04 Nov 2025, 23:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 02 Jan 2021, 16:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/09/09 Posts: 4267 Post Likes: +901
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Cirrus is a remarkable airplane and I understand why people buy them. For me personally, I just don't think I'd ever buy one... for me, it's a "seen one, seen them all" plane... flown one, flown them all... I walk right past on the ramp and don't think twice about it. Doesn't tug my heart strings in the slightest.. I don't have a practical use for one and for a go-to-work plane it's probably a good choice. My friend just bought a brand new one, and I'm scratching my head because he could have got a darned nice used turboprop for that much scratch. Old apples to oranges comparison. (I would have got the TP as well)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/18/09 Posts: 532 Post Likes: +220 Company: Oklahoma Otolaryngology assoc. Location: KOUN, Norman, OK
Aircraft: A36, AT-6 Texan
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was able to do the demo flight this summer with my brother in law who has since placed an order for a new G6. Compared to my ‘99 A36 with A/C I would say the biggest factor just seemed to be less fatigue. We flew for over almost 2 hours and it was 100 deg and it was just smoother , quieter, and at full gross weight took the bumps well. I think a big factor was better A/C design and solar windows but I was impressed. That's quite an endorsement Jeremy. I've never flown in an A36 with A/C and just assumed it would be a similar experience. What are the differences that you feel make the A/C system better in the 22 vs. the A36? Cabin size? Windows? A/C unit itself? Airflow?
My A/C blows cold but only covers the pilot and copilot it’s the factory system at that time. The backseat of my plane is hot bc you also need to keep the fresh air vents closed to have a prayer at 100 degrees. The cirrus has all seats covered with A/C vents. So I would say airflow and the windows were impressive as to how much heat transfer they cut down on.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3308 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Newer 36’s with FTA system puts AC all vents front and back. Very good system now factory installed on Beech 36 & 58. Excellent. Very glad to hear they fixed that.
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/08/11 Posts: 485 Post Likes: +244 Location: KHPN
Aircraft: DA40
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My friend just bought a brand new one, and I'm scratching my head because he could have got a darned nice used turboprop for that much scratch. This! I ask myself the same question every time I hear someone bought a new one. There must be a dozen nearly new SR’s on the Million Air ramp at HPN, plus more in the hangars. Kudos to Cirrus for brilliant marketing, but I don’t feel the buzz.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 02 Jan 2021, 22:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/02/19 Posts: 39 Post Likes: +22 Location: Chicagoland
Aircraft: Browsing
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But I’ll never forgive them for taking away my little blue lever. Why did they do that? I always felt that it was more difficult to achieve the power I wanted. Also the thing ate oil like a twin! I don't understand the blue lever comment at all. What could be more simple than setting power with a big % power gauge on the MFD? It runs at 2500RPM all the time and you put the big lever to the % power you want. What's so confusing about that? Don't understand the oil usage comment either. I've owned a G3 SR22T and a G5 SR22T over the past 5-6 years. On both airplanes, I use (1) quart between oil changes. It's a big block Conti, same as the A36. There's nothing dramatically different about the engine. Like any big block Conti, especially one that's turbo-normalized, the cylinders rarely make it to O/H. I would expect that in any SR22T that you're going to replace 3-6 of the cylinders sometime in the 800-1,200 hour mark. Budget it and simply do it when they come up. They're roughly $2K / jug installed.
I don’t have a ton of hours in it, but I feel that I end up fighting the embedded blue lever / gates trying to get the right power. It could be that specific plane, as it’s a rental and who knows how much abuse it gets. I find 2500rpm at the correct MP extremely elusive. I’m usually too low on MP. WRT oil, on my last big trip I consumed 4 or 5 quarts in 14 hours Hobbs, which seems high, but again it’s the only 550 I fly.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 02 Jan 2021, 23:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/23/18 Posts: 131 Post Likes: +31
|
|
|
I looked at the SR22t G6.. it is an elegant and ergonomic airplane, that cannot be denied... and then I looked at the cost and and what else can I buy for that money....
I chose a P210N silver eagle.. basically the same price (used) for both planes, both setup with state of the art electronics and the silver eagle has a turbine, 5 blade prop, and pressurized and will run circles around the sr22t in every phase of flight...
As for the parachute... I’d rather tilt the odds by paying for an engine that is far less likely to fail...aka turbine...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 03 Jan 2021, 00:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/23/18 Posts: 131 Post Likes: +31
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.
And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22? A silver eagle operates at not so different numbers... you would be surprised
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 03 Jan 2021, 00:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/28/15 Posts: 67 Post Likes: +41
Aircraft: C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I looked at the SR22t G6.. it is an elegant and ergonomic airplane, that cannot be denied... and then I looked at the cost and and what else can I buy for that money....
I chose a P210N silver eagle.. basically the same price (used) for both planes, both setup with state of the art electronics and the silver eagle has a turbine, 5 blade prop, and pressurized and will run circles around the sr22t in every phase of flight...
As for the parachute... I’d rather tilt the odds by paying for an engine that is far less likely to fail...aka turbine... How much fuel do those hold and what is the range? Seems like a cool concept but I wonder about how much Jet A you can pack into tanks originally designed to feed a thriftier piston powerplant.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 03 Jan 2021, 01:13 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14423 Post Likes: +9555 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.
And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22? You could get a Meridian, a jet prop, a silver eagle, a tbm700, mu2, 501sp, F90, turbo commander, some of them with a few hundred grand to over half mil left over. The operating cost will be more of course but not so much more that it would be out of reach of a guy who can drop a million on an airplane. It’s gotta be the tax advantage of new.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 03 Jan 2021, 01:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/23/18 Posts: 131 Post Likes: +31
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I looked at the SR22t G6.. it is an elegant and ergonomic airplane, that cannot be denied... and then I looked at the cost and and what else can I buy for that money....
I chose a P210N silver eagle.. basically the same price (used) for both planes, both setup with state of the art electronics and the silver eagle has a turbine, 5 blade prop, and pressurized and will run circles around the sr22t in every phase of flight...
As for the parachute... I’d rather tilt the odds by paying for an engine that is far less likely to fail...aka turbine... How much fuel do those hold and what is the range? Seems like a cool concept but I wonder about how much Jet A you can pack into tanks originally designed to feed a thriftier piston powerplant.
Main tanks 90 gallons (3hrs plus reserve) Tip tanks 16.25 each (32.5 total) +1 hr Baggage tank 26.8 + 1hr
Flight plan for 25gph at 200-215 KTAS
Sweet spot for engine and psi is 16-20,000’ (8-10k cabin altitude)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware... Posted: 03 Jan 2021, 01:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/08/11 Posts: 485 Post Likes: +244 Location: KHPN
Aircraft: DA40
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.
And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22? Agreed. Apples and oranges comparison. Wrong metric. Cost per *mile* counts in a traveling machine. Still more in the turbine, but less severe than per hour. But, oh the differences. Pressurized in the flight levels with turbine quiet and smoothness vs. cannula or mask in the teens with piston noise and vibration. You get what you pay for. Sometimes.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|