banner
banner

29 Nov 2025, 19:17 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/11
Posts: 652
Post Likes: +102
Company: Aero Teknic Inc.
Location: CYHU / Montreal St-Hubert
Aircraft: MU-2B-60, SR22,C182Q
At first glance... the 30-series Lears seem to have mostly hour-driven and landing-driven inspections. 300 / 600 / 1200 /2400 hour inspections and 3000 and 6000 landing inspections. That would seem to favor low-utilization users. The "killer" item would appear to be the 12 calender year inspection... or hitting any gear time landing limits.

Richard Bacon has a low utilization maintenance program for the Lear 35. I haven't had to chance to find out what it stretches out.

Compared to most Citations, Lears with TFE-731's tend to be on Engine programs. That's good as (almost) nobody wants to pay the bill to re-engine an older Citation.

Ignoring the need for a co-pilot, what are you thoughts on Citation V/Ultra versus a Lear 35 or 31A/ER from complete ownership cost point of view (say over 6 years) for someone flying at most 100 hours a year ?

My gut tells me that a Citation V/Ultra on Bacon's low utilization program would be hard to beat cost-wise, but the Lears of course have lots more ramp appeal and yes they are faster and longer range/payload seems a given.

What would you buy with say a $1.5M acquisition budget ?

-Pascal

_________________
http://www.wi-flight.net/


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:22 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
That's an easy question to answer.

Astra SPX

I just have to figure out how to deal with the copilot issue. I am starting to see that solution as well but it will take a bit of time to accept it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:23 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/08/12
Posts: 1319
Post Likes: +45
Company: David R. Brien, Esq.
Location: Hidden Hills, CA (KCMA)
Aircraft: 1981 Bonanza A36TC
For 1.5 you could probably get a Premiere 1A

_________________
G35, Piper Malibu


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
100 hours a year and you're looking at planes that require a copilot? I "guess" I can see it both ways. If I flew 100 hours a year I'd forget how to fly.

However, buying a Lear 35 is super cheap. Hire a couple guys. I guess it's cheaper than NetJets. Is it cheaper than NetJets?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/22/11
Posts: 292
Post Likes: +35
Location: KTUP Tupelo, MS
Aircraft: Nothing currently
I didn't think an ultra required a copilot.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 19:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/11
Posts: 652
Post Likes: +102
Company: Aero Teknic Inc.
Location: CYHU / Montreal St-Hubert
Aircraft: MU-2B-60, SR22,C182Q
The co-pilot thing is a non-issue. Part 91 I believe the person in the right seat doesn't even need to be type rated???

It's a lot about range/speed, but mostly it's about reducing fixed costs as most jet maintenance programs assume 300 hours a year and it gets ridiculously expensive per hour at the sub-150 hour level per year.

Absolute minimum NBAA IFR range needs to be 1,400nm.


Keep hearing terrible things maintenance/dispatch reliability and support-wise regarding Westwinds.

-Pascal

_________________
http://www.wi-flight.net/


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 20:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/18/11
Posts: 956
Post Likes: +142
Location: (KCYW) Kansas
Aircraft: PA28-140
Trust me, if you don’t already have Lear Jet history, you don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. :tape:

Your best bet is look at a Beech Premier or Cessna Citation for around 1.5M.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 20:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/11
Posts: 652
Post Likes: +102
Company: Aero Teknic Inc.
Location: CYHU / Montreal St-Hubert
Aircraft: MU-2B-60, SR22,C182Q
Premier 1A real word range seems way too short: 1,125nm?

Which Lear rabbit hole? Looking for arguments for/against Lear 31/35 compared to V/Ultra.

I really like the idea of a Dual G600/GTN Citation 560 (Jettech STC).

No room in small Lear panels to upgrade (no room in cockpit, period!).

-Pascal

_________________
http://www.wi-flight.net/


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:20 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 1569
Post Likes: +523
Location: Houston, TX USA
Aircraft: Learjet
I'll let you know. I have a late-serial number 35A under contract. I never thought I would own a two pilot airplane, but I never go anywhere without my bride and since she is a pilot I figure why not?

.80m cruise, 1800+ mile range, FL450, and since it's normally just the two of us, the dog, and a few bags, it should perform like a fighter!

_________________
Destroyer of the world’s finest aircraft since 1985.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +940
Username Protected wrote:
That's an easy question to answer.

Astra SPX

I just have to figure out how to deal with the copilot issue. I am starting to see that solution as well but it will take a bit of time to accept it.


I have a little time in the Astra. Nice, fast airplane with good range. They can have flap/slat rigging issues. Otherwise, high dispatch rate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:44 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/16/09
Posts: 7319
Post Likes: +2198
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: BE-TBD
If you're looking at Lear 35's you would also want to consider the falcon 10.

Fun to think along these lines :)

_________________
AI generated post. Any misrepresentation, inaccuracies or omissions not attributable to member.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/08/12
Posts: 1445
Post Likes: +940
Username Protected wrote:
The co-pilot thing is a non-issue. Part 91 I believe the person in the right seat doesn't even need to be type rated???

It's a lot about range/speed, but mostly it's about reducing fixed costs as most jet maintenance programs assume 300 hours a year and it gets ridiculously expensive per hour at the sub-150 hour level per year.

Absolute minimum NBAA IFR range needs to be 1,400nm.


Keep hearing terrible things maintenance/dispatch reliability and support-wise regarding Westwinds.

-Pascal


True. No type rating required for copilot. Multi, instrument and a 61.56 (?) check, which can be signed off by the typed pilot. Commercial needed if they are paid.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:
The co-pilot thing is a non-issue. Part 91 I believe the person in the right seat doesn't even need to be type rated???

It's a lot about range/speed, but mostly it's about reducing fixed costs as most jet maintenance programs assume 300 hours a year and it gets ridiculously expensive per hour at the sub-150 hour level per year.

Absolute minimum NBAA IFR range needs to be 1,400nm.


Keep hearing terrible things maintenance/dispatch reliability and support-wise regarding Westwinds.

-Pascal


True. No type rating required for copilot. Multi, instrument and a 61.56 (?) check, which can be signed off by the typed pilot. Commercial needed if they are paid.


If you plan to fly to other parts of the globe your copilot will likely need to be typed. Not all countries enforce the requirement but I beleive it is an ICAO reg.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:53 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 2794
Post Likes: +1410
Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
Username Protected wrote:
Premier 1A real word range seems way too short: 1,125nm?

Which Lear rabbit hole? Looking for arguments for/against Lear 31/35 compared to V/Ultra.

I really like the idea of a Dual G600/GTN Citation 560 (Jettech STC).

No room in small Lear panels to upgrade (no room in cockpit, period!).

-Pascal


If you are looking at the Jettech STC Garmin install for Citation 560s, I would verify that STC applies to an Ultra.
Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Lear 30-series vs. Citation V/Ultra
PostPosted: 08 Feb 2015, 22:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/30/12
Posts: 2388
Post Likes: +364
Company: Aerlogix, Jet Aeronautical
Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: B-55, RV-6
Lear 35, one of the best looking planes ever made and a great performer. My friend's just got out of the gear overhaul. Quoted $150k, came out at $275k. There were a couple extras in there, but as I heard the majority really was the gear. Hmmmm...


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.