25 Apr 2024, 15:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 05 Apr 2018, 22:50 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/19/10 Posts: 350 Post Likes: +156 Location: NY
Aircraft: C310R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looks like an over pressurized Foland Nat
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 05 Apr 2018, 22:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: https://www.flyingmag.com/cirrus-vision-jet-wins-collier-trophy Guess they didn't learn much from the previous light jet winner, Eclipse. I just don't think the SF50 is in the same category as the JPL Dawn Mission, or the Mars Curiosity Rover, or any of the other winners, except Eclipse. One would imagine Falcon Heavy would be a proper contender for 2018. That's what I think of as advancing aerospace, not a slow, low, tadpole of a jet. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 08:41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 11898 Post Likes: +2854 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's what I think of as advancing aerospace, not a slow, low, tadpole of a jet.
Mike C. The SF50 does not "advance" jets in the top end performance. It advances the use of turbine technology at the bottom end. From what I have read, I am pretty sure the SF50 has the lowest stall speed of any turbine, costs half or less of the next cheapest turbine, it also disrupts the SETP market. When you look at the history of the trophy, it is not always about technology, often it is about disrupting the market. And the SF50 does that in spades; at least from a perception level. Reality is still TBD. Tim
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 09:09 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/01/14 Posts: 2152 Post Likes: +1644 Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
|
|
I don’t consider the SF-50 much of a jet, or performance step up. What the SF-50 does is rid the owner of piston maintenance.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 09:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26431 Post Likes: +13066 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What the SF-50 does is rid the owner of piston maintenance. And that's Huuuuge.....
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 09:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3303 Post Likes: +1424 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What the SF-50 does is rid the owner of piston maintenance. And that's Huuuuge.....
That's no lie. I'm so sick of maintaining piston engines.
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 09:58 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What the SF-50 does is rid the owner of piston maintenance. You make it sound like the SF50 is the only turbine in the sky. Anybody who wants to be rid of piston maintenance can do that without the SF50. I've done it for 10 years. In that time, my total engine maintenance has been brief inspections, oil samples, and ONE oil change. In other words, trivial. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 10:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/04/08 Posts: 1818 Post Likes: +1404 Location: MYF, San Diego, CA
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looks like an over pressurized Foland Nat No the Folland Gnat was an attractive little thing https://www.google.com/save
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 11:01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6073 Post Likes: +12507 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
A GA company won the The Collier Trophy. That never happens.
This is a win for GA. Period. Lets celebrate it.
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 11:05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5470 Post Likes: +6188 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A GA company won the The Collier Trophy. That never happens.
This is a win for GA. Period. Lets celebrate it. I was thinking the same thing. Is this not a really big deal? No one is really talking about it.
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 11:24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 03/17/08 Posts: 6073 Post Likes: +12507 Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
|
|
And further, what a shame that American investors are so short term focused that they can't see the long term value in investing in innovative American companies.
Shortly after the Chinese bought Cirrus I ran into Dale K and and asked him how it was going. He replied with a long face, "I am getting beat up pretty hard in the Avpress about the sale to the Chinese... I didn't sell it to the Chinese, the Saudi's did." Then he got a really big smile and said, "But what a joy it is to work for an investor where the short term plan is 5 years and the long term plan is 25."
Who do we think is going to win the race? Wake up America...
BTW, investing in mutual funds based only on short term returns, makes all of us an accomplice.
_________________ Tailwinds, Doug Rozendaal MCW Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 11:30 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19252 Post Likes: +23622 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A GA company won the The Collier Trophy. That never happens. Been a number of GA winners: 2014 - Gulfstream G650 2005 - Eclipse Aviation EA500 2004 - Gulfstream G550 1996 - Cessna Citation X 1985 - Cessna for Citation safety record 1978 - Williams for small turbofans Quote: This is a win for GA. Period. Lets celebrate it. That's what many said about Eclipse, which then ended in bankruptcy a few years later. Frankly, the GA winners really don't rate in terms of progress and accomplishment compared to many of the other winners. For example, last year's winner was Blue Origin with their reusable rocket platform New Shepard. List of winners here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collier_TrophyNote the criteria: "the greatest achievement in aeronautics or astronautics in America, with respect to improving the performance, efficiency, and safety of air or space vehicles, the value of which has been thoroughly demonstrated by actual use during the preceding year." I seriously doubt the SF50 is the greatest achievement we had in aerospace in 2017. If so, that's depressing. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 11:33 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 01/11/08 Posts: 2070 Post Likes: +685 Location: Gaithersburg , MD (KGAI)
Aircraft: 1980 Baron 55
|
|
This is a huge deal and one that GA should truly celebrate.
By chance, I got my first ride in one the day before.
All I can say is for a personally flown Jet, it is vey impressive.
The wrap around windscreen allows for the best view I have ever seen in a plane I have been in.
The start procedure is brain dead easy, turn one knob and push one button, Boom!
The avionics are drop dead beautiful and easy to manage and the auto-pilot flys if flawlessly.
I got three take offs and landings between Frederick, Maryland-Lancaster. Pa. and Morristown.
It does suck some fuel down low, as any turbine would, but man what a ride.
BTW, the Cirrus rep sold one to the demo customer we went to see in Morristown.
We were riding in Serial number 41
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 06 Apr 2018, 11:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: 11/23/12 Posts: 2374 Post Likes: +2876 Company: CSRA Document Solutions Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This is a huge deal and one that GA should truly celebrate.
By chance, I got my first ride in one the day before.
All I can say is for a personally flown Jet, it is vey impressive.
The wrap around windscreen allows for the best view I have ever seen in a plane I have been in.
The start procedure is brain dead easy, turn one knob and push one button, Boom!
The avionics are drop dead beautiful and easy to manage and the auto-pilot flys if flawlessly.
I got three take offs and landings between Frederick, Maryland-Lancaster. Pa. and Morristown.
It does suck some fuel down low, as any turbine would, but man what a ride.
BTW, the Cirrus rep sold one to the demo customer we went to see in Morristown.
We were riding in Serial number 41 What no pictures? Peace, Don
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2024
|
|
|
|