21 Nov 2025, 01:19 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 04 Nov 2015, 18:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/11/09 Posts: 1964 Post Likes: +300 Location: KSTJ
|
|
|
With the G5. Maybe around 2013. At least that is the oldest G5 on Controller
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 04 Nov 2015, 19:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/09/10 Posts: 3634 Post Likes: +865 Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
|
|
That's what I was thinking. WAY!!! out of my price range. I guess the only safe way to haul my family of 5 is in the baron. 
_________________ 520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737 5/19 737 5/18 E170/190 8/17 CL65 3/17 CE500
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 04 Nov 2015, 23:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's what I was thinking. WAY!!! out of my price range.
I'm not sure about that Matt! If you take the extra fuel burn times the 600 hours a year you fly you could afford a lot of things! 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 05 Nov 2015, 16:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/09/10 Posts: 3634 Post Likes: +865 Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's what I was thinking. WAY!!! out of my price range.
I'm not sure about that Matt! If you take the extra fuel burn times the 600 hours a year you fly you could afford a lot of things! 
Trust me I've done the math. Even at 600 hrs a year I'm not sure it would work. I'm a measly 300 hr a year pilot though.
If I could pay cash for a G5 well that would make a difference. But I can't even pay cash for my old Baron. Still have a loan on it.
But I can pay for 300 hrs a year of Baron fuel!
_________________ 520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737 5/19 737 5/18 E170/190 8/17 CL65 3/17 CE500
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 05 Nov 2015, 19:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/04/11 Posts: 521 Post Likes: +120 Location: Covington, GA
Aircraft: 421C, 58
|
|
|
TKS tanks were moved to the wing on the G3. G3 also had fiki versions, with a tank in each wing instead of just one. The G5 fuselage is the same width I believe, the extra room for the bench seat coming from slimmer side panels. They also went to an oleo nose strut vs. rubber pucks.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 05 Nov 2015, 23:51 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/09/11 Posts: 652 Post Likes: +102 Company: Aero Teknic Inc. Location: CYHU / Montreal St-Hubert
Aircraft: MU-2B-60, SR22,C182Q
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When did the 3 seat bench in the rear become an option? 2012 but it's for three small kids only. I expect they would fight ! If you need 5 real seats you can fill: Cessna 210, 206, maybe a TN A36 w/4000lbs MGTOW. To make 5 seats work every time in a single, you need to look at airplanes with >=3,800lbs MGTOW. Ideally 4,000lbs MGTOW like Cessna C/P/T210N or heavily modded 36 Bonanza... or a slowpoke Cherokee 6. -Pascal
_________________ http://www.wi-flight.net/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 06 Nov 2015, 00:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20751 Post Likes: +26230 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you need 5 real seats you can fill: Cessna 210 Rear two seats in 210 are not fully "real" from a space stand point. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus? Posted: 06 Nov 2015, 13:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/09/10 Posts: 3634 Post Likes: +865 Location: KPAN
Aircraft: PA12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When did the 3 seat bench in the rear become an option? 2012 but it's for three small kids only. I expect they would fight ! If you need 5 real seats you can fill: Cessna 210, 206, maybe a TN A36 w/4000lbs MGTOW. To make 5 seats work every time in a single, you need to look at airplanes with >=3,800lbs MGTOW. Ideally 4,000lbs MGTOW like Cessna C/P/T210N or heavily modded 36 Bonanza... or a slowpoke Cherokee 6. -Pascal
Yup that's what I thought. Nothing close enough in price range to give up the redundancy of the Baron.
_________________ 520 M35, 7ECA, CL65, CE550, E170/190, B737 5/19 737 5/18 E170/190 8/17 CL65 3/17 CE500
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|