16 May 2025, 19:47 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 922 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Then what's Google good for? Porn? It’s not 100% fact by a long way. Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.
Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/16/10 Posts: 2023 Post Likes: +899 Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.
To spread some misinformation
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 922 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So you're saying "neither source is a good source of information? [/quote] You lost me, what’s the second source? Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.
Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 922 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's what I'm asking you I was referring back to Clint’s comments on below with the photo of the guy in the SF50. [quote=“Tom Drew”]No matter how hard I try, I cannot come to the conclusion that Mr. MU2 has life figured out and this guy doesn't.[/quote] Mr. Mu2 has told us why the SF50:wont get certified, won’t get past 280 with reference quoted left right and centre and the dude if flying one around dispite all of this. Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13079 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mr. Mu2 has told us why the SF50:wont get certified, won’t get past 280 with reference quoted left right and centre and the dude if flying one around dispite all of this.
Andrew
Ohhhhhh.... yes. I agree.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 30 Jan 2019, 10:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 922 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mr. Mu2 has told us why the SF50:wont get certified, won’t get past 280 with reference quoted left right and centre and the dude if flying one around dispite all of this.
Andrew
Ohhhhhh.... yes. I agree.
I’m Certain you even won a bet somewhere in the last 500 pages!
Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 02:44 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/25/15 Posts: 201 Post Likes: +192
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Because a piston twin demands precise, quick, and correct action to handle an engine out on a plane that can just barely fly if you are perfect. If you fail, the plane kills you.
This is not true in a jet. There's no engine to feather. There's no large asymmetric thrust to cause a Vmc roll over. There's more than enough power to fly away on one engine. A jet does not have the faults of a piston airplane. That is, in fact, the main point here. The SF50 is sold on the basis of piston beliefs that do not apply.
Mike C. Mike, have you ever flown a V1 cut in a jet? It is way, WAY, more violent maneuver than anything in a piston twin. a) the plane will yaw, violently. b) even more so if you give it a reverser deployed failure c) if you want to go crazy, try a compressor stall. d) the asymmetric thrust is HUGE, and it will flip you upside down very quickly if you don't do it correctly. Much faster than a Vmc roll. And because the plane has plenty of rudder authority, you can also flip it upside down the other direction if you just go full piston mode with the rudder and stomp on it. In the jet I'm training in, you need about 75% of opposite rudder to compensate for the yaw. 100% would flip you upside down the other way though. Piston twin single engine stuff is child's play compared to jets. It is way easier to kill yourself in a jet V1 cut than a twin piston engine failure. The speeds, forces required etc aren't even close.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 03 Feb 2019, 09:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/11/15 Posts: 173 Post Likes: +119 Company: Trailhead Partners Location: Austin, TX
Aircraft: 182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It is way, WAY, more violent maneuver than anything in a piston twin. a) the plane will yaw, violently. Not even close to accurate in my limited Citation experience. OEI is about close to a non-emergency as an emergency can be.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|