banner
banner

19 Apr 2024, 13:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 16 May 2017, 14:40 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/10/14
Posts: 1488
Post Likes: +1205
Location: St George UT
Aircraft: Mooney D 1964
I'm reading this thread with some amusement.

I live most of the time in the Mooney world, occasionally wander into the dark side of Beech and Cessna :-) But mostly Mooney for 17 years. Before then I was (am) a committed 182 type driver.

In the Mooney world nothing brigs up as much chatter as "SPEED MODS" Pages and pages have been written on "speed mods" on Mooneys over the years. Maybe its more of building your own hot rod type of thinking but in the end you wind up with minimal gains for the trouble. 4 kts, here, 3 kts there as advertised but in the end maybe half of what is claimed.
Their rule of thumb? 1 AMU per knot, maybe. $5000 for 5 kts? you won't even see that in most normal flying.

IMO (50 years worth) if you want a faster airplane, go out an buy a faster airplane. There ain't no free lunch.

I do a solid 135-138 kts TAS around the 10,000' area burning 9.5/hr. I've got better than 950 lbs useful load and 5.5 hrs range (I don't sit that long any more) on 180 HP. As I remember right at 182 speeds but 3 GPH less. So at 50 hrs/year (retired flying) I'm saving less than $1000/yr in gas. Maintenance, eh, probably in the same ball park $wise.

If I needed to go faster I'd get a O-470 V tail or a Debbie. They are both a step up in speed. None of the "speed mods" on my Mooney will match that.

As I age I don't bend and fold as good as I did so the 182 may be getting the nod as for easier entry (the Bo would have the same issues). I'm thinking of finding a certain 61 182 that I flew quite a bit 35 years ago. It's still registered. Maybe the owner wants to sell.


Top

 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 16 May 2017, 18:29 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/12/14
Posts: 917
Post Likes: +169
Location: Boise, ID
Username Protected wrote:
Does the P-ponk O-520 help much in cruise speed, or just climb? Are any 182's really cruising at 150 knots?

My T182T does 145 kts at 8000 ft on 12 gal/hr and 155 it's at 16kft at 13 gal/hr.
Not A36 speeds but it hold 7 hrs of fuel.


The turbo is the way to go if you're doing cross country work. The RG is also an excellent choice. Both do involve more expense, more so in maintenance than acquisition.

Top

 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 16 May 2017, 18:30 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/12/14
Posts: 917
Post Likes: +169
Location: Boise, ID
Username Protected wrote:
What about the io520 conversions claiming 160kt+ cruise speeds? Bogus?


I think the various speed mods can make a big difference.


Bogus. It's such a draggy airframe that adding power doesn't help much. You might see some gain firewalled, but who flies that way? Expect +5-10 kts.

Power is surplus power for climb and DA performance, not cruise.

Top

 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 16 May 2017, 18:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/12/14
Posts: 917
Post Likes: +169
Location: Boise, ID
One more thing to keep in mind is some of the early narrow body 182s are quite fast. Many will do 140 kts, on mo-gas, at 11GPH.


Top

 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 17 May 2017, 10:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/21/13
Posts: 343
Post Likes: +215
Location: SW Colorado
Aircraft: 182PPonk
Username Protected wrote:
The single biggest asset, seems to me, is that a P-Ponk, for instance, simply gives you 15% more power at altitude and offers a couple of thousand more feet of "usable" altitude.

Jgreen


That's what I figured, John. Seems that the PPonk is desired by those using high elevation strips. It's why I looked for one when I was shopping for a 182. Now, I just have to get up there to put it to work. ;)


This is why I sought out the PPonk when I was looking for a 182. I fly out of KPAN at 5000 feet to KPSO at almost 8000 feet. I appreciate the added climb power getting in and out of these airports.

Top

 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 17 May 2017, 10:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/21/13
Posts: 343
Post Likes: +215
Location: SW Colorado
Aircraft: 182PPonk
Username Protected wrote:
I have owned over 30 airplanes over the years. Flown a lot more than that as my log book starts when I was eleven years old. Owned a lot of great airplanes including a brand new F-33 Bonanza in '92, a T-Bone, a Queen Air, T-34, a Musketeer, and a Twin Beech..

I bought my "retirement" airplane four years ago, a Skylane, then sold it to a friend and bought a 180 just because I love tail draggers. After all these years and all these airplanes, there was never any doubt as to what I would end my years of flying with.

Kick the tires, light the fires, load to the gills and go. With absolutely no modesty, I will say that I can, at least at this point, land a Skylane or 180 in a McDonald's parking lot and walk away with nothing more than a Big Mac, Been flying the damn things for 57 years and they simply work.

Love Bonanzas and every Beech product I ever owned. Still, simplicity is a virtue in itself.

Fly what you love though, I'm all for you. :clap:

Jgreen


So said the philosopher CS&N: "If you can't be with the on you love, honey, love the one you're with!" ;)


Top

 Post subject: Re: C-182 Maintenance
PostPosted: 17 May 2017, 16:55 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/07/12
Posts: 224
Post Likes: +114
Aircraft: Cessna 185
Been in the Cessna camp since I stated flying in 1966 when we purchased a beater 170. had another 170, then a great 180 and then to my present 185 in 1976. Well almost only Cessna's. We purchased a used Super Cub in 1989 for my sons to get their PPL in back in 1989. They own a a 57 straight tail 182 that they purchased in 1991 and have restored to near new condition. They and I both love that old 182 and the way it fly's.

My friends over the years have owned Beech, Piper and Mooney aircraft, they were all good aircraft. Also have friends with other diverse aircraft including a few war birds, light and heavy and a number of other types. A few with strange quirks, but still good airplanes.

Still like the Cessna line myself. Talk about speed, most 182's are a good 150 knots with a lot of $$$ spent. The stock ones are good for 130+ knots, bear in mind there can be quite a difference between air frames speed wise.

The 180 is a little faster with out the nose gear. I have several friends that have 520's in early models with a lot of mods. They can push 200 mph.

The 185 is a great aircraft. I had a rancher friend years ago from Oregon that tried to make his K model 180 into a 185, spent big bucks and still wasn't happy, sold it and purchased a Mooney. The fastest 185 was owned by my good friend Tommy Rose. He died in 2002 racing a Quester at the Reno Air Races, it came apart at over 300 mph in a race. We had just spent several hours with him going over the changes he made to it prior to the fatal race. His 185 did 213 mph at the Sun & Fun show in the early nineties in a race there. He never would tell me what he spent to make it go that fast. He even hired an aeronautical engineer to help him prepare the 185 for that race, that 185 was highly modified, take to long to tell that story now.

In our 180/185 club there have been many aircraft modified in different ways over the years for speed. Some say just buy a Bo if you want to go fast. My 185 has the Snider speed kit with 206 wheel pants on my 800x6 rubber. Also a 88 inch Mac, Big Foot 3 blade prop. standard 3 blade on a 185 is 80 inch. Also I've removed the tail cone beacon. It is a 155 knot 185 when light and 150+ at gross, this is 8,000 feet and above.. Never have tried to see what it will do at sea level with what I have done to it. With a 550 instead of the 520 you will get 160+ knots. I have a good friend that had about the same on his 185 with a 550 and 80 inch 3 blade and it did the 160+. Most people feel a 3 blade is a little slower than a 2. Been a lot of fun over the years watching and trying different mods on our type aircraft and what different people have come up with. There is quite a difference between the same type aircraft from the factory, some are born fast.

On one last note in 1988 eight couples in the club did a 2 week trip to Alaska in our 180/185 aircraft. When we left Dawson Creek one morning headed to Eagle, AK for customs and then on to Fort Yukon, Mick Reeves was flying the original 180 previously owned by the guy that developed the speed kit for our aircraft and equipped with it and a 470 R engine. At that time I only had a 86 inch 2 blade and the 206 panties over my 800's. We were flying up the Yukon River and Mick said lets run them to see who is the fastest. We set up side by side and pushed them up, I was full throttle and kept pushing the rpm up, as I neared 2800 I thought this is dumb, what if I blow the engine out here in nowhere. We were still about the same speed and I looked at the asi and saw near red line, so they will flat smoke close to sea level.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.