25 May 2025, 23:57 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 15:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/07/21 Posts: 405 Post Likes: +391
Aircraft: M20J/R, Sr22, SR20
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’ll propose a comparison to get this going :
Buyer has $1.5-1.7m to spend. Needs to move 4 people (let’s assume 200 lbs each) to various cities several times per week - let’s say every Tuesday and Thursday. Longest leg is Atlanta - Houston / Atlanta - Boston and will be done 1 time per month. The other flights will all be between 200-400 miles. They are risk adverse, but financially very sound and can absorb the “cost of doing business”. They would prefer these trips to be day trips to maximize their time. Otherwise they would just keep doing these trips via airlines over 3 days.
Tell me which airplane is the best for this mission. Show your work to include the cost of capital, ALL Maintenace reserves (you must account for engines…) and fuel at $5/gallon - because that’s what it is here in Atlanta. Yay! Back to a fun exercise. What is the annual budget? You can buy lots of old wide body jets for $1.5 to $1.7M. Or, why don't we take the ambiguity out of it and call it 200 (out and back twice per week, 50 weeks per year) 300NM trips and 24 (out and back once per month) 750NM trips, and we post our annual costs for our respective planes, not including capital costs or property taxes (as some don't have that cost), just has to be in the $1.5-1.7M purchase price range. I'll start it off at the bottom of the spectrum with a lowly Meridian. It'll do it, likely with a fuel stop, on at least half of the 750NM trips. My annual cost for such a mission (including insurance, pilot training, maintenance, engine reserves, subscriptions and hangar, but not including capital or property taxes) would be about 375 hours of flight time and about $175,000 to $195,000 depending on maintenance squawks. Insurance - $15,000 Hangar - $10,000 Training - $3,000 Subscriptions - $2,000 Fuel - $75,000 Engine Reserves - $40,000 Maintenance - $30,000-$50,000 Who's next?
Ok, so here's my rub to it. I need to go 1000 miles at least 2X a month, then most other trips 400RT miles 2X a month then local.
I've talked to a bunch of folks on here, seems the SETP works well for a lot of what we want, BUT, we will and want to fly a lot of trips later in the day into the evening. I know the SETP stats and reliability, however, the other half is not crazy in a SE at night over terrain. I don't want a piston, needs to be pressurized, and don't want a KA90. Seems they won't do what we need. The 90 is slow, doesn't have the legs, but they have 2 engines.
BTW, I can show the other half all the stats about SETP's, but she loved the SR22 for the chute and felt super comfy at night over nothing land. I know, I know....but can't change her mind.
We looked at PBarons, but I don't want a piston. Meridians don't have the legs, but still an option, but then won't do the late flights we like to do. The 900+ series TBM more expensive the our budget right now, though we could do a SLS600, late model. But again, she's not crazy about SE.
Oh the world problems we have to figure out.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 15:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/18/16 Posts: 90 Post Likes: +84
Aircraft: King Air C90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It’s $408.04/hrs per plane How is it you are doing so much better than the CJP posters? CJ4 owner reported $492/hr. CJ2 owner reported $466/hr. What makes you special? Mike C.
I’m no more special that the next guy. Just trying to bring some facts to the thread. I can only speak to what we have to pay on our airplanes. To insinuate the entire fleet is now at $500/hr isn’t the whole, unbiased, truth.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 15:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/18/16 Posts: 90 Post Likes: +84
Aircraft: King Air C90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’ll propose a comparison to get this going :
Buyer has $1.5-1.7m to spend. Needs to move 4 people (let’s assume 200 lbs each) to various cities several times per week - let’s say every Tuesday and Thursday. Longest leg is Atlanta - Houston / Atlanta - Boston and will be done 1 time per month. The other flights will all be between 200-400 miles. They are risk adverse, but financially very sound and can absorb the “cost of doing business”. They would prefer these trips to be day trips to maximize their time. Otherwise they would just keep doing these trips via airlines over 3 days.
Tell me which airplane is the best for this mission. Show your work to include the cost of capital, ALL Maintenace reserves (you must account for engines…) and fuel at $5/gallon - because that’s what it is here in Atlanta. Yay! Back to a fun exercise. What is the annual budget? You can buy lots of old wide body jets for $1.5 to $1.7M. Or, why don't we take the ambiguity out of it and call it 200 (out and back twice per week, 50 weeks per year) 300NM trips and 24 (out and back once per month) 750NM trips, and we post our annual costs for our respective planes, not including capital costs or property taxes (as some don't have that cost), just has to be in the $1.5-1.7M purchase price range. I'll start it off at the bottom of the spectrum with a lowly Meridian. It'll do it, likely with a fuel stop, on at least half of the 750NM trips. My annual cost for such a mission (including insurance, pilot training, maintenance, engine reserves, subscriptions and hangar, but not including capital or property taxes) would be about 375 hours of flight time and about $175,000 to $195,000 depending on maintenance squawks. Insurance - $15,000 Hangar - $10,000 Training - $3,000 Subscriptions - $2,000 Fuel - $75,000 Engine Reserves - $40,000 Maintenance - $30,000-$50,000 Who's next? Shall we put an age cap on the airframe? When I was buying 20 years old was the oldest I was willing to consider.
Good stuff Carl. Love it!
Let’s add some assumptions to help narrow the field of potential airplanes a bit :
1. Client wants nonstop flights all the time. Time is important and one of the major drivers in the decision to purchase their own airplane. The desire to save time and thereby increase productivity for the company.
2. No annual budget limitations - yet. Ultimately the annual budget will play a large role in the airplane purchased and the client is looking for the best annual budget to accomplish the mission.
3. Yes - I agree let’s cap the age. 1990 and newer airplanes only.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 16:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 9698 Post Likes: +4529 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Let’s add some assumptions to help narrow the field of potential airplanes a bit :
1. Client wants nonstop flights all the time. Time is important and one of the major drivers in the decision to purchase their own airplane. The desire to save time and thereby increase productivity for the company.
2. No annual budget limitations - yet. Ultimately the annual budget will play a large role in the airplane purchased and the client is looking for the best annual budget to accomplish the mission.
3. Yes - I agree let’s cap the age. 1990 and newer airplanes only. Destination and based runway lengths are a big part of this. Citation 501/550/560 or CJ1 series would fit the purchase budget but wouldn't work for shorter runways. For shorter runways it is hard to beat a TBM700C2/850, it has the range
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 16:11 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7949 Post Likes: +10296 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
I know the back and forth between Mike and I gets old, trust me when I say it does for me as well. I assure you that anyone who knows me personally or has picked up the phone and called me for advice, knows I’m not the jerk I sometimes appear to be on BT. I admit that Mike does bring out the worst in me and I should do better with not letting him get to me. On the other hand, he has questioned my integrity, my character, insinuated I take bribes from maintenance facilities and accused me of wasting my client’s money. All I’ve ever done is correct his inaccurate representations and point out that he’s a great researcher with limited real world experience. When Mike first joined BT, I never had a problem with him, he droned on and on about the MU2, but whatever… then I became a BT sponsor and he found out that the rules were different for sponsors, it pissed him off and he began to grind the axe. I try to start threads that are engaging and informative, for no other reason than I enjoy Beechtalk and like the fact that it’s a source of ACCURATE information for aircraft buyers. My career and passion is protecting aircraft buyers and when false or misleading information gets shared, I’m going to say something. Mike goes to the minutiae to try to find something, some edge, some slight error I have made… I’m not perfect, but if I make a mistake or share inaccurate information, I will admit it, own it and apologize. This trying to find some angle is what causes the back and forth, I’d encourage anyone who thinks I am wrong to go back and read this thread, you’ll see what I am talking about. I am thankful Mike listened to me and bought a Citation V, they really are great airplanes. So are the CJ’s. We have clients who own several 525’s, I’ll get some actual rates for TAP Blue and share them. Fun fact, JetAcq has helped clients acquire more Citation V’s than any other model of jet.  lest someone try again to paint me as someone who doesn’t like Legacy Citations.
Last edited on 09 Dec 2023, 18:12, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 16:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/18/16 Posts: 90 Post Likes: +84
Aircraft: King Air C90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Let’s add some assumptions to help narrow the field of potential airplanes a bit :
1. Client wants nonstop flights all the time. Time is important and one of the major drivers in the decision to purchase their own airplane. The desire to save time and thereby increase productivity for the company.
2. No annual budget limitations - yet. Ultimately the annual budget will play a large role in the airplane purchased and the client is looking for the best annual budget to accomplish the mission.
3. Yes - I agree let’s cap the age. 1990 and newer airplanes only. Destination and based runway lengths are a big part of this. Citation 501/550/560 or CJ1 series would fit the purchase budget but wouldn't work for shorter runways. For shorter runways it is hard to beat a TBM700C2/850, it has the range
Sorry Terry, I should have added that too. My mistake.
Airplane would be based at a 5,000 ft runway. Shortest conceivable runway need (at this point with the client) would be DNL for the Masters.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 16:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/20/09 Posts: 2516 Post Likes: +2053 Company: Jcrane, Inc. Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ok, I’m off my box. I’ll propose a comparison to get this going :
Buyer has $1.5-1.7m to spend. Needs to move 4 people (let’s assume 200 lbs each) to various cities several times per week - let’s say every Tuesday and Thursday. Longest leg is Atlanta - Houston / Atlanta - Boston and will be done 1 time per month. The other flights will all be between 200-400 miles. They are risk adverse, but financially very sound and can absorb the “cost of doing business”. They would prefer these trips to be day trips to maximize their time. Otherwise they would just keep doing these trips via airlines over 3 days.
Tell me which airplane is the best for this mission. Show your work to include the cost of capital, ALL Maintenace reserves (you must account for engines…) and fuel at $5/gallon - because that’s what it is here in Atlanta. This is what we chose for that exact mission. Doesn't fall within your age range, but I think it will be tough to beat. To be fair, I have zero history to prove my assumption, we'll see.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Jack N441M N107XX Bubbles Up
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 17:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/07/21 Posts: 405 Post Likes: +391
Aircraft: M20J/R, Sr22, SR20
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ok, I’m off my box. I’ll propose a comparison to get this going :
Buyer has $1.5-1.7m to spend. Needs to move 4 people (let’s assume 200 lbs each) to various cities several times per week - let’s say every Tuesday and Thursday. Longest leg is Atlanta - Houston / Atlanta - Boston and will be done 1 time per month. The other flights will all be between 200-400 miles. They are risk adverse, but financially very sound and can absorb the “cost of doing business”. They would prefer these trips to be day trips to maximize their time. Otherwise they would just keep doing these trips via airlines over 3 days.
Tell me which airplane is the best for this mission. Show your work to include the cost of capital, ALL Maintenace reserves (you must account for engines…) and fuel at $5/gallon - because that’s what it is here in Atlanta. This is what we chose for that exact mission. Doesn't fall within your age range, but I think it will be tough to beat. To be fair, I have zero history to prove my assumption, we'll see.
Jack what is that?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 18:17 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7949 Post Likes: +10296 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 2024 Rates:
Mustang through Cessna Poweradvantage+: $418
Williams Tap Blue:
CJ: $418
CJ2: $464
CJ2+: $460
CJ3+: $470
I passed these rates on to our managed owners (6/10 are Williams owners), want to guess how many complained? Rhymes with hero, starts with a z.
-Gateway Jets / The Citation Jet Exchange Thanks Corey! Appreciate the accurate data! I don’t have anyone in a CJ4, but I’ll ask Crandall. Sounds like it may be the only Williams powered Citation at $500
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 18:58 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 7949 Post Likes: +10296 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
CJ4 is $491.76
As Crandall pointed out, not as bad as last year. He echoes what Corey's clients have said, not a big deal, less than expected. He also said that any time he has an issue Williams sends the Cavalry, so he's happy with them.
Everything is going up, it’s just the reality of what we are experiencing economy wise.
We’re probably going to have to raise our fees, even though I have been extremely reluctant to do so, the fact is our cost have gone up, airfare, rental cars, and hotels are all way up, each trip I take now cost almost twice as much as it did. Insurance, rent and office expenses are all up.
The reality is you're lucky if today's dollar is .75 cents (compared to 2019)
It seems like I once said that our response to the Covid Pandemic was "The Costliest Mistake in History"
Well, we're paying that bill now.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 19:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3388 Post Likes: +4877 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: BTW, I can show the other half all the stats about SETP's, but she loved the SR22 for the chute and felt super comfy at night over nothing land. I know, I know....but can't change her mind.
I would find someone to take her for a ride in a P46T. Very good chance she changes her mind when she sees what climbing at 1500 fpm into smooth air in fully protected mostly weather free class A airspace, while in pressurized comfort, climbing faster than the SR22 cruises. I had an SR22 when We bought our Mirage. The family never wanted to get in the SR22 again. Kept it for a while, thinking I would use it on short trips, but was only flying to keep the engine healthy, so let it go. Planes are only as safe as their pilot at the controls. But a turbine is far less likely to be the weak link in the accident chain. The Cirrus is a fine plane, but the capability, comfort and reliability of the turbine is quite a bit more than the Cirrus.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 09 Dec 2023, 23:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/20/09 Posts: 2516 Post Likes: +2053 Company: Jcrane, Inc. Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jack what is that?
C441 Sal
_________________ Jack N441M N107XX Bubbles Up
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 10 Dec 2023, 00:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5957 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ok, so here's my rub to it. I need to go 1000 miles at least 2X a month, then most other trips 400RT miles 2X a month then local.
I've talked to a bunch of folks on here, seems the SETP works well for a lot of what we want, BUT, we will and want to fly a lot of trips later in the day into the evening. I know the SETP stats and reliability, however, the other half is not crazy in a SE at night over terrain. I don't want a piston, needs to be pressurized, and don't want a KA90. Seems they won't do what we need. The 90 is slow, doesn't have the legs, but they have 2 engines.
BTW, I can show the other half all the stats about SETP's, but she loved the SR22 for the chute and felt super comfy at night over nothing land. I know, I know....but can't change her mind.
We looked at PBarons, but I don't want a piston. Meridians don't have the legs, but still an option, but then won't do the late flights we like to do. The 900+ series TBM more expensive the our budget right now, though we could do a SLS600, late model. But again, she's not crazy about SE.
Oh the world problems we have to figure out.
Sal, I know you ideally said you didn't want a piston, but a really tricked out Aerostar will not only beat a KA90 in speed, it will offer all the comforts of a turbine at a piston price. I can honestly say I should have never sold my 601P and just kept it. But I also got bitten by the turbine bug. Now, if you gotta go turbine, how about a Turbo Commander? Nice and roomy, speedy and not too bad on the wallet. I would say MU-2, but the reality is they're bit range challenged compared to a TC. A long wing Jetrop Turbo Commander, will easily duo 1500nm at 300kts with the -10's.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|