banner
banner

16 May 2025, 19:47 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13079
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:22 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 922
Post Likes: +466
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
Then what's Google good for?


Porn?

It’s not 100% fact by a long way.


Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13079
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:30 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/16/10
Posts: 2023
Post Likes: +899
Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
Username Protected wrote:
Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.


To spread some misinformation

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 922
Post Likes: +466
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
So you're saying "neither source is a good source of information?
[/quote]

You lost me, what’s the second source?

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:35 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13079
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Haha, one has google the other doesn’t need it.

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 922
Post Likes: +466
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
That's what I'm asking you


I was referring back to Clint’s comments on below with the photo of the guy in the SF50.

[quote=“Tom Drew”]No matter how hard I try, I cannot come to the conclusion that Mr. MU2 has life figured out and this guy doesn't.[/quote]

Mr. Mu2 has told us why the SF50:wont get certified, won’t get past 280 with reference quoted left right and centre and the dude if flying one around dispite all of this.

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 09:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13079
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

Mr. Mu2 has told us why the SF50:wont get certified, won’t get past 280 with reference quoted left right and centre and the dude if flying one around dispite all of this.

Andrew

Ohhhhhh.... yes. I agree.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 30 Jan 2019, 10:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 922
Post Likes: +466
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:

Mr. Mu2 has told us why the SF50:wont get certified, won’t get past 280 with reference quoted left right and centre and the dude if flying one around dispite all of this.

Andrew

Ohhhhhh.... yes. I agree.


I’m Certain you even won a bet somewhere in the last 500 pages!

Andrew

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2019, 08:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13398
Post Likes: +7477
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCnwxBsij ... t4Q/videos

A channel of Vision vids.

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2019, 11:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13398
Post Likes: +7477
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
[youtube]http://youtu.be/S3OPlmc7hNk[/youtube]

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2019, 02:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/25/15
Posts: 201
Post Likes: +192
Username Protected wrote:
Because a piston twin demands precise, quick, and correct action to handle an engine out on a plane that can just barely fly if you are perfect. If you fail, the plane kills you.

This is not true in a jet. There's no engine to feather. There's no large asymmetric thrust to cause a Vmc roll over. There's more than enough power to fly away on one engine. A jet does not have the faults of a piston airplane. That is, in fact, the main point here. The SF50 is sold on the basis of piston beliefs that do not apply.

Mike C.


Mike, have you ever flown a V1 cut in a jet?

It is way, WAY, more violent maneuver than anything in a piston twin.
a) the plane will yaw, violently.
b) even more so if you give it a reverser deployed failure
c) if you want to go crazy, try a compressor stall.
d) the asymmetric thrust is HUGE, and it will flip you upside down very quickly if you don't do it correctly. Much faster than a Vmc roll. And because the plane has plenty of rudder authority, you can also flip it upside down the other direction if you just go full piston mode with the rudder and stomp on it. In the jet I'm training in, you need about 75% of opposite rudder to compensate for the yaw. 100% would flip you upside down the other way though. Piston twin single engine stuff is child's play compared to jets.

It is way easier to kill yourself in a jet V1 cut than a twin piston engine failure. The speeds, forces required etc aren't even close.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2019, 09:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12804
Post Likes: +5254
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
I’ve never flown a jet, but... show me the bodies

Easy easy to find examples of piston (and turboprop) engine outs gone bad.

Pretty hard to find them in jets. Nobody’s ever been killed in a sim when an out of control engine out citation comes through the roof of the training facility.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2019, 09:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13398
Post Likes: +7477
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
Give me the jet any day. A Citation and a 421C are probably the closest comparisons. I’ve flown both and there is no question which I’d rather lose an engine in.

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2019, 09:53 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/11/15
Posts: 173
Post Likes: +119
Company: Trailhead Partners
Location: Austin, TX
Aircraft: 182
Username Protected wrote:
It is way, WAY, more violent maneuver than anything in a piston twin.
a) the plane will yaw, violently.


Not even close to accurate in my limited Citation experience. OEI is about close to a non-emergency as an emergency can be.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 499, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505 ... 512  Next



Aviation Fabricators (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Elite-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.