banner
banner

08 Jun 2025, 08:04 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2015, 09:25 
Offline


User avatar
 YIM  Profile




Joined: 07/12/09
Posts: 3618
Post Likes: +1190
Company: Leopold Aero, LLC
Location: KPTW Heritage Field Pottstown, PA
Aircraft: 1978 Baron E55
I've always thought the P337 had ramp appeal because it looks unusual. Here is a nice one for sale.

http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/CESSNA-P337-SKYROCKET/1976-CESSNA-P337-SKYROCKET/1319627.htm

What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
Are they maintenance pigs?
Do they fly LOP?

:popcorn:

_________________
The advice you get is worth what you paid for it...
Mike Dechnik
KPTW '78 E55


Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2015, 11:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/19/08
Posts: 12160
Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
Username Protected wrote:
I've always thought the P337 had ramp appeal because it looks unusual. Here is a nice one for sale.

http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/CESSNA-P337-SKYROCKET/1976-CESSNA-P337-SKYROCKET/1319627.htm

What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
Are they maintenance pigs?
Do they fly LOP?

:popcorn:


IMO they are noisy and have no baggage room.

_________________
The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2015, 12:03 
Offline


User avatar
 YIM  Profile




Joined: 07/12/09
Posts: 3618
Post Likes: +1190
Company: Leopold Aero, LLC
Location: KPTW Heritage Field Pottstown, PA
Aircraft: 1978 Baron E55
I was thinking the same about the luggage, and the one in the ad has a luggage pod added to the bottom.

Never thought about the noise, but with the engine sitting out front, makes sense. Wondering how much the noise the rear engine makes?

_________________
The advice you get is worth what you paid for it...
Mike Dechnik
KPTW '78 E55


Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2015, 12:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20289
Post Likes: +25423
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Are they maintenance pigs?

That's the reputation.

Unlike conventional twins, the engines are packed into tight compartments that are hard to work on.

And then you add the folding leg Cessna landing gear which isn't the most reliable.

And then you add a rear engine which can suffer cooling problems (it depends on the prop wash from the front engine to cool it while on the ground).

For the same money and less aggravation, buy a 310 or a Baron. They will run circles around a Skymasher.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2015, 12:22 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/09
Posts: 4292
Post Likes: +2975
Company: To be announced
Aircraft: N/A
Run..... :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

_________________
God created Aircraft Mechanics so Pilots could have heros.
I'd rather be fishing with Andy and Opie


Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2015, 17:57 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/11/09
Posts: 1376
Post Likes: +490
Company: UNLV
Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
Username Protected wrote:
I've always thought the P337 had ramp appeal because it looks unusual. Here is a nice one for sale. What do you like about them? What do you dislike about them? Are they maintenance pigs? Do they fly LOP?


I can't speak to the Skyrocket but I have a regular P337. I haven't had any particular maintenance issues that would be specific to the airframe and my P337 is in annual now so I can provide more data soon on maintenance expenses.

Contrary to what others have said, the P337 is not noisy at all. I can hardly hear the rear engine start and that's without headsets on. Possibly non "P" models are louder. The P is also a five place airplane as it doesn't have a second exit so cannot be certified as a six place airplane. Luggage goes where the sixth seat would be.

Look for other threads here that I have replied to but I get in the low 182 KTAS on 10.6 GPH per engine LOP at 65% power. ROP or higher power settings give faster TAS, of course.

Pressurization is wonderful !

_________________
Ken Reed
57AZ


Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2015, 00:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/05/09
Posts: 344
Post Likes: +186
Location: Portland, Oregon
Aircraft: MU-2F
Username Protected wrote:
I've always thought the P337 had ramp appeal because it looks unusual. Here is a nice one for sale. What do you like about them? What do you dislike about them? Are they maintenance pigs? Do they fly LOP?


I had a P337 for three years. Maintenance wasn't an issue any more than it would be for any other pressurized twin. The rear engine is easier to work on than the front one actually, because there is a removable panel in the rear cabin bulkhead allowing access to the mags and alternator. The biggest issue I had was lack of cabin load with full fuel (148 gallons), only 400lbs for my plane which had air conditioning, intercoolers and full deice. No 337 is FIKI BTW. Flying LOP was no problem, 184KTAS on 23gph total, ~50LOP. I liked the plane, but a P210 will do the same or better in all respects on 2/3 the $$$, plus the P210 can be FIKI and can fly 3000 ft higher. If you have to have a twin though, the P337 is the best short field P twin, has the best single engine performance of any P twin until you are looking at something like a 421, and it won't bite if you loose an engine, you just have to realize you did loose one, and figure out which one.....I miss that plane in some respects. Wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Tell me about the P337 Skyrocket
PostPosted: 01 Aug 2015, 15:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/27/09
Posts: 1096
Post Likes: +623
Location: Knoxville TN
Aircraft: C150J
The 337 reminds me of the piper tomahawk. Lots of people with no or little experience in the make have all kinds of opinions about how they suck when the opposite is true. I can defend the t hawk till the cows come home and I just get a blank look follow by, "yea but it doesn't have all the spars, won't recover from a spin, blah blah blah...". Oh well. Any way it is good to hear from people who own the plane.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.camguard.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.