29 Mar 2024, 10:32 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CESSNA DENALI SINGLE ENGINE TURBOPROP Posted: 15 Oct 2017, 09:09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13064 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A CJ3+ will meet the PC-12 and the CJ4 will beat it's pants off for less than 9mm. Less than 7 for the 3+ new. Semantics though There are a number of downsides with the CJ3+ and CJ4 compared to the PC12. CJ4 costs 2X what the PC12 costs. I would hope it "beats it's pants off". Unfortunately, you're only addressing speed.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CESSNA DENALI SINGLE ENGINE TURBOPROP Posted: 15 Oct 2017, 10:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6059 Post Likes: +702 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
You dont need to buy it if you dont want it as its easily removable. I think its a good option as a lot of TBM owners travel with 1-2 person. Username Protected wrote: That's clearly not what I'm talking about. Looks like a frankenlav.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CESSNA DENALI SINGLE ENGINE TURBOPROP Posted: 15 Oct 2017, 22:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5430 Post Likes: +6115 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The cabin in the CJs is a lot smaller. By a good margin. Ive always considered that the downside to the CJ class compared to other airplanes that have the same range and payload capabilities.
The rear cargo door is a LOT smaller.....
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CESSNA DENALI SINGLE ENGINE TURBOPROP Posted: 16 Oct 2017, 19:00 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/04/11 Posts: 1712 Post Likes: +242 Company: W. John Gadd, Esq. Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You are deluding yourself if you think PC12 and Phenom 300 are competing against each other for customers.
Mike C. Ha. No I'm not. I've been shopping them a long time. The next step up from a PC12 is a Phenom 300. I actually have a really hard time finding any PC12 owners that have ever gone from PC12 to jet. They just stay with PC12.
With good reason. PC12 has to be very hard to beat.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: CESSNA DENALI SINGLE ENGINE TURBOPROP Posted: 17 Oct 2017, 14:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13064 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: . Less than 7 for the 3+ new. Semantics though After several phone calls I can confirm that this is not true. Maybe you just get better deals than I do.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|