07 Jun 2025, 11:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 19:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/27/08 Posts: 410 Post Likes: +30 Location: Scottsdale
Aircraft: King Air C90XP
|
|
So what is the practical protocol for the light jet pilots who fly SP and cruise up high on a routine basis? It appears all the light jets predicate their range assumptions so far high up, at 41,000 feet. Even the mustang's range map is predicated at 41,000 feet. http://cessna.txtav.com/aircraft-range-toolThese altitudes sound great, but wow that is way high up there! Even higher than routine commercial airline flights (which obviously have dual crews) Do you actually have the quick donning mask around your neck on a routine basis? Do you wear it?
_________________ Reg Cooper
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 21:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/13 Posts: 615 Post Likes: +128
|
|
The entire rule is bullshit and nobody obeys it including net jet pilots.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 21:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/27/08 Posts: 410 Post Likes: +30 Location: Scottsdale
Aircraft: King Air C90XP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The entire rule is bullshit and nobody obeys it including net jet pilots. That is what I understand too. However, if I buy a light jet and want to get max performance out of it and take it to FL410 solo / SP I should be wearing a mask. Right?
_________________ Reg Cooper
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 21:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/30/12 Posts: 2388 Post Likes: +364 Company: Aerlogix, Jet Aeronautical Location: Prescott, AZ
Aircraft: B-55, RV-6
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The entire rule is bullshit and nobody obeys it including net jet pilots. Not my experience at all. Why is this rule bull.....? Have you been through a decompression at FL 410 or above? I've been through one at FL 350, it's not a joking matter. You've got about 10 seconds before the lights go out, depending on how you, individually, react to the situation. Above FL 450 you have no chance. You must be basing this on the, it's never going to happen anyway line?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/25/13 Posts: 176 Post Likes: +22
Aircraft: B58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The entire rule is bullshit and nobody obeys it including net jet pilots. WOW! It may be BS but look up what your TUC is at 410 in the event of a loss of cabin pressure. Cut that in half if it is a rapid decompression. It probably won't happen but if it does you'll be unconscious in about 5-10 seconds without a mask; if your a triathlete. If you're in a lesser state of fitness it will be even shorter. I would wear the mask.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The entire rule is bullshit and nobody obeys it including net jet pilots. Yea, I agree it is stupid to obey the regs and be safe, especially when you don't fly jets at 41k.
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:33 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3499 Post Likes: +2473 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
With a rapid decompression at FL410, you have about 7 seconds. The regs require you to have a mask donned at that altitude. However, it is the single most violated regulation in aviation. Why? Because it hardly ever happens. Some airplanes are probably less likely to have it happen than others, but if it does happen, having the mask on is only going to give you a chance. There will be so many other things working against you both physiologically and operationally, you'll have to rely on some luck to get through it. One feature I really like in the Mustang is the Emergency Descent Mode (EDM). If you have a cabin decompression, all you have to do is idle the throttles, drop the gear, and throw out the speed brakes. Hopefully, you can stay focused enough to do that. The autopilot will automatically turn 90 degrees left and do an emergency descent to 15,000 feet. It takes about 2:20 to drop to 15,000 from 41,000. At that point, hopefully you still have a chance to execute a landing somewhere. There is yet to be a rapid decompression in a Mustang, and hopefully there never will be.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
Last edited on 07 May 2015, 22:35, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/13 Posts: 615 Post Likes: +128
|
|
Nobody obeys the rule. It exists only in US of A because of Payne Stewart. There have been two rapid decompression events worldwide in the last 40 years in twin jets that were not accompanied by structural failure. Let's go thru this topic again with everyone disagreeing, because I said it was BS. Then let's pull up everyones YouTube account BSing around at FL410 or FL450 or FL510 with nobody wearing a mask in the cockpit, even when the co-pilot goes to take a leak. Rapid decompression is about 1000x less likely in a twin jet than PT6 shitting on you in a PC12 or TBM. Nobody wears a mask in a twin jet. Just landed in Austria two days ago. Pilots took a leak multiple times in 10 hours from Omaha to Vienna. Nobody wore a mask the whole time. We were IMC the whole time because of cigar smoke.
Last edited on 07 May 2015, 22:50, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:37 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3499 Post Likes: +2473 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
You have wear it above FL350. Yes, there is enough O2 to get you through the flight, but you'll be refilling the bottle before the next flight. I agree in that virtually everyone violates the rule, but it's still the rule. It's kind of like preparing for something that is almost certain to never happen.
Another thing I learned at Flight Safety was the procedure for dealing with an engine fire. Some people wonder why the Mustang only has one Halon bottle for engine fires. Well, Cessna has been building Citations since 1969. Any idea how many Citation engine fires have occurred since 1969? ZERO. That's right. There's never been one. Yet, the FAA requires a fire suppression system. Not a bad idea, but it is yet to be tested on an actual fire. Thus, why have more than one bottle?
Jets have a bunch of things you prepare for that you're highly unlikely to experience.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/13 Posts: 615 Post Likes: +128
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You have wear it above FL350. Yes, there is enough O2 to get you through the flight, but you'll be refilling the bottle before the next flight. I assume you're going to sweat into your face for hours at a time wearing that nasty rubber thingy every time you go east to catch a tailwind. Yeah, right. Can you say "Say Again". Some amazing microphones in them things...
Last edited on 07 May 2015, 22:48, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Light Jets, Oxygen Masks and Practical Protocol Posted: 07 May 2015, 22:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/13 Posts: 615 Post Likes: +128
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You have wear it above FL350. Yes, there is enough O2 to get you through the flight, but you'll be refilling the bottle before the next flight. I agree in that virtually everyone violates the rule, but it's still the rule. It's kind of like preparing for something that is almost certain to never happen.
Another thing I learned at Flight Safety was the procedure for dealing with an engine fire. Some people wonder why the Mustang only has one Halon bottle for engine fires. Well, Cessna has been building Citations since 1969. Any idea how many Citation engine fires have occurred since 1969? ZERO. That's right. There's never been one. Yet, the FAA requires a fire suppression system. Not a bad idea, but it is yet to be tested on an actual fire. Thus, why have more than one bottle?
Jets have a bunch of things you prepare for that you're highly unlikely to experience. No %#$@...
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|