 07:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/11
Posts: 9168
Post Likes: +17163
Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
I have owned both. Love both. The Decathlon will do 80% of what the Scout will do and cruise faster. The Scout will do what it does, short & rough field, better. The Scout has flaps, of course, and more room in the rear seat and baggage (it's wider). It also sits higher with larger tires and, I believe, more useful load.

The airplanes have completely different wings, but both fly beautifully.

Unless aerobatics are pretty important though, I would take the Scout hands down.

Jgreen

_________________
Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 09:47 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 1107
Post Likes: +291
Location: Salzburg, Austria
Aircraft: PA-18
Username Protected wrote:
I know this is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, but I'm in an interesting position where I'm looking to buy a half share of a Decathlon or a Scout for about the same price.


hmm…interesting question…

you may even want to look into an apple-orange by getting a nice Champion Explorer with flaps, let's call it a Citabria with flaps, 160HP or 180HP all for yourself, and may enjoy both worlds…

in my humble opinion nothing beats the simplicity of a fixed pitch bird for those fun flying days...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 09:56 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/24/11
Posts: 525
Post Likes: +339
Company: Keeling Schaefer Vineyards
Location: P33, Willcox, AZ
Aircraft: 1960 BE33 CD160 470J
Decathlon is faster.

_________________
BPT Tucson 1-24, FR, IPC with Ron Zasadzinski


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 11:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/02/13
Posts: 3127
Post Likes: +2980
Location: Stamping Ground, Ky
Aircraft: twin bonanza
Ginger, or MaryAnn?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 07 Aug 2017, 11:41 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/07/10
Posts: 8249
Post Likes: +7268
Location: Boise, ID (S78)
Aircraft: 1964 Bonanza S35
Both.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.Wingman 85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.