banner
banner

27 Apr 2024, 00:44 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 09:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/06/13
Posts: 404
Post Likes: +247
Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
Rocky,

Are you flying N200WM? That our plane in the 80’s. WM is for William McKay, the friend who sold my dad the plane. We flew it out of 2600 ft in South Texas. I think Bill flew it out of his shorter ranch strip west of Fort Worth. Many fond memories of that airplane from the right seat.

Ed Lasater


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 10:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/25/12
Posts: 3732
Post Likes: +3714
Location: KRHV San Jose, CA
Aircraft: A36, R44, C525
That’s it. N200why me. Thanks for the background. I saw in the logs it was in Texas a lot.

_________________
Rocky Hill

Altitude is Everything.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 11:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/06/13
Posts: 404
Post Likes: +247
Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
Small world. McKay put the STOL kit on it. As part of the demo, they did a single engine takeoff. Glad the airplane is still flying.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 14:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/24/14
Posts: 1761
Post Likes: +2220
Username Protected wrote:
Small world. McKay put the STOL kit on it. As part of the demo, they did a single engine takeoff. Glad the airplane is still flying.

A single engine takeoff in a C340? Sorry, but I gotta call BS on that. You can't (at least I couldn't) taxi it on one engine in a straight line. I just don't see how you could possibly track a straight line to take off.

_________________
Jay


Last edited on 06 Jan 2020, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 15:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/06/13
Posts: 404
Post Likes: +247
Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
Single engine take-off in 421B with Robertson Stol. The story was conveyed to me by the owner of the plane/passenger.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 15:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/24/14
Posts: 1761
Post Likes: +2220
Username Protected wrote:
Single engine take-off in 421B with Robertson Stol. The story was conveyed to me by the owner of the plane/passenger.

Fair enough, I only have stick time in the 340.

_________________
Jay


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 15:12 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/06/13
Posts: 404
Post Likes: +247
Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
Just to be clear, I heard the story in the late 1980's- and I wasn't there when it happened. I am not going to the mat over the veracity, just saying what I remember hearing.

Ed


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 15:38 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 5599
Post Likes: +2559
Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
I agree with Jay... It's just about impossible to taxi a 421 on one engine also, much less try a takeoff. Runway length wouldn't be the issue as much as trying to keep it on the runway...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 15:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 11901
Post Likes: +2854
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
I agree with Jay... It's just about impossible to taxi a 421 on one engine also, much less try a takeoff. Runway length wouldn't be the issue as much as trying to keep it on the runway...


I have seen this posted before. The answer provided (again, no idea on veracity); was a single engine takeoff was simulating a V1 cut. So the plane was above MVC, but not yet at rotation speed when they shutdown the engine.

My info is not even second hand. More like third, and from the internet.

Hopefully someone else can provide some real data.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 06 Jan 2020, 15:53 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 6762
Post Likes: +4432
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
I have taxied my 421, 340, and Baron on one engine.
If you are exiting the runway SE just keep your speed up to the parking spot.
If you are stopped and have the space ,taxi in a circle until you get enough speed to go in the direction you want.

Back in the 1950’s Piper removed one prop from a 150 HP Apache and put it the cabin.
The TWO pilots then did a SE takeoff and flew from Texas to Florida if I remember correctly.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2020, 20:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1829
Post Likes: +1405
Location: 2IS
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
Back in the 1950’s Piper removed one prop from a 150 HP Apache and put it the cabin. The TWO pilots then did a SE takeoff and flew from Texas to Florida if I remember correctly.

Gerald, I think that was the Twin Commander.

"The Aero Commander was capable of taking off, flying and landing on a single engine while maintaining a high degree of stability. To prove this, and to enhance market recognition of the plane, in May of 1951, the Company successfully completed a flight from Oklahoma City to Washington DC loaded to full gross weight with one propeller removed from the plane. This was a first for the aviation industry and a strong demonstration of the asymmetric control and responsiveness of the Aero Commander."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2020, 22:08 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 6762
Post Likes: +4432
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Back in the 1950’s Piper removed one prop from a 150 HP Apache and put it the cabin. The TWO pilots then did a SE takeoff and flew from Texas to Florida if I remember correctly.

Gerald, I think that was the Twin Commander.

"The Aero Commander was capable of taking off, flying and landing on a single engine while maintaining a high degree of stability. To prove this, and to enhance market recognition of the plane, in May of 1951, the Company successfully completed a flight from Oklahoma City to Washington DC loaded to full gross weight with one propeller removed from the plane. This was a first for the aviation industry and a strong demonstration of the asymmetric control and responsiveness of the Aero Commander."



There was a Commander 500 that flew with one prop before the Apache .
The Apache was the second to successfully accomplish this feat.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2020, 23:25 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 30811
Post Likes: +10779
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Back in the 1950’s Piper removed one prop from a 150 HP Apache and put it the cabin. The TWO pilots then did a SE takeoff and flew from Texas to Florida if I remember correctly.

Gerald, I think that was the Twin Commander.

"The Aero Commander was capable of taking off, flying and landing on a single engine while maintaining a high degree of stability. To prove this, and to enhance market recognition of the plane, in May of 1951, the Company successfully completed a flight from Oklahoma City to Washington DC loaded to full gross weight with one propeller removed from the plane. This was a first for the aviation industry and a strong demonstration of the asymmetric control and responsiveness of the Aero Commander."

Given that without the Geronimo upgrade an Apache can barely stay in the air with only one engine it did seem rather hard to believe that one was possible to take off with only one engine.
_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 08 Jan 2020, 23:53 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 6762
Post Likes: +4432
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
It was an incredible feat with an Apache and there was a article in flying Magazine.

That’s where I read it, I am looking for my old copies of flying to find it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 09 Jan 2020, 00:10 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 6762
Post Likes: +4432
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
https://www.pipermuseum.com/Scanned%20A ... ngOut.html

Here it is Lance, It really happened.1,304 miles and over 12 hours.
Really amazing for an under powered Apache.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Marsh.jpg.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.