24 Apr 2024, 18:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 16:46 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/16/10 Posts: 131 Post Likes: +52 Location: Toronto, Canada
Aircraft: 601P
|
|
Quote: Mike C, that was the one. Really surprising when things like that happen. Like crashing your Bonanza when the door opens. That only happened to me once! You only crashed once when the door opened....?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 17:42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/01/15 Posts: 52 Post Likes: +13 Location: KGPZ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Brent
I came to this forum to post a very similar scenario. I have a TN A36 and really like it. I have two issues that the Malibu solves. AC and pressurization. You add AC to my A36 and my useful is back to similar levels as a continental Malibu. The problem I have is I really like my A36. Hard to buy another plane you hope you like more.
I like to fly at 12-17. My wife and kids hate masks. Kids are 8 and 2. We never have a weight issue for our family. We run out of space. Another issue a PA46 can solve. Without the young kids I'd probably not be looking. I keep coming back to look at the PA46 also. It was really close between a PA46 and the Aerostar when I was shopping back in 2011. Now my mission is closer to the sweet spot of the PA46. Trying to decide between renting for a while longer and buying. Oh well, I can foresee that I will never stay with just one plane, I am going to change a few more times, (last kid is 13 tomorrow, so not much longer). Tim
I've been learning all I can about those two airframes lately. Just for my education, how would you distinguish the mission of an aerostar from a PA46?
Thanks.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 18:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12799 Post Likes: +5226 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just for my education, how would you distinguish the mission of an aerostar from a PA46?
Thanks. 1) two engines - duh, but for some people that's a deal breaker 2) speed - aerostar is a 220-260kt cruise airplane, piston PA46 is more 180-220 3) payload - probably more payload flexibility with an aerostar, especially as the later PA46's got heavy 4) hangar - aerostar has substantially tighter wingspan
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 19:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 11898 Post Likes: +2854 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just for my education, how would you distinguish the mission of an aerostar from a PA46?
Thanks. 1) two engines - duh, but for some people that's a deal breaker 2) speed - aerostar is a 220-260kt cruise airplane, piston PA46 is more 180-220 3) payload - probably more payload flexibility with an aerostar, especially as the later PA46's got heavy 4) hangar - aerostar has substantially tighter wingspan
In addition: 5. I think the A* is more "all weather", and with the pressurization increase can climb very comfortably up to 28K where on the demo rides the piston PA46 seemed to "struggle" the last few K to 25K. 6. The A* was lower in capital costs but higher operating costs.
In terms off mission; I was flying more schedule oriented and often carrying four/five people for 900NM I needed the greater payload capacity, weather capability and speed.
Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 19:50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 5. I think the A* is more "all weather", and with the pressurization increase can climb very comfortably up to 28K where on the demo rides the piston PA46 seemed to "struggle" the last few K to 25K. Similarly, I'd want to be in the Aerostar in icing conditions versus the PA46. Power is beneficial in icing situations and twins just have more of it. The Aerostar will give a better ride in turbulence. Twins are heavier. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 22:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 11898 Post Likes: +2854 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I loved the idea of the Aerostar until I got in one. For me the PA-46 has more room for cockpit and cabin. Its really hard to beat the club seating and cabin class door on the PA-46.
Not at all slamming the A* for its performance, its a killer plane. A good buddy has one and loves it, which is why I started to consider it. But he has a smaller family and he is not as tall as I am. If my family was not so large (my 13 year old is 6ft and 21yr old is 6"5") then I would do a A* for sure. So many great things about it.
the PA-46 is much cheaper to operate than the A*. No free lunches.
Mike Yeah, for that tall you need the high density foam seats which are really thin. They give you an extra inch or two in height, and then the recliner options on the seat backs. It would work, however the PA-46 is a better fit I think for really tall people because the seats are much closer to the floor giving more headroom and also a longer cabin giving space to stretch the legs. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 22:11 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 2923 Post Likes: +928 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
Except no recline for the drivers seat in the Aerostar.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 15 Feb 2017, 22:34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 11898 Post Likes: +2854 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Except no recline for the drivers seat in the Aerostar. Mine did. Not full, but had two or three positions. It was like that when I bought and then sold the plane. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 16 Feb 2017, 15:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/01/10 Posts: 217 Post Likes: +54
Aircraft: C425, Pitts S2B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Brent
I came to this forum to post a very similar scenario. I have a TN A36 and really like it. I have two issues that the Malibu solves. AC and pressurization. You add AC to my A36 and my useful is back to similar levels as a continental Malibu. The problem I have is I really like my A36. Hard to buy another plane you hope you like more.
I like to fly at 12-17. My wife and kids hate masks. Kids are 8 and 2. We never have a weight issue for our family. We run out of space. Another issue a PA46 can solve. Without the young kids I'd probably not be looking. It really is a tough decision. I sold my Maule last September and was ready to sell the bonanza and jump into a pressurized airplane. I just haven't found a fit that I am comfortable with yet that gives me enough benefits over the bonanza to justify turning my life upside down. The increased expense and time to get through the search, purchase, training and new airplane blues that comes with moving up hasn't comfortable presented itself yet. I'm back looking at Barons, thinking a 58 would make a really great compromise for us. This has been a great discussion on the PA46, and I really appreciate all the input. Brent
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 17 Feb 2017, 01:26 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/25/14 Posts: 5 Post Likes: +4
Aircraft: PA46
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Brent
I came to this forum to post a very similar scenario. I have a TN A36 and really like it. I have two issues that the Malibu solves. AC and pressurization. You add AC to my A36 and my useful is back to similar levels as a continental Malibu. The problem I have is I really like my A36. Hard to buy another plane you hope you like more.
I like to fly at 12-17. My wife and kids hate masks. Kids are 8 and 2. We never have a weight issue for our family. We run out of space. Another issue a PA46 can solve. Without the young kids I'd probably not be looking. It really is a tough decision. I sold my Maule last September and was ready to sell the bonanza and jump into a pressurized airplane. I just haven't found a fit that I am comfortable with yet that gives me enough benefits over the bonanza to justify turning my life upside down. The increased expense and time to get through the search, purchase, training and new airplane blues that comes with moving up hasn't comfortable presented itself yet. I'm back looking at Barons, thinking a 58 would make a really great compromise for us. This has been a great discussion on the PA46, and I really appreciate all the input. Brent
Brent, If you have a desire for pressurization and a mission for it. It is a complete game changer in my book don't discount the capability of it. The complexity is not an issue with the plane having pressure, it's the elements you can fly in and through that make it complex.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 07 Apr 2017, 19:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/26/09 Posts: 2911 Post Likes: +973 Company: SkewTLogPro Location: Tampa, FL (KVDF)
Aircraft: 1984 Bonanza A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It is the perfect family airplane, just as long as you're no taller than 5'11" Today I climbed/contorted into the left seat of the demo Jetprop at SNF. It was a beautiful aircraft but I had to keep my head at a 45* angle with the seat all the way back. It was a lot smaller than I expected. It makes the A36 feel like a C-17.
_________________ Friends don't let friends fly commercial.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: PA46 Malibu/Mirage Posted: 08 Apr 2017, 10:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14152 Post Likes: +9099 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It is the perfect family airplane, just as long as you're no taller than 5'11" Today I climbed/contorted into the left seat of the demo Jetprop at SNF. It was a beautiful aircraft but I had to keep my head at a 45* angle with the seat all the way back. It was a lot smaller than I expected. It makes the A36 feel like a C-17.
Same problem here, I was able to sit if I removed the pull out seat cushion, but far from ideal (I'm 6'4"). I wish they made the whole tube 2" wider.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|