26 Nov 2025, 23:29 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 00:37 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/21/09 Posts: 12472 Post Likes: +17112 Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Id almost choose a lower powered Lycoming Cirrus over a 22 to get away from Continental. So I ask the former owner of my 182T with the Lyc if he recommends any tricks to hot start the new plane, as most of my planes have always had something just a bit different that helped. He said, as if it made perfect sense: just use the method in the POH - no problems. Now it may also have something to do with a starter that you could taxi on.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 01:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/17/11 Posts: 547 Post Likes: +82 Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Aircraft: Cessna 150M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Funny that Beech is owned by Textron and their piston aircraft use TCM engines. Cirrus is owned by the Chinese and the new G6 SR20 is powered by a Lycoming engine
I would imagine once the pre-existing contracts end we will see lycoming powered bonanza and barons, GE powered King Airs, all spinning McCauley props (Unless textron has dismantled beech completely by then).
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 01:48 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 09/05/12 Posts: 6998 Post Likes: +5197 Location: Portland, OR (KHIO)
Aircraft: 1962 Bonanza P35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: we will see lycoming powered bonanza and barons, Machen Bonanzas and the 56 Baron! Woot Woot!
_________________ Paul I heart flying
ABS Lifetime Member EAA Lifetime Member
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 02:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20781 Post Likes: +26295 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why is it so easy for Cirrus to understand how to make advancements in developing their airplanes? Adding power to increase gross weight is a technique that goes back almost to the Wright Brothers. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 05:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20363 Post Likes: +25491 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lycoming? That's kind of sleeping with the enemy, isn't it? Also, possibly foreboding...I imagine that Cirrus was a chunk of Continental's business.
Cirrus only sold 31 SR-20's in each of the 2014 and 2015 years; the other ~ 90% of their piston sales were SR-22's, and they're still using Continentals.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 18:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/11/09 Posts: 1964 Post Likes: +300 Location: KSTJ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why is it so easy for Cirrus to understand how to make advancements in developing their airplanes? Adding power to increase gross weight is a technique that goes back almost to the Wright Brothers. Mike C.
I think the gross weight increase is coming mainly from the G1000 Nxi avionics package. Getting rid of a bunch of heavy stuff that the G1000 relies on.
I don't think they are doing anything to the engine on the SR22 line. Lycoming is only for the SR2) line.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 2017 Cirrus SR20 Gains 150lbs Useful Load Posted: 05 Jan 2017, 18:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 2931 Post Likes: +5605 Location: Portland, OR
Aircraft: Prusinski'ing
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Adding power to increase gross weight is a technique that goes back almost to the Wright Brothers.
Mike C. I think the gross weight increase is coming mainly from the G1000 Nxi avionics package. Getting rid of a bunch of heavy stuff that the G1000 relies on. I don't think they are doing anything to the engine on the SR22 line. Lycoming is only for the SR2) line.
I don't think the G1000 suite has ever weighed near 150#. I have 75 or 80 in my mind for some reason.
Moving from the CMI IO-360 to the 215hp Lyc IO-390, however, seems like a great reason to seek a GW increase.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|