banner
banner

24 Jan 2026, 13:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2014, 22:23 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/09/11
Posts: 1775
Post Likes: +832
Company: Wings Insurance
Location: Eden Prairie, MN / Scottsdale, AZ
Aircraft: 2016 Cirrus SR22 G5
Username Protected wrote:

Doesn't appear that it does.


It's all good Sean :thumbup:
I'm sure the question is an exercise run by many getting into that class of business .....

_________________
Tom Hauge
Wings Insurance
National Sales Director
E-mail: thauge@wingsinsurance.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2014, 22:47 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21128
Post Likes: +26603
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
What is this thread now anyways? It has creeped and morphed way beyond is the cirrus viable. Chute vs no chute, single vs twin, is night IFR single safe, pro vs owner flown safety, best twin, TBM vs Pilatus, how much for insurance...

All those factors apply to the SF50 and its potential success and should be discussed.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 00:33 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/26/10
Posts: 4296
Post Likes: +197
Location: West Palm Beach, FL (KLNA)
Aircraft: 1979 Duke B60
Username Protected wrote:
Its time for this thread to die


Michael, where you been. We're going to be talking up the eclipse next. Never had a fatality. That's impressive.


None?!? Not a bad record for VLJs... :shrug:

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 00:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7099
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:

Michael, where you been. We're going to be talking up the eclipse next. Never had a fatality. That's impressive.


None?!? Not a bad record for VLJs... :shrug:


That's what I thought. Sheez, saw that and started to look at the Eclipse. That's impressive in my humble opinion.
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 01:49 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21128
Post Likes: +26603
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
That's what I thought. Sheez, saw that and started to look at the Eclipse. That's impressive in my humble opinion.

Made even more impressive considering a good number of Eclipse pilots are piston transitions.

The thing that washed out Eclipse pilots was not being a twin or FL410, it was basic instrument skills and airmanship at 300 knots. The SF50 will be no different.

The point is that any pilot that can handle a 300 knot airplane can handle two jet engines.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 06:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Username Protected wrote:

I was just curious as to the cost of that level of insurance. That number does not include hull does it?

That's all in Erwin :D ...hull and liability...


Impressive!

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 15:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/18/13
Posts: 1152
Post Likes: +770
Aircraft: 737
I'm not understanding why the speed really matters. It's not as if things are happening so fast at 300KTAS that you're not still sitting around looking at gauges most of the time waiting for the next instruction, and if you did get overwhelmed by the speed, couldn't you just throttle back?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 16:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I'm not understanding why the speed really matters. It's not as if things are happening so fast at 300KTAS that you're not still sitting around looking at gauges most of the time waiting for the next instruction, and if you did get overwhelmed by the speed, couldn't you just throttle back?

Agreed. It's no big deal.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 18:10 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/01/12
Posts: 513
Post Likes: +409
Company: Minnesota Flight
Aircraft: M20M,PA28,PA18,CE500
Agree. The speed in cruise really only makes a difference as to how long you sit there bored. It's an ego thing to say you have to be a great pilot on top of your game to handle 300 knots. BS.
It all comes down workload on arrival and departure.
An autopilot and a second pilot make it a breeze.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 18:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/27/08
Posts: 3471
Post Likes: +1510
Location: Galveston, TX
Aircraft: Malibu PA46-310P
55 pages and no poll?

The SF50 will be:
A. Wildly successful
B. Break even for cirrus
c. Bankrupt cirrus
D. Etc...

Or something like that.

Kevin


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 18:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13718
Post Likes: +7892
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Username Protected wrote:
55 pages and no poll?

The SF50 will be:
A. Wildly successful
B. Break even for cirrus
c. Bankrupt cirrus
D. Etc...

Or something like that.

Kevin

viewtopic.php?f=49&t=100686&hilit=sf50+poll

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 18:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/14/08
Posts: 3133
Post Likes: +2674
Location: KGBR
Aircraft: D50
viewtopic.php?f=49&t=100686&view=unread#unread

there's a poll - currently

67 percent predicting success
31 percent predicting certified but a failure
and one guy who thinks it won't get certified.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 18:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/15/11
Posts: 1056
Post Likes: +1055
Location: Elk City, OK
Aircraft: B55 P2 & 210
Make that two guys.

Sincerely,
Bobby Southard

_________________
Sincerely,
Bobby Southard


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 18:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
31% think it will fail and 0% took me up on my bet. WTF?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 15 Dec 2014, 20:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/27/08
Posts: 3471
Post Likes: +1510
Location: Galveston, TX
Aircraft: Malibu PA46-310P
Username Protected wrote:
http://www.beechtalk.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=100686&view=unread#unread

there's a poll - currently

67 percent predicting success
31 percent predicting certified but a failure
and one guy who thinks it won't get certified.


Thanks guys! My vote is in.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.ElectroairTile.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.