banner
banner

12 Nov 2025, 03:50 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 27 Dec 2013, 23:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Hypothetically, I'm curious to know how many people here would be willing to purchase an experimental airplane that is built about the size of a B36TC (possibly slightly larger) but made of carbon fiber, 6.5 psi pressure, 6 seats, forward baggage as well as in cabin, 1000 lbs useful load, 1300 nm range at 300 kts on ~40-45 gph.

I have some really good ideas and think that it can be done. I know it wouldn't be a cabin class airplane, but a 300 kt airplane would get you to your destination much faster thus you won't have to be in the smaller cabin for as long.

All this for the $1-1.3m range. What say you?


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 00:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12190
Post Likes: +3074
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Hypothetically, I'm curious to know how many people here would be willing to purchase an experimental airplane that is built about the size of a B36TC (possibly slightly larger) but made of carbon fiber, 6.5 psi pressure, 6 seats, forward baggage as well as in cabin, 1000 lbs useful load, 1300 nm range at 300 kts on ~40-45 gph.

I have some really good ideas and think that it can be done. I know it wouldn't be a cabin class airplane, but a 300 kt airplane would get you to your destination much faster thus you won't have to be in the smaller cabin for as long.

All this for the $1-1.3m range. What say you?


Gerry,

Lancair Evolution is selling just fine.
It is outside my price range, but obviously they sell enough to stay in business.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 00:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
Hypothetically, I'm curious to know how many people here would be willing to purchase an experimental airplane that is built about the size of a B36TC (possibly slightly larger) but made of carbon fiber, 6.5 psi pressure, 6 seats, forward baggage as well as in cabin, 1000 lbs useful load, 1300 nm range at 300 kts on ~40-45 gph.

I have some really good ideas and think that it can be done. I know it wouldn't be a cabin class airplane, but a 300 kt airplane would get you to your destination much faster thus you won't have to be in the smaller cabin for as long.

All this for the $1-1.3m range. What say you?


Gerry,

Lancair Evolution is selling just fine.
It is outside my price range, but obviously they sell enough to stay in business.

Tim


I like the Evolution, but it's only 4 seats. I wish they would have made it a 6 seater and then I'd be sold. That's the point of what I'm asking here. Who would still buy the 4 seat Evolution if there was a 6 seat option available?

Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 00:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6062
Post Likes: +714
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
It wont happen. What you are talking about is an Epic and it cost $2m.
Its an homebuilt with all its drawback.





Username Protected wrote:
Hypothetically, I'm curious to know how many people here would be willing to purchase an experimental airplane that is built about the size of a B36TC (possibly slightly larger) but made of carbon fiber, 6.5 psi pressure, 6 seats, forward baggage as well as in cabin, 1000 lbs useful load, 1300 nm range at 300 kts on ~40-45 gph.

I have some really good ideas and think that it can be done. I know it wouldn't be a cabin class airplane, but a 300 kt airplane would get you to your destination much faster thus you won't have to be in the smaller cabin for as long.

All this for the $1-1.3m range. What say you?

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 00:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Not me.

I want to be able to sell my stuff when I'm ready.


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 01:04 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6062
Post Likes: +714
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
Are you talking about the SA Ravin 700TP?

http://www.saravin.com/Newsletter.html

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 02:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/06/11
Posts: 2930
Post Likes: +1675
Location: Missouri
Aircraft: C-120 RV8
I don't see many people pumping 1.3 million into an experimental and I especially don't see many people that can afford a 1.3 million dollar airplane spending the time it would take to build an airplane of this complexity.

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 03:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Ok... so far negative nancys. Not what I was looking for but I guess it's feedback.


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 03:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
Are you talking about the SA Ravin 700TP?

http://www.saravin.com/Newsletter.html


Never heard of this before.


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 04:03 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
Hypothetically, I'm curious to know how many people here would be willing to purchase an experimental airplane that is built about the size of a B36TC (possibly slightly larger) but made of carbon fiber, 6.5 psi pressure, 6 seats, forward baggage as well as in cabin, 1000 lbs useful load, 1300 nm range at 300 kts on ~40-45 gph.

I have some really good ideas and think that it can be done. I know it wouldn't be a cabin class airplane, but a 300 kt airplane would get you to your destination much faster thus you won't have to be in the smaller cabin for as long.

All this for the $1-1.3m range. What say you?


It wont happen. What you are talking about is an Epic and it cost $2m.
Its an homebuilt with all its drawback.


Well, I think it can happen. The epic is a nice thought but IMO is too much money to buy and fly for the performance. What I suggested would be smaller, more like a Baron. Maybe slightly bigger. Cost at the $1m range would put this plane in the wheelhouse of just about every person that buys a new Bonanza, Cirrus, etc. I know if I was looking for a new plane it would be very had to pass up something like this, experimental or no.

Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 04:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
I don't see many people pumping 1.3 million into an experimental and I especially don't see many people that can afford a 1.3 million dollar airplane spending the time it would take to build an airplane of this complexity.

Robert


Well, all I can say is Lancair has been selling experimental planes for years now. So there has to be a market. Plus, I read somewhere that the home built market is growing 90% faster than the certified market. Sounds like things are shifting this direction. BTW, the plane I'd like to build, I would try to design it to comply with FAR part 23 so that potentially some day it could be certified.


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 07:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
Full disclosure: I'm a used aircraft kinda guy. No way would I buy a new G36 over my A36, even though the G36 is nicer in several ways.

If I was going to spend $1.3MM and had your proposed airplane's mission in mind, I'd be looking at an older TBM. Certified, turbine, proven, built, readily marketable, and has a much nicer cabin than the B36-class airplane.

I admit that I don't understand the pilots who plunk down the better part of a million to be the first guy to own a new G36, so I'm sure there is a segment of the airplane buying market who disagrees with me and may agree with you. Even they might be reluctant to bet on a brand-new, experimental, new composite material design.

I wish you the best of luck, and love seeing innovators bring ideas to aviation. I worry that your uphill climb is a steep one, though.


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 10:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/17/10
Posts: 1626
Post Likes: +276
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
Full disclosure: I'm a used aircraft kinda guy. No way would I buy a new G36 over my A36, even though the G36 is nicer in several ways.

If I was going to spend $1.3MM and had your proposed airplane's mission in mind, I'd be looking at an older TBM. Certified, turbine, proven, built, readily marketable, and has a much nicer cabin than the B36-class airplane.

I admit that I don't understand the pilots who plunk down the better part of a million to be the first guy to own a new G36, so I'm sure there is a segment of the airplane buying market who disagrees with me and may agree with you. Even they might be reluctant to bet on a brand-new, experimental, new composite material design.

I wish you the best of luck, and love seeing innovators bring ideas to aviation. I worry that your uphill climb is a steep one, though.


Yes, a TBM would be a very good choice. I guess my goal is to bring that kind of performance to the market at a price point that many could get in to as well as having a much lower cost on parts for annual, and significantly lower operating cost. The biggest reason why a TBM can be hard for some to swallow is because of the $20-40k annual costs (if we are referring to a comparably priced TBM). I've just recently been convinced of two things. Composite is the wave of the future. Extremely light and strong, doesn't lose strength when it flexes (like all metals do) and it essentially gives an airplane no hull life limit. On top of that and if you want real performance with safety the only place to innovate is in the experimental market.

Beechcraft is a perfect example. When was the last time they innovated with the Bonanza? The market place has been pretty stagnant from an innovation standpoint because of how restrictive the FAA certification process is.


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 11:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/08/13
Posts: 762
Post Likes: +181
Company: Gene's Mountain View Auto
Location: 4B0 Upstate NY/ VRB Florida
Aircraft: 67 Debonair C33A
The problem with Experimentals ( and I've had a few), is the time to build them ( unless you're retired) and the resell process. Yes, they offer so many advantages it's no wonder why many people take the leap. BUT many are offered for sale down the road partially completed due to the lack of time to finish the kit. And, try to sell one once it's been completed.......unless it's an Oshkosh award winner or a super, giveaway deal you'll have it for a looooonnnggg time. Also, insuring one can be more difficult than a production plane. I don't want to dissuade you....aviation NEEDS people to dream and try, it's how we got here in the first place. But be careful to research all before you jump in.
Good luck!


Top

 Post subject: Re: OT: Experimental
PostPosted: 28 Dec 2013, 11:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/05/09
Posts: 67
Post Likes: +3
Aircraft: Bonanza A36
Something along the lines of an Extra EA-500?
Always wondered why the EA-400 never caught on.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.