banner
banner

16 Nov 2025, 07:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 2345 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 ... 157  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 13 Feb 2021, 20:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:
:lol:

Now turn around and go back.

~200 knots groundspeed!

What plane, altitude? An Eagle II at FL410?

Mike C.


This was actually the return. Outbound was 430 so a weaker headwind. About 250gs.
Eagle II descending out of 410. Don't remember the exact altitude.
I'm learning that westbound 430 is generally best for winds and obviously efficiency. Eastbound it's 410 and occasionally 390 if winds favor it.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 04:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/15/21
Posts: 3124
Post Likes: +1650
Username Protected wrote:

This was actually the return. Outbound was 430 so a weaker headwind. About 250gs.
Eagle II descending out of 410. Don't remember the exact altitude.
I'm learning that westbound 430 is generally best for winds and obviously efficiency. Eastbound it's 410 and occasionally 390 if winds favor it.

Very nice, Israel. Looks like at least some of the tape gauges have been replaced with dials.

What would be your advice for someone who is looking to buy a 501 for low yearly utilization? Is the FJ-44 conversion that much better considering the higher capex, or would a Pratt model be adequate? Obviously it's highly subjective, but I'm looking for as much info as I can get. Thanks.

_________________
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 10:26 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:

This was actually the return. Outbound was 430 so a weaker headwind. About 250gs.
Eagle II descending out of 410. Don't remember the exact altitude.
I'm learning that westbound 430 is generally best for winds and obviously efficiency. Eastbound it's 410 and occasionally 390 if winds favor it.

Very nice, Israel. Looks like at least some of the tape gauges have been replaced with dials.

What would be your advice for someone who is looking to buy a 501 for low yearly utilization? Is the FJ-44 conversion that much better considering the higher capex, or would a Pratt model be adequate? Obviously it's highly subjective, but I'm looking for as much info as I can get. Thanks.


As part of the conversion, all tape gauges were swapped out for dials except for fuel on board which I believe needs to stay.
Regarding advice, I closed in December so still learning the airplane. But with Williams you generally want to be on the program and they have a minimum of 150 hours per year. So if you’re not going to fly at least 150 hours a year you’re still going to pay them about $330 x150. I’ve never flown a Pratt but the Eagle climb cruise and range performance is phenomenal. Hot n high is improved as well. If your missions are under 1000nm I’d imagine a Pratt will do. If fuel prices keep climbing though..... :ohno:

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 10:27 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20747
Post Likes: +26215
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What would be your advice for someone who is looking to buy a 501 for low yearly utilization? Is the FJ-44 conversion that much better considering the higher capex, or would a Pratt model be adequate?

The Williams engine program, which is basically required if you own an FJ44, has a minimum hours per year of 150. If you fly less, you will pay for 150 hours. This is not good for a low utilization operator. Program prices are about $350/hour for a set of two FJ44. FJ44 provides higher climb, faster climb, faster speed, lower fuel burn, and more range.

The Pratt engine is usually not on a program. HSI is every 1750 hours, OH every 3500 hours, but only HSI is required. There seems to be plenty of available used engines in various states. Textron does (usually) offer a low utilization maintenance program (LUMP) which can extend the main inspections by a factor of two (phase 5 every 6 years, for example). This is a great benefit to the low utilization operator. Textron indicated to me they would not extend an FJ44 converted airplane, however, so this is limited to the stock airplanes.

If your range and speed requirements fit with a stock 501SP, then it is probably the best fit for a low utilization operator. It will be about a 1000 nm plane, mid to high 30s, 350 knots.

If you can operate at or near 150 hours/year, then I'd look at the Stallion conversion, FJ44-2A. This will be a 1400 nm plane, FL430, 380-390 knots. You will need to pay the Williams mafia, but then your engine is taken care of, mostly. I don't think the Eagle II (FJ44-2A with added fuel humps) is very good, the humps hurt top speed and seem to usually be done poorly.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 11:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:
What would be your advice for someone who is looking to buy a 501 for low yearly utilization? Is the FJ-44 conversion that much better considering the higher capex, or would a Pratt model be adequate?

The Williams engine program, which is basically required if you own an FJ44, has a minimum hours per year of 150. If you fly less, you will pay for 150 hours. This is not good for a low utilization operator. Program prices are about $350/hour for a set of two FJ44. FJ44 provides higher climb, faster climb, faster speed, lower fuel burn, and more range.


The Pratt engine is usually not on a program. HSI is every 1750 hours, OH every 3500 hours, but only HSI is required. There seems to be plenty of available used engines in various states. Textron does (usually) offer a low utilization maintenance program (LUMP) which can extend the main inspections by a factor of two (phase 5 every 6 years, for example). This is a great benefit to the low utilization operator. Textron indicated to me they would not extend an FJ44 converted airplane, however, so this is limited to the stock airplanes.

If your range and speed requirements fit with a stock 501SP, then it is probably the best fit for a low utilization operator. It will be about a 1000 nm plane, mid to high 30s, 350 knots.

If you can operate at or near 150 hours/year, then I'd look at the Stallion conversion, FJ44-2A. This will be a 1400 nm plane, FL430, 380-390 knots. You will need to pay the Williams mafia, but then your engine is taken care of, mostly. I don't think the Eagle II (FJ44-2A with added fuel humps) is very good, the humps hurt top speed and seem to usually be done poorly.

Mike C.


Tap blue which is the highest level of coverage is currently 330 an hour.

And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

The stallion at altitude from what I’ve investigated is 375-380 and real world range with 800lb reserves is 1250nm. The eagle is 15kts slower but due to the additional fuel, range is 1500+ nm. I may have a rare eagle II that wasn’t done poorly but I’m very happy so far.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 14:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/15/21
Posts: 3124
Post Likes: +1650
Username Protected wrote:

Tap blue which is the highest level of coverage is currently 330 an hour.

And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

The stallion at altitude from what I’ve investigated is 375-380 and real world range with 800lb reserves is 1250nm. The eagle is 15kts slower but due to the additional fuel, range is 1500+ nm. I may have a rare eagle II that wasn’t done poorly but I’m very happy so far.

Thank you, Israel and Mike.

I've been looking for a 501 AFM online (either for stock or FJ44 conversion) to have a hard look at the performance numbers at different altitudes/weights, takeoff distances, etc. but can't find anything.

Do either of you know where I could get a 501 AFM, in particular the performance section? Many thanks.

_________________
Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, Administrate, Litigate.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 15:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:

Tap blue which is the highest level of coverage is currently 330 an hour.

And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

The stallion at altitude from what I’ve investigated is 375-380 and real world range with 800lb reserves is 1250nm. The eagle is 15kts slower but due to the additional fuel, range is 1500+ nm. I may have a rare eagle II that wasn’t done poorly but I’m very happy so far.

Thank you, Israel and Mike.

I've been looking for a 501 AFM online (either for stock or FJ44 conversion) to have a hard look at the performance numbers at different altitudes/weights, takeoff distances, etc. but can't find anything.

Do either of you know where I could get a 501 AFM, in particular the performance section? Many thanks.


I have the eagle II afm differences in digital format I believe. Not the stock.
Send me your email and I will send it.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 16:51 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20747
Post Likes: +26215
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I have the eagle II afm differences in digital format I believe. Not the stock.
Send me your email and I will send it.

I'd like a copy of the Eagle II documents, mikec (at) ciholas.com.

I may be able to dig up 500/501 AFM and POM.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 16:56 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20747
Post Likes: +26215
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

Price is $20K initial plus $1500/year "research fee". Bacon has monetized his program offerings to get yearly revenue from them. I don't think the yearly fee does anything than cost owners money.

Lots of downside to the program, it is 91.409(f)(4), which requires FSDO approval. Also, often causes airplane to be out of inspection on sale to the next buyer since it can't be transferred. The Textron program is vastly cheaper, one time fee, and is a factory program under 91.409(f)(3), so no FSDO approval, so easy to get and use. I think it can be transferred, but even if it can't I got mine in a few days.

You can always ask Textron if they would do a LUMP for an FJ44 conversion. They sort of said no to me, but that may be something that changes over time. They used to refuse to service them at the service centers, but that changed, so there's hope.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 17:55 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20747
Post Likes: +26215
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Do either of you know where I could get a 501 AFM, in particular the performance section?

I think you will find the performance section of the AFM to be disappointing. It deals with mainly runway data, not flight planning data.

You want the Operating Manual.

Send your email to mikec (at) ciholas.com and I can make them available to you.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 20:34 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:

Tap blue which is the highest level of coverage is currently 330 an hour.

And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

The stallion at altitude from what I’ve investigated is 375-380 and real world range with 800lb reserves is 1250nm. The eagle is 15kts slower but due to the additional fuel, range is 1500+ nm. I may have a rare eagle II that wasn’t done poorly but I’m very happy so far.

Thank you, Israel and Mike.

I've been looking for a 501 AFM online (either for stock or FJ44 conversion) to have a hard look at the performance numbers at different altitudes/weights, takeoff distances, etc. but can't find anything.

Do either of you know where I could get a 501 AFM, in particular the performance section? Many thanks.


Sent

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 20:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:
I have the eagle II afm differences in digital format I believe. Not the stock.
Send me your email and I will send it.

I'd like a copy of the Eagle II documents, mikec (at) ciholas.com.

I may be able to dig up 500/501 AFM and POM.

Mike C.


Sent

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 20:51 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/24/18
Posts: 736
Post Likes: +359
Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
Username Protected wrote:
And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

Price is $20K initial plus $1500/year "research fee". Bacon has monetized his program offerings to get yearly revenue from them. I don't think the yearly fee does anything than cost owners money.

Lots of downside to the program, it is 91.409(f)(4), which requires FSDO approval. Also, often causes airplane to be out of inspection on sale to the next buyer since it can't be transferred. The Textron program is vastly cheaper, one time fee, and is a factory program under 91.409(f)(3), so no FSDO approval, so easy to get and use. I think it can be transferred, but even if it can't I got mine in a few days.

You can always ask Textron if they would do a LUMP for an FJ44 conversion. They sort of said no to me, but that may be something that changes over time. They used to refuse to service them at the service centers, but that changed, so there's hope.

Mike C.


Yeah, at 29k in fees over 6 years I'd rather do the manufacturer mx schedule where I’m at least getting actual value. An often overlooked detail is that less inspections/Mx now generally means more catch-up Mx later.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 22:00 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/02/12
Posts: 386
Post Likes: +118
Username Protected wrote:
And low utilization programs are available for the stallion/eagle from bacon etc.

Price is $20K initial plus $1500/year "research fee". Bacon has monetized his program offerings to get yearly revenue from them. I don't think the yearly fee does anything than cost owners money.

Lots of downside to the program, it is 91.409(f)(4), which requires FSDO approval. Also, often causes airplane to be out of inspection on sale to the next buyer since it can't be transferred. The Textron program is vastly cheaper, one time fee, and is a factory program under 91.409(f)(3), so no FSDO approval, so easy to get and use. I think it can be transferred, but even if it can't I got mine in a few days.

You can always ask Textron if they would do a LUMP for an FJ44 conversion. They sort of said no to me, but that may be something that changes over time. They used to refuse to service them at the service centers, but that changed, so there's hope.

Mike C.



Mike,

What is the Textron/Cessna low utilization program or what are the benefits? Also, do you know the cost?

Thanks,
Steve

Top

 Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp
PostPosted: 23 Feb 2021, 22:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5304
Post Likes: +5294
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
KPurcell@txtav.com . Email Kim. Extends 1-4 out to 3 years and 5 out to 6. Costs $6k. No A or B inspections.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 2345 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 ... 157  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Latitude.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.