banner
banner

29 Mar 2024, 07:25 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Concorde Battery (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:02 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1562
Post Likes: +1781
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Username Protected wrote:
...pressurized, turbine Bonanza that ran on JetA. The SF50 is it.

I don't think that's even close....


How is it not even close?

Fits in the same hanger
Just as easy to fly
Pressurized
A/C
300 knots
Seats the same number of people
Has the same range

It couldn't be any closer unless it was actually a Bonanza that did all those things.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:06 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
Username Protected wrote:

How is it not even close?


All those things are true, but have you sat in one? It's much, much roomier; considerably larger, despite it fitting in same hangar; easier to get in/out. If you put a turbine 36 beside the SF50, it does not look like or feel like anywhere close to the same plane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13064
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
...pressurized, turbine Bonanza that ran on JetA. The SF50 is it.

I don't think that's even close....

Explain

I hate when people make comments like this but don’t elevosrate. It’s a forum. Elaborate. That’s the whole point. And I love a challenge. :D

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13064
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

How is it not even close?


All those things are true, but have you sat in one? It's much, much roomier; considerably larger, despite it fitting in same hangar; easier to get in/out. If you put a turbine 36 beside the SF50, it does not look like or feel like anywhere close to the same plane.

Oh. You think it’s better? In that case yes. I agree. But that’s not my point. My point is a generalization. Not a specific.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
Username Protected wrote:
Explain

I hate when people make comments like this but don’t elevosrate. It’s a forum. Elaborate. That’s the whole point. And I love a challenge. :D

It's in the post right above.

As admitted, you can find plenty of similarities, but the layout and feel is nowhere remotely similar.

It's often compared to the SR, and while sitting in the cockpit, it really has a lot of the same feel, except substantially more substantial. But it's not remotely similar to an SR turbine, either.

It is in it's own class.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
Username Protected wrote:
Oh. You think it’s better? In that case yes. I agree. But that’s not my point. My point is a generalization. Not a specific.

If that's how I get to exit an anticipated debate by you, I'm very content with that.

You can compare anything if you're general enough. ;)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13064
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Explain

I hate when people make comments like this but don’t elevosrate. It’s a forum. Elaborate. That’s the whole point. And I love a challenge. :D

It's in the post right above.

As admitted, you can find plenty of similarities, but the layout and feel is nowhere remotely similar.

It's often compared to the SR, and while sitting in the cockpit, it really has a lot of the same feel, except substantially more substantial. But it's not remotely similar to an SR turbine, either.

It is in it's own class.

That wasn’t my point but yes, of course the SF50 is better. I assumed we all agreed on that. It’s a brand new design. The Bonanza is not.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13064
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
...pressurized, turbine Bonanza that ran on JetA. The SF50 is it.

I don't think that's even close....

This means you don’t think the SF50 is better than a pressurized, turbine bonanza.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
Username Protected wrote:
For years BT has wanted a pressurized, turbine Bonanza that ran on JetA. The SF50 is it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
One of us is a victim of semantics. Or both.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:37 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/30/10
Posts: 4263
Post Likes: +3718
Company: Flagstaff-Williams Dev. LLC
Location: KCMR
Aircraft: 1965 310J
Username Protected wrote:
One of us is a victim of semantics. Or both.


Thats because behind every elevosrate is lurking a covefefe. :)

_________________
All my friends are here. I know this because all my enemies are dead. :)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
Username Protected wrote:
One of us is a victim of semantics. Or both.


Thats because behind every elevosrate is lurking a covefefe. :)

I caught the elevosrate, but had to google covefefe. :D

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13064
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
One of us is a victim of semantics. Or both.


Thats because behind every elevosrate is lurking a covefefe. :)

Touché

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26431
Post Likes: +13064
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
One of us is a victim of semantics. Or both.

The SF50 is it. As in “it’s what everyone has wanted for a long time”.

I don’t know why you read it as a criticism since I’ve been a big supporter of the SF50 since page 1.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2018, 15:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 11864
Post Likes: +14524
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
Username Protected wrote:

I don’t know why you read it as a criticism since I’ve been a big supporter of the SF50 since page 1.

Not a criticism! A weak comparison, which you said was a broad generalization. All good. No doubt you are a supporter. About a 1k of those +1's are mine....


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429 ... 512  Next




You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024

.camguard.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.aeroled-85x50-2022-12-06.jpg.
.aircraftassociates-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.Foreflight_85x50_color.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.aircraftferry-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Marsh.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.ei-85x150.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.one-mile-up-85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.cav-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kingairacademy-85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.pure-medical-85x150.png.
.Genesys_85x50.jpg.
.chairmanaviation-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.avionwealth-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.