01 May 2025, 11:03 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 10:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
After training in a sim, the checkride is the easiest flight you'll ever take. The scenarios they throw at you in a sim are impossible to replicate in a real airplane.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 10:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2335 Post Likes: +2505 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You probably could get typed in 3 hours in the air I think. It's a very easy airplane to fly. The academic work is much more involved the flying part. I haven't flown steam gauge instruments or VOR approaches in years so I think I would have benefited from a little old school instrument training before doing this. It's definitely harder than flying a glass paneled machine with unlimited situational awareness. 3 hours for a type? Monkey see monkey do perhaps. This whole thread is indicative of a cavalier attitude that is minimizing both training and maintenance. I really could care less - it's not my bacon - I provide feedback to try to help Michael, but it seems like it is not resonating or appreciated. Good Luck.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 10:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19922 Post Likes: +25000 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This whole thread is indicative of a cavalier attitude BT contains plenty of windmills for an aspiring Don Quixote to tilt at if that's the target. I don't think he said it took him 3 hours, he only said it felt like it could have been done in 3 hours. He did pass a check ride, so are you condemning his instructor and/or DPE, or just him specifically? I personally have never felt training time was a good measure of capability. Indeed, I think you will find they are anti correlated. For example, I just met a Citation instructor who had a student now 40 hours flying time into a type rating course. I'm thinking I'd rather be flying with the 3 hour guy. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 12 Dec 2017, 22:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/05/12 Posts: 687 Post Likes: +503 Location: Vero Beach, FL
Aircraft: C310R, E55P, H130T2
|
|
What happened to the Grumman Albatross?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 13 Dec 2017, 00:37 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5142
|
|
Username Protected wrote: No matter what anyone thinks of my maintenance or training, it is going to be much safer than flying my Lancair around cross country as I've done and survived for the last 250 hours since parting with my last jet. I'm not stupid or cheap or a crappy pilot, I'm pretty sure I'll be fine.
250hours in 18months of ownership and down for 6 months getting a panel/ac? you may want to notify the lancair group of this new record as you've beat Bill Harrelson, the guy who flew around the world several times for hobbs vs calendar time
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 13 Dec 2017, 02:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/27/10 Posts: 10790 Post Likes: +6890 Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: New floorboards and fitting Baron cowlings to it  Love it!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Citation 501sp Posted: 13 Dec 2017, 11:20 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 2714 Post Likes: +1348 Location: Little Rock, Ar
Aircraft: A36 C560 C551 C560XL
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This has been a horrible thread drift. Many think that if you didn't spend 14 days at Flight Safety and $19,000 and drop your plane off for blank check Citation Service Center maintenance, you must be a reckless maniac. Not true.
A turbine powered aircraft is incredibly safe and reliable. The Citation series is very easy to fly. There is no better time than right now to own a legacy Citation so I'm going to capitalize on this time.
No matter what anyone thinks of my maintenance or training, it is going to be much safer than flying my Lancair around cross country as I've done and survived for the last 250 hours since parting with my last jet. I'm not stupid or cheap or a crappy pilot, I'm pretty sure I'll be fine.
Flying is about balance; safest thing to to do is to stay in bed all day. I flew my ultralight seaplane the other day at night; probably not for most people. I accepted the very mild risk of engine failure (Rotax 914 military runs them 8,000 hours and I think its a sewing machine) and enjoyed the experience; my decision and I accepted the responsibility if something bad happened. Judge as you may but that's the beauty of being pilot in command, make your decisions and enjoy your ride. I didn't take my wife on this trip because she wouldn't have enjoyed it.
This is a 40 year old vintage jet that I'm going to use for my travel needs 50 hours a year. I'm also going to enjoy fixing it hands on. I don't want or need a newer aircraft for the little I'm going to use it so this suits me perfectly.
This is a life experience I'm going to enjoy. Judging and being nasty isn't going to enhance this experience. Nothing could be more sterile than buying a new plane and dropping it off a the service center. This is going to be unique, raw and definitely un-sterile aircraft experience but equally safe and reliable as a new machine. I agree. It's perfectly doable. Keep us posted. Robert
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|