19 Apr 2024, 15:27 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 04 Mar 2017, 02:39 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5233 Post Likes: +3026 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't believe so. Lots of other work I suppose. Unbelievable isn't it. Problem is tieing into the existing equipment I'd guess. I've not asked for a quote so details are hazy with time and second hand. In a 1+/2+/3 WAAS upgrade costs about $50K. The GPS-4000 box in the tail is replaced with a WAAS GPS box. And the FMS3000 is upgraded for WAAS approaches. ADS-B costs range from $35K - $65K depending on the model transponder and who does it. Two transponders need to be sent to RC for upgrades, some new wiring is required to connect the WAAS GAS to the transponders, and the RTUs need to be upgraded. I don't know where your friend spent the other $75K. He might have also upgraded his IFIS to realease 6.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 04 Mar 2017, 22:27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/16/10 Posts: 8891 Post Likes: +1956
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 100K . Well that all together isn't a deal breaker. So long as you know this when settling on a price. This is a whole lotta airplane. Still, I look at the panel and it seems broken. I have gotten too used to Synthetic vision and having a flight path vector. And I too reliant on it? No, I think not, I have been instrument flying since 1983. So I am very much comfortable with raw data and no auto pilot. I do really like, (and who doesn't?) the latest capabilites.
_________________ If you think nobody cares about you. Try not paying your income tax.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 04 Mar 2017, 23:09 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5233 Post Likes: +3026 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 100K . Well that all together isn't a deal breaker. So long as you know this when settling on a price. This is a whole lotta airplane. Still, I look at the panel and it seems broken. I have gotten too used to Synthetic vision and having a flight path vector. And I too reliant on it? No, I think not, I have been instrument flying since 1983. So I am very much comfortable with raw data and no auto pilot. I do really like, (and who doesn't?) the latest capabilites.
So when do you really think you need syn vision in a turbojet that also has TAWS displayed? You will only be below 10,000' when on departure or arrival. You have LNAV & VNAV capability for the FMS and AP to take you to any point in the airspace. You have TAWS to display high terrain and warn you if necessary. You are rarely going to be flying in IMC.
I can see a value if you regularly fly into mountainous airports with lousy approaches in IMC or at night. Otherwise with all of the other capabilities of a CJ3 syn vis is cool but adds little to the capabilities of the aircraft.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 04 Mar 2017, 23:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/28/13 Posts: 6048 Post Likes: +4018 Location: Indiana
Aircraft: C195, D17S, M20TN
|
|
That's the difference flying in the FL's brings. Over/around the weather. Ice protection, pressurization, smoother rides, less stress all around. Synvis nice but not necessary. ProLine though is clunky to work in my limited experience with it and its heads down between the seats. I fly single pilot. I'm sure that PL comment will cause a stir but its my opinion only. I've been told it would get better as I learned it. Okay okay I've become the old codger I never wanted to be... Show me I'm wrong. Lots of good used older equipment out there.
_________________ Chuck KEVV
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 04:31 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5233 Post Likes: +3026 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ProLine though is clunky to work in my limited experience with it and its heads down between the seats. I fly single pilot. I'm sure that PL comment will cause a stir but its my opinion only. I've been told it would get better as I learned it.
I fly SP also. In flight most of the PL21 stuff between the seats can be done by feel once you get the hang of it. You do need to get the FMS properly setup. I don't think it is any more heads down then all the knob twisting in the G1000 or using the GTC on the G3000. Plan to put the Proline Fusion in a CJ3 for around $350K and it addresses your complaints and gives you syn vis.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 08:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jason how did the useful load and legs on the CJ3 compare to the Pilatus? CJ3 is a good trade in that regard. We loaded it the same and had the same endurance as the PC12. The cabin however it much smaller than the PC12 and I'd lose my "whiz bang" avionics. But those aren't deal breakers. The reason I haven't pulled the trigger is: 1. I still do so many short haul trips. 2. The SP jet market is getting flooded with SP jets and prices keep dropping.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 09:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20120 Post Likes: +23597 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I used to have Synthetic Viz in my Bonanza but have lived without it for 4 years. It's $100K to unlock the software in the Pilatus to get it.
It's hard for me to understand these prices. $300K for new avionics in a CJ?? !! $100K to "unlock" software?? !! I suppose that business model is just ---> "because we can!"
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 09:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's hard for me to understand these prices. $300K for new avionics in a CJ?? !! $100K to "unlock" software?? !! I suppose that business model is just ---> "because we can!" Yup. That's exactly what it is. 1. Can you blame them? 2. Is there anything you can do about it? Answer to both..... NO.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 10:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6357 Post Likes: +5540 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Turbo Commander 680V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's hard for me to understand these prices. $300K for new avionics in a CJ?? !! $100K to "unlock" software?? !! I suppose that business model is just ---> "because we can!" Yup. That's exactly what it is. 1. Can you blame them? 2. Is there anything you can do about it? Answer to both..... NO.
Can't you just stick a GTN 750 in them and be done with it?
_________________ Problem is the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 11:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/16/10 Posts: 8891 Post Likes: +1956
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So when do you really think you need syn vision in a turbojet that also has TAWS displayed? Yes, justifying not having these things can be done. Now having synthetic vision and nice moving maps with weather and traffic for a few years, I have gotten to like it. And I look at these other panels and they looks somewhat primitive. With the prices dropping, someone will be buying these birds and yes, they are still very capable. Unless they are not 2020 compliant. That year is fast approaching. What I gather is that anybody holding the bag then will be spending 100k to become compliant? Not so bad as it will have been factored into the purchase price. A problem will occur with scheduling the work. The shops will get jammed up, business will be great for them!
_________________ If you think nobody cares about you. Try not paying your income tax.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 11:38 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Otherwise with all of the other capabilities of a CJ3 syn vis is cool but adds little to the capabilities of the aircraft. Synth viz adds no capabilities to any aircraft per se. You can't do anything "new" with it, at least legally. But it does add a lot of situational awareness in routine operations and it opens up emergency uses, for example, deliberate below minimums approaches should that be required. Having better awareness of the terrain and the runway depiction makes it far more likely a below minimums approach succeeds. Synth viz essentially turns any IMC situation into pseudo VMC with all the extra awareness that brings. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Dumping CJ3's Posted: 05 Mar 2017, 13:12 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5233 Post Likes: +3026 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Otherwise with all of the other capabilities of a CJ3 syn vis is cool but adds little to the capabilities of the aircraft. Synth viz adds no capabilities to any aircraft per se. You can't do anything "new" with it, at least legally. But it does add a lot of situational awareness in routine operations and it opens up emergency uses, for example, deliberate below minimums approaches should that be required. Having better awareness of the terrain and the runway depiction makes it far more likely a below minimums approach succeeds. Synth viz essentially turns any IMC situation into pseudo VMC with all the extra awareness that brings. Mike C.
You are stretching your justification to say that CJ3s get into those type of emergency situations. It has the range and speed to find a decent approach.
Maybe a SF50 needs it.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|