banner
banner

20 Apr 2024, 04:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 08 Aug 2017, 10:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/23/09
Posts: 11874
Post Likes: +10532
Location: Cascade, Idaho (U70)
Aircraft: 182
Username Protected wrote:
Both.


Both would be an expensive "proposition" Tracy. Doubt even one aircraft would be in the budget then.... :lol:

If your not traveling xcountry with it then Scout looks like fun. Fun fun choices to be had.... :cheers:

Stu I haven't figured out your post. Like reading a Bra nn I gan novel.


Chuck.....Knowing Tracy as I do, Im guessing the "both" to which Tracy was referring applied to the previous Ginger and Maryanne post. :D
_________________
Life is for living.
Backcountry videos: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSChxm ... fOnWwngH1w


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 08 Aug 2017, 11:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/13/11
Posts: 127
Post Likes: +49
Aircraft: None
Decathlon, especially if it's the super. I only say this because we owned one, but the aerobatics are fun and the thing would land pretty much anywhere it seemed. A friend has a Husky on amphibs (which I'm considering to be Scout-like). The Husky on floats is a blast. On wheels, I wouldn't want it - the Super Decathlon's more fun.

I remember it being payload-limited. Ours had a wooden spar and a 25hr prop inspection AD. The word was that the wooden spars may have some nails pulled if it was snap rolled a lot. This was almost 20 years ago.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 08 Aug 2017, 12:06 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 5590
Post Likes: +2551
Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Username Protected wrote:
Thanks for all the input guys, I'm checking on that wooden spar thing too, I know that was an issue. I'll keep you posted....


Don't be afraid of a wood spar, unless you're talking about a plane with a 1970's fabric job, and pencil whipped annuals where you cannot adequately assess the spar's condition. Any fool recovering wooden wings should be flogged if they do not perform a very thorough inspection for not only the obvious wood rot (unlikely), but much more important, glue joint failures and compression failures, etc (which I have seen). It takes a fair amount of abuse to damage a properly built wood wing, probably more abuse than any metal wing could tolerate... the fabric: not so much.

If a wood spar is in good shape, and the plane is hangared, then I wouldn't think twice about it.


Somewhere, I read that wood doesn't fatigue, aluminum does... We built a hand full of spars for our Citabria projects. All four on two Citabria's and one for a friends. I wouldn't be afraid of a well cared for wood spar.

It's been a few years, but seems like the aluminum spars had issues also..

Jason

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 08 Aug 2017, 12:16 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3003
Post Likes: +5595
Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
Username Protected wrote:
Both.


Image

:D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 08 Aug 2017, 12:22 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/30/08
Posts: 5607
Post Likes: +805
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: SR22
Username Protected wrote:
:D


:rofl:

my vote - obviously the Scout!

_________________
TRUE-COURSE AVIATION INSURANCE - CA License 0G87202
alejandro@true-course.com
805.727.4510


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 08 Aug 2017, 12:59 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/13/09
Posts: 5047
Post Likes: +6510
Location: Nirvana
Aircraft: OPAs
Username Protected wrote:
I have owned both. Love both. The Decathlon will do 80% of what the Scout will do and cruise faster. The Scout will do what it does, short & rough field, better. The Scout has flaps, of course, and more room in the rear seat and baggage (it's wider). It also sits higher with larger tires and, I believe, more useful load.

The airplanes have completely different wings, but both fly beautifully.

Unless aerobatics are pretty important though, I would take the Scout hands down.

Jgreen



I too have owned both a Decathlon, and a Citabria with flaps (not exactly a Scout, but a longer wing, assymetrical airfoil like the Scout has, IIRC).

I completely agree with JGG....unless aerobatics is one of your primary missions....I’d take the Scout.


stan

_________________
"Most of my money I spent on airplanes. The rest I just wasted....."
---the EFI, POF-----


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 09 Aug 2017, 22:42 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/09/10
Posts: 87
Post Likes: +19
Aircraft: citabria
The Super Decathlon is a GREAT all around machine. It just does everything well: Land short, check. Climb 1200fpm with 2 fat guys aboard, check. Loop from level flight, check. Climb faster inverted than a 7ECA will upright, check. Cruise at 140mph, check. A skilled pilot can land it in a 30kt. direct crosswind. Easy to maintain, check. Also, it may the very best aerobatic trainer because, unlike Pitts'es and Extras, one really needs to learn a slow roll (you'll never learn it properly in hotter airplanes).


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 00:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/12/11
Posts: 675
Post Likes: +346
Location: Central California
Aircraft: Navajo /7GCBC/TTX
Username Protected wrote:
This thread needs pics.


How about a 7GCBC with 230HP and constant speed prop


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 07:28 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 12/09/07
Posts: 17011
Post Likes: +12438
Location: Cascade, ID (U70)
Aircraft: C182
Scout, in its natural environment. :thumbup:


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
"Great photo! You must have a really good camera."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 08:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/28/13
Posts: 6048
Post Likes: +4018
Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
Tom,
Great pics! Do I recognize Sulphur Creek? ID74
Jumping into Sulphur was sooo much fun in June with Paul Cainkar right seat telling me to turn base at the granite knob sticking off the mountain like a nose. Haha
Great bfast and people! I was so busy going in I didn't make a video. Takeoff I did.

_________________
Chuck
KEVV


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 08:10 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 12/09/07
Posts: 17011
Post Likes: +12438
Location: Cascade, ID (U70)
Aircraft: C182
Username Protected wrote:
Tom,
Great pics! Do I recognize Sulphur Creek? ID74
Jumping into Sulphur was sooo much fun in June with Paul Cainkar right seat telling me to turn base at the granite knob sticking off the mountain like a nose. Haha
Great bfast and people! I was so busy going in I didn't make a video. Takeoff I did.


Yep. That's Sulphur Creek. :thumbup:

_________________
"Great photo! You must have a really good camera."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 08:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/03/08
Posts: 14568
Post Likes: +22936
Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
and how long to take the scout from Rick's photo and fly it to the location of Tom's photo ? (the answer can be rounded to the nearest whole day for convenience)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 10:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/10/10
Posts: 940
Post Likes: +622
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Aircraft: Conquest
Username Protected wrote:
Cruise at 140mph, check.


Will a Super Decathlon really cruise at 140 mph? C'mon....

_________________
----Still emotionally attached to my Baron----


Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 14:36 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/13/11
Posts: 127
Post Likes: +49
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Cruise at 140mph, check.


Will a Super Decathlon really cruise at 140 mph? C'mon....


Ours did all day long. A bit more, possibly. 120 or 125kts if I recall.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Decathlon vs Scout - which would you choose
PostPosted: 10 Aug 2017, 14:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/17/17
Posts: 160
Post Likes: +113
Location: 18AZ Carefree, Arizona
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
I used to love flying Decathlons. They don't have flaps but put in full rudder and they slip great. Easy to land in big crosswinds or pretty short fields. A lot of them were used for aerobatic training and they can break the wing ribs, also the motor mounts will let the engine move around & cut holes in the cowl.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.