banner
banner

04 Nov 2025, 23:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 16:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/09/09
Posts: 4267
Post Likes: +901
Username Protected wrote:
The Cirrus is a remarkable airplane and I understand why people buy them. For me personally, I just don't think I'd ever buy one... for me, it's a "seen one, seen them all" plane... flown one, flown them all... I walk right past on the ramp and don't think twice about it. Doesn't tug my heart strings in the slightest.. I don't have a practical use for one and for a go-to-work plane it's probably a good choice. My friend just bought a brand new one, and I'm scratching my head because he could have got a darned nice used turboprop for that much scratch.


Old apples to oranges comparison.

(I would have got the TP as well)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/18/09
Posts: 532
Post Likes: +220
Company: Oklahoma Otolaryngology assoc.
Location: KOUN, Norman, OK
Aircraft: A36, AT-6 Texan
Username Protected wrote:
I was able to do the demo flight this summer with my brother in law who has since placed an order for a new G6. Compared to my ‘99 A36 with A/C I would say the biggest factor just seemed to be less fatigue. We flew for over almost 2 hours and it was 100 deg and it was just smoother , quieter, and at full gross weight took the bumps well. I think a big factor was better A/C design and solar windows but I was impressed.


That's quite an endorsement Jeremy. I've never flown in an A36 with A/C and just assumed it would be a similar experience. What are the differences that you feel make the A/C system better in the 22 vs. the A36? Cabin size? Windows? A/C unit itself? Airflow?


My A/C blows cold but only covers the pilot and copilot it’s the factory system at that time. The backseat of my plane is hot bc you also need to keep the fresh air vents closed to have a prayer at 100 degrees. The cirrus has all seats covered with A/C vents. So I would say airflow and the windows were impressive as to how much heat transfer they cut down on.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:23 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
I can’t imagine why Beech wouldn’t run a/c lines to the back of the airplane as well. That’s disappointing.

The cooling system in the SR is definitely one of the systems they got right. There are a total of 6 air outlets and when you have the system on recirc mode, it REALLY blows cool air hard. It’s not quite automotive airflow but it’s darned close. Certainly way more airflow than what I was used to in GA. With later models, they also made changes to the system so that you are permitted to run it during all phases of operation. The C340 I flew for awhile had many limitations for when the system could be operated and I cooked in that airplane many times.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/20/12
Posts: 642
Post Likes: +119
Company: Lee Oil Co. / Commercial Bank
Location: K3A2 & KGKT
Aircraft: Baron 58 N158YB
Newer 36’s with FTA system puts AC all vents front and back. Very good system now factory installed on Beech 36 & 58.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:50 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
Newer 36’s with FTA system puts AC all vents front and back. Very good system now factory installed on Beech 36 & 58.


Excellent. Very glad to hear they fixed that.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 17:56 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/08/11
Posts: 485
Post Likes: +244
Location: KHPN
Aircraft: DA40
Username Protected wrote:
My friend just bought a brand new one, and I'm scratching my head because he could have got a darned nice used turboprop for that much scratch.
This!

I ask myself the same question every time I hear someone bought a new one. There must be a dozen nearly new SR’s on the Million Air ramp at HPN, plus more in the hangars. Kudos to Cirrus for brilliant marketing, but I don’t feel the buzz.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 18:06 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
A million $ SE piston makes no financial sense to me as well. However, what I believe many SR owners are doing is constantly flipping to the newer birds to take advantage of additional depreciation. If your opex remains roughly the same and you flip to a bird with $300k more book value, you get to depreciate that added $300k which wipes out your added cost of capital and insurance. Basically, you get to upgrade to brand new for not much more out of pocket costs.

These guys must also believe that they will fly until the day they die or perhaps they don’t understand recapture.

As for me, I despise actual depreciation so I’m just fine and dandy owning an asset with little actual depreciation. I lost less than $10k when I sold my G3 and if I sold my G5 today, I’d also have very little depreciation. New birds depreciate much faster, no matter what the sales guy says...

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 22:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/02/19
Posts: 39
Post Likes: +22
Location: Chicagoland
Aircraft: Browsing
Username Protected wrote:
But I’ll never forgive them for taking away my little blue lever. Why did they do that? I always felt that it was more difficult to achieve the power I wanted. Also the thing ate oil like a twin!


I don't understand the blue lever comment at all. What could be more simple than setting power with a big % power gauge on the MFD? It runs at 2500RPM all the time and you put the big lever to the % power you want. What's so confusing about that?

Don't understand the oil usage comment either. I've owned a G3 SR22T and a G5 SR22T over the past 5-6 years. On both airplanes, I use (1) quart between oil changes. It's a big block Conti, same as the A36. There's nothing dramatically different about the engine. Like any big block Conti, especially one that's turbo-normalized, the cylinders rarely make it to O/H. I would expect that in any SR22T that you're going to replace 3-6 of the cylinders sometime in the 800-1,200 hour mark. Budget it and simply do it when they come up. They're roughly $2K / jug installed.


I don’t have a ton of hours in it, but I feel that I end up fighting the embedded blue lever / gates trying to get the right power. It could be that specific plane, as it’s a rental and who knows how much abuse it gets. I find 2500rpm at the correct MP extremely elusive. I’m usually too low on MP. WRT oil, on my last big trip I consumed 4 or 5 quarts in 14 hours Hobbs, which seems high, but again it’s the only 550 I fly.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2021, 23:22 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/23/18
Posts: 131
Post Likes: +31
I looked at the SR22t G6.. it is an elegant and ergonomic airplane, that cannot be denied... and then I looked at the cost and and what else can I buy for that money....

I chose a P210N silver eagle.. basically the same price (used) for both planes, both setup with state of the art electronics and the silver eagle has a turbine, 5 blade prop, and pressurized and will run circles around the sr22t in every phase of flight...

As for the parachute... I’d rather tilt the odds by paying for an engine that is far less likely to fail...aka turbine...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2021, 00:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/23/13
Posts: 9389
Post Likes: +7079
Company: Kokotele Guitar Works
Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.

And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2021, 00:21 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/23/18
Posts: 131
Post Likes: +31
Username Protected wrote:
I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.

And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22?



A silver eagle operates at not so different numbers... you would be surprised


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2021, 00:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/28/15
Posts: 67
Post Likes: +41
Aircraft: C510
Username Protected wrote:
I looked at the SR22t G6.. it is an elegant and ergonomic airplane, that cannot be denied... and then I looked at the cost and and what else can I buy for that money....

I chose a P210N silver eagle.. basically the same price (used) for both planes, both setup with state of the art electronics and the silver eagle has a turbine, 5 blade prop, and pressurized and will run circles around the sr22t in every phase of flight...

As for the parachute... I’d rather tilt the odds by paying for an engine that is far less likely to fail...aka turbine...


How much fuel do those hold and what is the range? Seems like a cool concept but I wonder about how much Jet A you can pack into tanks originally designed to feed a thriftier piston powerplant.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2021, 01:13 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.

And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22?


You could get a Meridian, a jet prop, a silver eagle, a tbm700, mu2, 501sp, F90, turbo commander, some of them with a few hundred grand to over half mil left over. The operating cost will be more of course but not so much more that it would be out of reach of a guy who can drop a million on an airplane. It’s gotta be the tax advantage of new.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2021, 01:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/23/18
Posts: 131
Post Likes: +31
Username Protected wrote:
I looked at the SR22t G6.. it is an elegant and ergonomic airplane, that cannot be denied... and then I looked at the cost and and what else can I buy for that money....

I chose a P210N silver eagle.. basically the same price (used) for both planes, both setup with state of the art electronics and the silver eagle has a turbine, 5 blade prop, and pressurized and will run circles around the sr22t in every phase of flight...

As for the parachute... I’d rather tilt the odds by paying for an engine that is far less likely to fail...aka turbine...


How much fuel do those hold and what is the range? Seems like a cool concept but I wonder about how much Jet A you can pack into tanks originally designed to feed a thriftier piston powerplant.


Main tanks 90 gallons (3hrs plus reserve)
Tip tanks 16.25 each (32.5 total) +1 hr
Baggage tank 26.8 + 1hr

Flight plan for 25gph at 200-215 KTAS

Sweet spot for engine and psi is 16-20,000’ (8-10k cabin altitude)

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus bashers beware...
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2021, 01:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/08/11
Posts: 485
Post Likes: +244
Location: KHPN
Aircraft: DA40
Username Protected wrote:
I doubt the buyer in the market for a new SR22 is the same buyer in the market for a <$1MM turboprop.

And what turboprop can be operated for anything like the hourly cost of a new SR22?
Agreed. Apples and oranges comparison.

Wrong metric. Cost per *mile* counts in a traveling machine. Still more in the turbine, but less severe than per hour. But, oh the differences. Pressurized in the flight levels with turbine quiet and smoothness vs. cannula or mask in the teens with piston noise and vibration.

You get what you pay for. Sometimes.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 141 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.