22 Nov 2025, 14:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Twin or single with a parachute Posted: 28 Aug 2015, 19:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/16/12 Posts: 1147 Post Likes: +1300 Location: KFWS
Aircraft: E55 IO550s
|
|
|
Given the recent thread about the choice between a Cirrus and a Baron or Diamond twin, I found myself having a similar dilemma. Currently a Mooney driver, soon (within a year), the mission will change to regular trips between Denver and Dallas. Will stay on the east side of the Rockies, and don't plan on regular trips to cross them. The reason to change is perceived safety (maybe even true safety). A significant number of trips will be in the evening, so having a parachute or another engine would make me feel more comfortable. Budget is about 200k-250k. By far most of the trips will be just me and maybe one other person on weekend trips. Would prefer some kind of icing protection. Options: Cirrus Gen 2 - 2006 model seems to fall around my financial target. Generation 3 models seem to be almost 100k outside the price range :( B55/58/Cessna 310. Looks like I could buy a 1975ish model for about 100k. Willing to spend another 100k for avionics/interior and make it a very nice airplane. Not needing all the increase in load utility, but nice to have it. Not so worried about the difference in fuel burn. Don't plan to be in a hurry, and I can always throttle back a little. More worried about overhauling 2 engines, plus all the extra expense that an older airplane requires. I have sat in a B55 and seems a bit crammed (weird coming from a guy that currently has a Mooney, but in all honesty I find Mooneys to have plenty of space especially for taller guys). I have also sat in C310 and enjoyed the roomier cabin. Have not had a chance to sit in a Cirrus. I have not flown in any of them. I have about 400 hours in total, IFR rated. Not sure how much my insurance would be at this point. Planning on flying around 150 hours a year, maybe a bit more. What do you guys suggest?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin or single with a parachute Posted: 28 Aug 2015, 19:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/19/11 Posts: 3068 Post Likes: +3203 Company: Preoccupied Location: Margaritaville
Aircraft: Plane? What plane?
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What do you guys suggest? Using the search function. Mike
_________________ Flying. It's a hard habit to break.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin or single with a parachute Posted: 28 Aug 2015, 20:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13631 Post Likes: +7766 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He said $100 purchase plus $100 upgrade for the baron.
1). Do you have a spouse? If so, Do what they want.
2) how about an SR20? For the mission you mention it should work and be well within budget. SR20 is essentially a 172. The second $100 was for cosmetics. My point was you can't find a mechanically sound 58 (worthy of $100K in fancy stuff) for $100K. At least I haven't seen one. Spouse advice is right on the money.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin or single with a parachute Posted: 28 Aug 2015, 21:10 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/16/12 Posts: 1147 Post Likes: +1300 Location: KFWS
Aircraft: E55 IO550s
|
|
|
No spouse. I can actually do what I want, so trying to make a somewhat rational decision. SR 20 does not have ice protection. It would be a significant downgrade from the Mooney, except for the parachute option. Total budget is 200k. Which means it could be split for a B55 in 100k purchase price and 100k upgrade options, or a B58 150k purchase price and 50k upgrade options. C310 could also be had for about 100k purchase price, which makes it an attractive choice as well. The SR 22 Gen 2 has a lot of what I want except the ice protection (TKS only). It is also much newer. Significant depreciation to follow post purchase, but also less operating cost/overhaul cost. A 2009 Gen 3 would be a great option, but those go for about 430K, which would mean I would need to finance it. I made a vow to keep my aviation budget to cash/check only, no loans...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin or single with a parachute Posted: 28 Aug 2015, 22:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: .....buy the nicest plane you can find and don't spend a dime more on it. That's the way to buy an aeroplane!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Twin or single with a parachute Posted: 28 Aug 2015, 23:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/19/09 Posts: 1023 Post Likes: +523 Location: Tulsa OK
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
|
Perhaps I'm a contrarian but I've done exactly as Charles and a slew of others have warned against. I could afford to own and operate a wide array of aircraft to suit my needs but I chose a late '70's vintage B55 P2 baron to upgrade to like new condition. It has new remans, new interior, full glass integrated cockpit, new windows all around, every major system (and probably every minor one also) has been overhauled or replaced. It will have a nicer paint job than most brand new airplanes as soon as don Copeland can work it in. I will have less than a third invested in it than a new baron costs. And mine will outperform the new baron in many respects. I just don't see how legacy twins are dead. There is a market for these planes because they do what nothing else can for the same amount of money. Where am I misguided?
_________________ Kent Wyatt Tulsa, OK KGCM
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|