22 Dec 2025, 13:07 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 20:01 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 36213 Post Likes: +14549 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My biggest fears for him "first flight" are a runaway over-rotation and/or uncontrollable wing flexing....
Even an innocuous-seeming high speed taxi and the effort of "just trying to get the weight off the nose wheel" could turn very ugly very quickly From the video it sure looks like any rotation beyond just lifting the nosewheel off the ground will trim the prop.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 20:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/06/19 Posts: 139 Post Likes: +45 Company: Water Cleaners
Aircraft: Pilatus PC-12 NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chris
So the bearing clearance is the same on a auto engine and marine engine? You are saying the Long block is identical for a GM 454 and Merc 454? All you have to do is change the freeze plugs? Is this what your saying?
You should tell all the boat manufacturers that they have been getting ripped off all these years. Why don’t they just buy GM crate motors and change the freeze plugs?
Mike Let's take this one piece at a time Mike. Can you show me a reference on bearing clearance being different in marinized vs OEM auto engines? Will be the first I have heard of it.
Last edited on 24 Oct 2019, 07:06, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 21:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12198 Post Likes: +3085 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chris
Sorry to be part of this thread drift. Really need to drop this convo and back to the topic.
Really no benefit for either of us in this discussion. Unless maybe you or I are going to start selling marine engines. Haha. I know I am not.
Mike Mike, Via my dad, I have been involved in replacing two boat engines. One was on a Ski Nautique; and yes this was a "customized" engine. The other was in a Chris Craft. For the Chris Craft, they literally bought a crate engine from GM. Nothing custom about it. Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 22:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/29/10 Posts: 5660 Post Likes: +4882 Company: USAF Simulator Instructor Location: Wichita Valley Airport (F14)
Aircraft: Bonanza G35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Cars only need about 20hp on the highway. I dunno about only 20hp. 80+mph for hours at a time (pretty common for a family sedan with a four cylinder or a small six), getting 20-25mpg, that's 3-4gph and a lot more than 20hp. If running LOP, 3gph is 3 x 14.9 = 45 hp. True, that’s more than 20 hp but with a 200 hp engine it’s only 23% power. My pickup burns 3.5gph at highway speeds. With 250 hp under the hood, that’s about 20% power.
_________________ FTFA RTFM
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 22:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/09/14 Posts: 115 Post Likes: +146
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Fact still stands that if aircraft and auto engines were interchangeable we would be in a much better place in GA than we are.
Mike You mean like a Porsche Mooney??? 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 23:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/12 Posts: 152 Post Likes: +134
|
|
|
Gasoline powered cars are not allowed to run lean of peak in the US due to emission controls, not kidding.
I have also heard that boat engines have looser tolerances on the main bearings, but I've never checked.
I also tune LS engines, mostly for off road racing, but some street stuff. I see no problem running an LS motor at 75% power or more for long periods of time as long as you have designed adequate cooling and running a proper tune and fuel. Hell we ran an 180,000 mile 6.0 in the 50th Baja 1000 and took 4th in our class! The LS can take it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 23 Oct 2019, 23:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/15 Posts: 1552 Post Likes: +674 Location: Dalton, Ga. KDNN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Fact still stands that if aircraft and auto engines were interchangeable we would be in a much better place in GA than we are.
Mike You mean like a Porsche Mooney???
That proves Mikes point...... the Porsche Mooney was a flop !!
_________________ Mooney Bravo & Just Superstol
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 24 Oct 2019, 01:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16989 Post Likes: +28897 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
|
as a point of information, engine manufacturers speak of engine load factor in terms of fuel consumption. For example if an engine burns 500L/hr of diesel at full power then 1000 hours at full power would use 500,000 L. If you download the engine ECM after 1000hr and find that it used 100,000L of fuel then the application for that engine is a 20% load factor.
A load factor of 60-70% would be exceptionally high. The only applications that routinely run that are ag tractors and prime power gensets. Look at a tractor if you want to see the size of 300hp diesel engine that can do that and survive.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 24 Oct 2019, 02:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1706 Post Likes: +1589 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Gasoline powered cars are not allowed to run lean of peak in the US due to emission controls, not kidding.
I have also heard that boat engines have looser tolerances on the main bearings, but I've never checked.
I also tune LS engines, mostly for off road racing, but some street stuff. I see no problem running an LS motor at 75% power or more for long periods of time as long as you have designed adequate cooling and running a proper tune and fuel. Hell we ran an 180,000 mile 6.0 in the 50th Baja 1000 and took 4th in our class! The LS can take it. Marcus Great to see a fellow OffRoad person on here. We race 6100 (spec LS3) and ran the Baja 1k last year. Our number is 6122 (221 for score) Whipple Superchargers is our main sponsor. So we have a great engine partner. If you ever see us at a race stop and say hi. We run the BITD series and a occasional Score, Snore. Here is a pic from two weeks ago at the Laughlin race. Pretty sure I can log PIC time for some of this race. Haha. Mike
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 24 Oct 2019, 06:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/30/17 Posts: 1410 Post Likes: +1617 Location: KARR
Aircraft: J3, Twin Commander
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Fact still stands that if aircraft and auto engines were interchangeable we would be in a much better place in GA than we are.
Mike You mean like a Porsche Mooney???
And the Orenda Commander.

http://www.epi-eng.com/aircraft_engine_ ... xtbadexamp Tldr- Impractical because of weight. I think this bit from the above information is relevant to the thread - “The Bottom Line is: JUST HOW COMPETENT AN AIRCRAFT DESIGNER ARE YOU?”
_________________ What are you optimizing for?
Last edited on 24 Oct 2019, 18:34, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 24 Oct 2019, 07:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/06/19 Posts: 139 Post Likes: +45 Company: Water Cleaners
Aircraft: Pilatus PC-12 NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chris
Sorry to be part of this thread drift. Really need to drop this convo and back to the topic.
Really no benefit for either of us in this discussion. Unless maybe you or I are going to start selling marine engines. Haha. I know I am not.
Mike It is not thread drift Mike. You have made some outrageous and inaccurate comments in regards to both the Raptor and the components chosen to build it. When challenged on those comments you then doubled down in other areas you obviously also have zero competence in/knowledge of to support your first erroneous claims. And know, when being called on the carpet point by point to defend the undefendable position you have constructed for yourself it is all falling apart because the facts just are not there. I appreciate you going through the exercise with me and helping me, and perhaps others, pick a more accurate bias in regards to judging the comments you make in the future on this and perhaps other subjects. That is kind of you. --Chris
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 24 Oct 2019, 07:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/06/19 Posts: 139 Post Likes: +45 Company: Water Cleaners
Aircraft: Pilatus PC-12 NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chris, The first post in this thread, written by Stan Musick, might be useful to you: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=172432&p=2478681#p2478681Dean, I appreciate the sentiment in both the post that Mr. Musik penned, and the fact that you shared it with me. Thank you. I agree, let us extend kindness and understanding. I also appreciate the sentiment (more fully) in the tag line in your profile. "TRUTH is AUTHORITY..... Authority is not Truth" I tried to walk the line dictated by all three. I tried to understand (and examine) the man's claims and the nature of them. I tried to be kind. Even told him I appreciated him and he was kind. I know that truth is the authority. Tricky to combine all three. Am open to suggestions on improving my performance. Thank you. --Chris
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|