02 Dec 2025, 05:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 21 Dec 2015, 22:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not that I intend to purchase a T210, but my brother spent over 60K having his T210's motor changed out. It still runs hotter than I would like. His T210 burns 2 GPH more than my Bonanza at the same TAS and the same altitude. I would think that your firm could improve on that.
Tom
Does your Bo have a turbo?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 21 Dec 2015, 23:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Western Skyways has been working on certifying a TN210. See https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9DiRf_Fgr_U&feature=youtu.behttp://www.westernskyways.com/turbonormalized_cessna.asp 210N IO520 Turbo Normalized by Western Skyways 120-125 KIAS ROC 900-1100 FPM 7000- 180000 CHT 350-390 11,500~ 185-192 ktas 14,000~ 196-201 ktas 17,000~ 197-203 ktas ________________________________________________________ 210N IO550 Turbo Normalized by Western Skyways 3700 lbs. OAT 85 Base Elevation 5782 120-125 kias ROC 1100-1400 FPM 7000-18000 msl CHT in climb 350-390 Cruise at 11,500-12000~ feet 196-203 ktas Cruise at 14000~ 200-210 ktas Cruise at 17500~ 203-212 ktas Another block of numbers; C210N with turbo normalized IO550F Density Altitude 7,200. Climb from 5780 base elevation. Full gross weight. 1000 fpm rate of climb Altitude 11,500-12,000 feet Cruise 196-198 KTAS 2450 RPM 16gph LOP 207-209 KTAS 2420 ROM 22gph ROP Altitude 14000 FT Cruise 198-202 KTAS 2430 RPM 16-16.5 gph LOP 206-210 KTAS 2430 RPM 21~ gph ROP Altitude 17,500-17,800 Cruise 207-211 KTAS 2410 RPM 14.8-15.4 gph LOP 209-218 KTAS 2410 RPM 21~ gph ROP --------------------
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 21 Dec 2015, 23:52 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/22/14 Posts: 10395 Post Likes: +21100 Company: Mountain Airframe LLC Location: Mena, Arkansas
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have some vague recollection ten years ago in Ada that george basically said if there was demand he'd build it. I don't think the 210 (or 310) market really made the business case.
Plus there's PRISM, and the 100LL replacement, and the TN Cirrus, and the TN Baron that george has on his plate. Yes, I remember my brothers, one older and one younger; all three of us trying our best to shake Dad down for upping the performance of our go-cart engine. It was a big thing back in late 70's and early 80's. We knew all sorts of tricks, and Dad did too. I remember very vividly Dad saying "one %#$@ at a time"
_________________ If a diligent man puts his energy into the exclusive effort, a molehill can be made into a mountain
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 24 Dec 2015, 16:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 1164 Post Likes: +498 Company: Western Skyways 800-575-9929 Location: Montrose, CO
Aircraft: T210N, A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have some vague recollection ten years ago in Ada that george basically said if there was demand he'd build it. I don't think the 210 (or 310) market really made the business case.
Western Skyways has just added some 46 airframes to the Turbo Normalized family. (complete line of 206, 207 and 210 with either the 520 or 550 engines). This took roughly 7 years to complete, and truckloads of money for R&D. Prior to STC issuance, 13 jobs were pre-ordered and paid for. There are 80 some as of now on our watch list for calendar slots. This is on top of the Western Skyways Turbo Normalizing STC for the Bonanza. This is also on top of over 300 engines built this year alone, with a total of 1100 work orders from all streams (component overhaul, engine installation, etc).
_________________ Kind Regards,
Eric Barker 970-901-5528 Cell Western Skyways http://www.westernskyways.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 24 Dec 2015, 17:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 1164 Post Likes: +498 Company: Western Skyways 800-575-9929 Location: Montrose, CO
Aircraft: T210N, A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Western Skyways has been working on certifying a TN210. See https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9DiRf_Fgr_U&feature=youtu.behttp://www.westernskyways.com/turbonormalized_cessna.asp 210N IO520 Turbo Normalized by Western Skyways 120-125 KIAS ROC 900-1100 FPM 7000- 180000 CHT 350-390 11,500~ 185-192 ktas 14,000~ 196-201 ktas 17,000~ 197-203 ktas ________________________________________________________ 210N IO550 Turbo Normalized by Western Skyways 3700 lbs. OAT 85 Base Elevation 5782 120-125 kias ROC 1100-1400 FPM 7000-18000 msl CHT in climb 350-390 Cruise at 11,500-12000~ feet 196-203 ktas Cruise at 14000~ 200-210 ktas Cruise at 17500~ 203-212 ktas Another block of numbers; C210N with turbo normalized IO550F Density Altitude 7,200. Climb from 5780 base elevation. Full gross weight. 1000 fpm rate of climb Altitude 11,500-12,000 feet Cruise 196-198 KTAS 2450 RPM 16gph LOP 207-209 KTAS 2420 ROM 22gph ROP Altitude 14000 FT Cruise 198-202 KTAS 2430 RPM 16-16.5 gph LOP 206-210 KTAS 2430 RPM 21~ gph ROP Altitude 17,500-17,800 Cruise 207-211 KTAS 2410 RPM 14.8-15.4 gph LOP 209-218 KTAS 2410 RPM 21~ gph ROP -------------------- And for the 206 enthusiast; just test flew a U206 with our Turbo normalized IO550F engine. In the climb (Gross weight less 200 lbs): 1) 85-90 kias I saw a ROC up to 2,000 fpm with CHT's under 380 2500/32" 2) 100 kias 1383 (time to altitude) from 5780 to 16,500 temps 365 2500/32" In cruise; 16,500 2400/32 22gph 170-175 ktas (CHT's 340-380) 16,500 2400/32 14.5-15.2 160-165ktas (CHT's 320-350) 12,000 2400/32 22gph 163-168 ktas(CHT's 340-380) 12,000 2400/32 14.2-15.4 gph 158-162 ktas (CHT 320-360)
_________________ Kind Regards,
Eric Barker 970-901-5528 Cell Western Skyways http://www.westernskyways.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 26 Dec 2015, 01:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Vitatoe has done it with a 550: Vitatoe Aviation hangs an easy-breathing, cool-running, turbonormalized IO-550 on a P210, giving it a strong rate of climb and turbine speed at altitude.http://www.avweb.com/news/features/Turb ... 019-1.htmlI have seen one of those. I would not spend my money on going that direction.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 26 Dec 2015, 10:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2824 Post Likes: +2746 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Vitatoe has done it with a 550: Vitatoe Aviation hangs an easy-breathing, cool-running, turbonormalized IO-550 on a P210, giving it a strong rate of climb and turbine speed at altitude.http://www.avweb.com/news/features/Turb ... 019-1.htmlI have seen one of those. I would not spend my money on going that direction.
Ok, I'll bite. Why?
Everything I've read about the Vitatoe conversion has been extremely positive.
Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 26 Dec 2015, 14:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ok, I'll bite. Why?
Based on the install I saw, I would not write a $117k check. And that's just my opinion. Quote: Everything I've read about the Vitatoe conversion has been extremely positive.
Robert Everything you read in aviation magazines is sponsored content.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 26 Dec 2015, 16:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2824 Post Likes: +2746 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Everything you read in aviation magazines is sponsored content.
Well...in a word, no. That is a completely false accusation, and in any event, that's not where I read about the conversion. I've heard about it from P210 owners who are quite impressed with the conversion and the company. These are the guys who actually wrote the check, not just someone who looked under the hood. Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 26 Dec 2015, 16:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12835 Post Likes: +5276 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Everything you read in aviation magazines is sponsored content.
Well...in a word, no. That is a completely false accusation, and in any event, that's not where I read about the conversion. I've heard about it from P210 owners who are quite impressed with the conversion and the company. These are the guys who actually wrote the check, not just someone who looked under the hood. Robert
Aviation consumer seems objective - no advertising.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: George, Why not TN a P210 with a 520 Posted: 26 Dec 2015, 17:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/18/12 Posts: 1000 Post Likes: +432 Location: Atlanta
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Aviation consumer seems objective - no advertising. Do they have an article on it?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|