banner
banner

19 Apr 2024, 16:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Aviation Fabricators (Top Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 12:51 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/07/08
Posts: 5527
Post Likes: +3837
Location: Fort Worth, TX (KFTW)
Aircraft: B200, ex 58P
Username Protected wrote:
I understand Cirrus may be having some issues with the fuel tank switchover valve. It’s a purchased part.
In this plane , on automatic, the thing switches tanks every two minutes. Well, it isn’t. Also troubles with the manual mode on his same valve.
Anyone else heard his?

Rube Goldberg would be proud.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 13:58 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
In all seriousness, seems like the wing tanks should be pressurized off bleed air and feed a smaller center tank that's always full.

There are a myriad of ways that could go bad. It doesn't take very many PSI before you blow a wing skin off for example.

Also, when a wing gets heavier, it is easier for the more empty tank to transfer since it is uphill, so it is unstable to a certain degree.

If you build some sort of leveling system by controlling pumps, then it becomes dependent on the fuel level sensing system to balance, so that introduces a dependency and new ways for things to go wrong. The timed flip flop switching is simpler, doesn't require sensors.

An issue if you have a fuel imbalance. You have to override the fuel cycling and force it on one tank, but don't do that too long or you are out of balance again the other way.

On twin jets, ejector pumps are used to transfer fuel from one side to the other in case of fuel imbalance or extended engine out operation. In normal use, they are rarely used, both engines draw equally from each tank and the two sides are kept separate. Ejector pumps are light weight and never need servicing (basically just a venturi).
Attachment:
Ejector_or_Injector.png

Quote:
the engine would draw fuel only from the center tank. No switching and fairly automatic.

You basically described the MU2 fuel system. One center tank from which both engines draw, transfer from other tanks, tips by bleed air (they are round so they can take the pressure), outers by electric pump.

Mike C.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 14:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3452
Post Likes: +2396
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Dang, hadn't heard that. I assumed fuel would draw from both sides simultaneously and have a transfer pump to use when necessary. Max standard fuel imbalance in the Mustang is 200 lbs. with max demonstrated of 600 lbs. I would guess it's less in the SF50. With a fuel select valve failure, you're not going to have an abundance of time to deal with that because it's likely to be a fair amount out of balance before you catch it.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 14:33 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 11/22/12
Posts: 2595
Post Likes: +2352
Company: Retired
Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: 1993 Bonanza A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
on automatic, the thing switches tanks every two minutes.
TBM does the same thing every ten minutes, IIRC. I think it's a certification requirement that there be some system to prevent forgetting to switch tanks.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 14:41 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Dang, hadn't heard that. I assumed fuel would draw from both sides simultaneously and have a transfer pump to use when necessary.

Another example where the SF50 is vastly more complex than the SR22.

The SR22 pilot switches tank every 20-30 minutes or so in cruise by using a manual fuel valve.

If you did the same thing, a manual valve, for the SF50, you'd be 200 lbs out of balance and you'd be way out of trim. But you don't want the SF50 pilot having to switch tanks manually every few minutes. So you have to design an automatic system, which they did. But now the automatic system can fail, so you have to provide a procedure for that and monitor for the failure. Plus you have to be able to override the automatic system, so there's a procedure for that. Plus the automatic system cycles so often, you potentially cause premature wear out.

Meanwhile, the twin jet pilot is doing... nothing, even less than the SR22 pilot.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 14:44 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19252
Post Likes: +23622
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I think it's a certification requirement that there be some system to prevent forgetting to switch tanks.

I don't think there is a certification requirement (witness SR22 manual fuel valve, FAR 23 aircraft also).

I think it naturally comes about as a practical matter. You want to switch tanks often enough that roll trim is not affected, but you don't want pilots to have to do it manually on an airplane that burns several hundred pounds an hour.

Thus, you need some system to draw evenly. With fuel in low wings, you simply can't do "both", and thus the complexity starts.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 14:59 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 11/22/12
Posts: 2595
Post Likes: +2352
Company: Retired
Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: 1993 Bonanza A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
I think it's a certification requirement that there be some system to prevent forgetting to switch tanks.

I don't think there is a certification requirement (witness SR22 manual fuel valve, FAR 23 aircraft also).
Certification requirement for SE turbines. As mentioned, TBM does it the same way, Meridian and Pilatus have a different system to the same effect, I don't know about others.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 15:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 11898
Post Likes: +2854
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Another example where the SF50 is vastly more complex than the SR22.


Nah, SF50 G2 will likely go with a more common/traditional center tank fed by both wings via gravity feed using static air pressure to balance the head pressure of both tanks.

There are many ways to solve it. The above is just one solution I know works really well from the Aerostar. I am sure Cirrus will come up with their own spin, especially if they find a reliability issue with the vendor part.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 15:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/17/08
Posts: 6064
Post Likes: +12476
Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
Username Protected wrote:
Nah, SF50 G2 will likely go with a more common/traditional center tank fed by both wings via gravity feed using static air pressure to balance the head pressure of both tanks.

There are many ways to solve it. The above is just one solution I know works really well from the Aerostar. I am sure Cirrus will come up with their own spin, especially if they find a reliability issue with the vendor part.

Tim


I doubt they will slay that dragon with a gravity or pitot pressure solution. The TBM has been around for a long time with the motor driven selector system,,,,

_________________
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal
MCW
Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 16:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/23/09
Posts: 1071
Post Likes: +564
Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
Username Protected wrote:
I don't think there is a certification requirement (witness SR22 manual fuel valve, FAR 23 aircraft also).
Certification requirement for SE turbines. As mentioned, TBM does it the same way, Meridian and Pilatus have a different system to the same effect, I don't know about others.


I think it has to do with the restart time of a turbine after a tank is ran dry doesn’t meet the FAAs requirements thus it must be certified with an automatic system.

PC12 uses motive pumps that draw fuel from both tanks and keeps tanks balanced with electric pumps that provide more pressure on the heavy side. No valve involved.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 16:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5233
Post Likes: +3026
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
. I am sure Cirrus will come up with their own spin, ...


Nah, you know Cirrus does not do spins. :duck:

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 16:49 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/04/14
Posts: 1703
Post Likes: +1155
Location: Southern California
Aircraft: C 210
:rofl:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 16:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/17/08
Posts: 6064
Post Likes: +12476
Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
Username Protected wrote:
. I am sure Cirrus will come up with their own spin, ...


Nah, you know Cirrus does not do spins. :duck:


That's funny.....
_________________
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal
MCW
Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 17:39 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6357
Post Likes: +5540
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Turbo Commander 680V
If you have to have a fuel system where you need to change tanks all the time, you've designed the system wrong. Just look at what Ted Smith did and copy that.

_________________
Problem is the intelligent people are full of doubt, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2017, 20:36 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/02/09
Posts: 1340
Post Likes: +404
Company: Nantucket Rover Repair
Location: Manchester, NH (MHT)
Aircraft: Cessna N337JJ
Username Protected wrote:
If you have to have a fuel system where you need to change tanks all the time, you've designed the system wrong. Just look at what Ted Smith did and copy that.


How does the fuel system work in an Aerostar?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377 ... 512  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Marsh.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.