29 Nov 2025, 19:17 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
|
That's an easy question to answer.
Astra SPX
I just have to figure out how to deal with the copilot issue. I am starting to see that solution as well but it will take a bit of time to accept it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/22/11 Posts: 292 Post Likes: +35 Location: KTUP Tupelo, MS
Aircraft: Nothing currently
|
|
|
I didn't think an ultra required a copilot.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 20:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/18/11 Posts: 956 Post Likes: +142 Location: (KCYW) Kansas
Aircraft: PA28-140
|
|
Trust me, if you don’t already have Lear Jet history, you don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. Your best bet is look at a Beech Premier or Cessna Citation for around 1.5M.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 1569 Post Likes: +523 Location: Houston, TX USA
Aircraft: Learjet
|
|
|
I'll let you know. I have a late-serial number 35A under contract. I never thought I would own a two pilot airplane, but I never go anywhere without my bride and since she is a pilot I figure why not?
.80m cruise, 1800+ mile range, FL450, and since it's normally just the two of us, the dog, and a few bags, it should perform like a fighter!
_________________ Destroyer of the world’s finest aircraft since 1985.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +940
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's an easy question to answer.
Astra SPX
I just have to figure out how to deal with the copilot issue. I am starting to see that solution as well but it will take a bit of time to accept it. I have a little time in the Astra. Nice, fast airplane with good range. They can have flap/slat rigging issues. Otherwise, high dispatch rate.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/08/12 Posts: 1445 Post Likes: +940
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The co-pilot thing is a non-issue. Part 91 I believe the person in the right seat doesn't even need to be type rated???
It's a lot about range/speed, but mostly it's about reducing fixed costs as most jet maintenance programs assume 300 hours a year and it gets ridiculously expensive per hour at the sub-150 hour level per year.
Absolute minimum NBAA IFR range needs to be 1,400nm.
Keep hearing terrible things maintenance/dispatch reliability and support-wise regarding Westwinds.
-Pascal True. No type rating required for copilot. Multi, instrument and a 61.56 (?) check, which can be signed off by the typed pilot. Commercial needed if they are paid.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The co-pilot thing is a non-issue. Part 91 I believe the person in the right seat doesn't even need to be type rated???
It's a lot about range/speed, but mostly it's about reducing fixed costs as most jet maintenance programs assume 300 hours a year and it gets ridiculously expensive per hour at the sub-150 hour level per year.
Absolute minimum NBAA IFR range needs to be 1,400nm.
Keep hearing terrible things maintenance/dispatch reliability and support-wise regarding Westwinds.
-Pascal True. No type rating required for copilot. Multi, instrument and a 61.56 (?) check, which can be signed off by the typed pilot. Commercial needed if they are paid.
If you plan to fly to other parts of the globe your copilot will likely need to be typed. Not all countries enforce the requirement but I beleive it is an ICAO reg.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra Posted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 2794 Post Likes: +1410 Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Premier 1A real word range seems way too short: 1,125nm?
Which Lear rabbit hole? Looking for arguments for/against Lear 31/35 compared to V/Ultra.
I really like the idea of a Dual G600/GTN Citation 560 (Jettech STC).
No room in small Lear panels to upgrade (no room in cockpit, period!).
-Pascal If you are looking at the Jettech STC Garmin install for Citation 560s, I would verify that STC applies to an Ultra. Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|