18 Apr 2024, 01:20 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 08:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Comparing a B55 to any Aerostar is a stretch. They ARE both twin engine airplanes. The B55 is a great, and I mean GREAT, airplane, and did I not have the A*, it is the easiest high performance twin to buy and own, IMO. But: When you are trying to figure cost, remember that it is simple: you count systems; each system has a maintenance cost. The basic airframe comparison would not favor either airplane, IMO. The Baron has magnesium control surfaces spar crack issues and fuel bladders The A* has a bladder as the fuselage tank but much easier to repair/replace, IMO. The A*'s wet wings are a smaller maintenance matter, IMO. The A* has hydraulic gear and flaps which require more maintenance than the Baorn's electric IMO. The A* has hydraulic nose steering, not big deal but it does require a modicum of maintenance. The A* has a spar corrosion inspection that cost about $50 to perform and corrosion is a true rarity unless the airplane has been poorly maintained. The A* is turbo charged and there are 4 turbos, Adam alluded to the estimate of 1000 hour mean time between failure and I would agree. He says $1500 to rebuild, I don't know but figure that he does. The A* is pressurized. There is occasional maintenance to the system and to the pressure vessel, i.e. fuselage. I have had to fix one vessel leak: $50. You should also remember that with any avionics alterations that are cabled outside the pressure vessel will require additional attention and time. I would consider the maintenance/operating cost of the 290 HP engined A* to be about the same as a turbo 310 and less than a Cessna 414 and also less than a 58P. I flew a Mooney Bravo for 8 years and I keep detailed records of maintenance. I can still bring up every penny, or my book keeper can, that I spent on that airplane. To date, I would say that the A* operates for about 75-80% more. Jgreen
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 08:50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 02/09/09 Posts: 5586 Post Likes: +2544 Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
|
|
I've owned a B55 and now a 601P, Superstar 700. To be completely fair, the Aerostar also has spar issues. I was told there are those have have, and those that will. I have the 55% repair on mine on the left wing.
You are correct though, comparing the Baron and an Aerostar is like comparing apples to oranges. They are both round, but completely different airplanes. I'd rather work in the cabin on the Aerostar than the B55, especially avionics. Let's not even talk about fuel pump location or the nose wheel steering! But what a genius idea to use the same part number for both horizontal stabilizers and the vertical stabilizer, and again between the elevators and rudder in the Aerostar!
The Baron is much easier to hangar. It'll fit anywhere. The Aerostar is a tall airplane with a very aft mounted wing making it difficult to find places to put it.
Which would I rather fly... either.. They are both great airplanes, just different. I think the Aerostar flies like a jet. I like to see 200 knots ground speed with a headwind in the Aerostar. I like the ability to fly a Baron off a short grass runway if needed. In my case I didn't go looking for either airplane, the B55 was an impulse buy, and the Aerostar just about fell in my lap.
Just my short $0.02 worth..
Jason
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 10:50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Which would I rather fly... either.. They are both great airplanes, just different. I think the Aerostar flies like a jet. I like to see 200 knots ground speed with a headwind in the Aerostar. I like the ability to fly a Baron off a short grass runway if needed. If you want to do all of the above, plus turbine and 300 knots, for about the same $/mile, ... Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 10:59 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +767
Aircraft: 737
|
|
I own both. The Mitsubishi is actually less expensive to operate on trips greater than 300NM. It is faster, it's more reliable, it carries more, range is better, but...
Nothing flies like an Aerostar.
Best to keep both, lol. Also, to be fair, I'm only getting like 295 out of the MU2 in the summer.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 13:19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I own both. The Mitsubishi is actually less expensive to operate on trips greater than 300NM. It is faster, it's more reliable, it carries more, range is better, but...
Nothing flies like an Aerostar.
Best to keep both, lol. Also, to be fair, I'm only getting like 295 out of the MU2 in the summer.
Only 295? I would not have one, what a slug! You know, of course, that I am "green" with envy. Last week, I was at Carpenter Avionics getting some work done on the A* and an estimate for some more upgrades. Next door, there is an operation that specializes in MU-2 training. Seven thousand for the ground school and 15 hours of instruction in the airplane, plus fifteen hours of flight time at $750/hr. dry. Jgreen
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 13:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
I was looking for a picture of some Decathlon wheel pants that I want to sell and came across this. Just thought it might be relevant considering the comparison to a B-55. This was taken on a low altitude, 6500', flight back from Nashville. It is ROP, about 52% power, 180 knots true and 24 gph.
Pretty much B-55 economy.
Jgreen
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 17:53 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Seven thousand for the ground school and 15 hours of instruction in the airplane, plus fifteen hours of flight time at $750/hr. dry. :sad: Perhaps the greatest impact of the SFAR is the self selection of pilots who don't want to train to that high a level of proficiency. I personally enjoy it, but there are those who see it as a burden. To be as proficient in a piston twin will require a similar time investment, but at less cost. Most piston twin pilots don't achieve that. The recurrent training is much less than the initial, of course. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 23:31 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/18/13 Posts: 1152 Post Likes: +767
Aircraft: 737
|
|
I agree with Mike. That's Reese's shop over there next to Carpenter, he (and Jerry) are worth every penny. I've trained with them twice in the last year, so I've spent even more, but if I pop a motor I'm going to be more irritated than terrified.
You can't take it with you, but you sure can get dead faster by saving money on training. That's not at all directed at you John, just a general comment.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 27 Sep 2015, 00:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
You may rest assured that if I were going the MU-2 route, I would not skimp on training. The FAA mandated training took the MU-2 from the worst accident record among turbo props to the best in short order. My is simply that spending $20,000 "for funsies" without buying an airplane to fly isn't going to happen. Jgreen
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 08:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Craig's post on what he uses for approach speeds, though different than my own procedure, brought something to mind. I HAVE NEVER ESTABLISHED THE GAIT FOR A SINGLE ENGINE, GEAR DOWN, 20 DEGREE FLAP APPROACH. Though I have done them multiple times, I never committed to memory, the power required on the good engine to maintain my desired approach speed in that configuration. I have put the airplane in that configuration to determine power to maintain altitude at blue line, which I'm pretty sure was 23" MAP and 2500 RPM. Both these numbers need to be verified by me which I will do at the first opportunity. I wanted to fly this weekend but had the grandson in for a visit. Will do and report the power configurations here. Jgreen
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 08:43 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13101 Post Likes: +6970
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Craig's post on what he uses for approach speeds, though different than my own procedure, brought something to mind.
I HAVE NEVER ESTABLISHED THE GAIT FOR A SINGLE ENGINE, GEAR DOWN, 20 DEGREE FLAP APPROACH.
Though I have done them multiple times, I never committed to memory, the power required on the good engine to maintain my desired approach speed in that configuration. :oops:
I have put the airplane in that configuration to determine power to maintain altitude at blue line, which I'm pretty sure was 23" MAP and 2500 RPM.
Both these numbers need to be verified by me which I will do at the first opportunity. I wanted to fly this weekend but had the grandson in for a visit.
Will do and report the power configurations here.
Jgreen In my experience, that setting will vary significantly based on weight and OAT. Take a video...we need more vids of OEI ops. Best,
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 20:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Jesse, You are absolutely correct about the changes with weight. Problem is, getting the airplane near gross would entail passengers. I don't think any of my "friends" would appreciate me shutting down an engine with them aboard. You got to admit though, the thought of it is I'm going to do it with just me and Sweetie, my dog, and close to full fuel. I'll get Stan Musick to do some "gaiting" with me too, but he has lost some weight as you might notice from the pic I posted of him in Babble this morning. Anyway, it's something that I do regularly, practice that is, and I'll post all my results. I do know one thing. With gear down and full flaps, the A* ain't going nowhere on one engine, but I'll post that too. Jgreen
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 23:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9168 Post Likes: +17162 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Forrest, I'll document all the info I can. I wrote down some info on single engine performance before and don't know where I put it. I need a co-pilot. Hard to hand fly with one caged and write at the same time. I may have to get with Stan. Last time I flew with him, he shut one off on approach while i was under the hood and made me land like that, but not before killing my gear down lights and chewing my butt out because I didn't say something. I saw it, just didn't seem important at the time. Jgreen
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|