06 May 2025, 17:02 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 17:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3137 Post Likes: +2282 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Long and short of this thread:
The Diamond 50 RG will have very limited acceptance. Anybody want to bet a tank of avgas it is not in, or will be out of production in less than three years?
Jg Given the size of their waiting list on everything else they make, I'll take that bet.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 09 Sep 2020, 17:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/30/18 Posts: 2461 Post Likes: +2154 Location: NH
Aircraft: F33A, 757/767
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Long and short of this thread:
The Diamond 50 RG will have very limited acceptance. Anybody want to bet a tank of avgas it is not in, or will be out of production in less than three years?
Jg I'll also take that bet. Need to place a order for tip tanks ASAP....
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 08:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9015 Post Likes: +17213 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Long and short of this thread:
The Diamond 50 RG will have very limited acceptance. Anybody want to bet a tank of avgas it is not in, or will be out of production in less than three years?
Jg Given the size of their waiting list on everything else they make, I'll take that bet.
John,
You're on. Flag this post. Now, you airplane holds more than mine so we will use the Cessna 180 tank as the bet: 60 gallons and fuel prices at my hangar. This airplane will not be in production in the U.S. in September, 2023.
Jg
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 09:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/24/08 Posts: 2823 Post Likes: +1109
Aircraft: Cessna 182M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Given the size of their waiting list on everything else they make, I'll take that bet.
John, You're on. Flag this post. Now, you airplane holds more than mine so we will use the Cessna 180 tank as the bet: 60 gallons and fuel prices at my hangar. This airplane will not be in production in the U.S. in September, 2023. Jg[/quote] JGG Just lawyering here - it will never be in production in the US. They plan to build them in Austria I believe. RAS
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 09:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/12 Posts: 3027 Post Likes: +5452 Company: French major Location: France
Aircraft: Ejet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Given the size of their waiting list on everything else they make, I'll take that bet.
John, You're on. Flag this post. Now, you airplane holds more than mine so we will use the Cessna 180 tank as the bet: 60 gallons and fuel prices at my hangar. This airplane will not be in production in the U.S. in September, 2023. Jg
JGG
Just lawyering here - it will never be in production in the US. They plan to build them in Austria I believe.
RAS[/quote]
Is there a Diamond factory in the US? I seem to remember it was in Austria and Canada.
_________________ Singham!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 10:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/30/17 Posts: 198 Post Likes: +159
|
|
I think the new Mooney owners’ plan is to increase the UL of the Acclaim and Ovation, then add a BRS. That will take a little time to be sure from a certification perspective, but that will make some difference in sales. How much of a difference remains to be seen, but I think they will sell more than they had been selling.
However, the cabin is small relative to the competition and at least from my personal experience, not a cabin I would choose to sit in for a long cross country. Especially with someone else up front. Admittedly, I’m bigger than I should be, but so are most US pilots.
I’m in the minority here but I like the looks of the new Diamond single. Having said that, the range and speed are underwhelming. As noted above, I would MUCH rather have a Panthera than the Diamond. Better performance, comparable fuel economy and if my memory is correct, the version of the Lycoming 540 Pipistrel is using will run on mogas as well as avgas ...
As an experimental aircraft it won’t be FIKI but it will have de-icing (probably TKS but that’s not clear) as well as BRS and A/C as options. The certified version whenever they get that done will have FIKI. 4 seats vs 5 in the Diamond but great performance, trailing link gear and good fuel economy (plus you can recover normally from a 10-turn spin should you find yourself in that situation). Pipistrel’s main issue has been their fascination with the technology versus actually getting a plane to market but it looks like they are finally starting to do that ...
As a result of competition from Cirrus at one end and Pipistrel at the other, for example, I think the Diamond will have some headwinds but I appreciate that they are continuing to innovate and bring aircraft to market. The RG50 just got certified by EASA so they are definitely underway here.
Cheers
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 10:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7094 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I think the new Mooney owners’ plan is to increase the UL of the Acclaim and Ovation, then add a BRS. That will take a little time to be sure from a certification perspective, but that will make some difference in sales. How much of a difference remains to be seen, but I think they will sell more than they had been selling.
If there is a parachute on the airplane, they'll sell a bunch of them. I'd buy one over a Cirrus. It simply flies better. Quote: However, the cabin is small relative to the competition and at least from my personal experience, not a cabin I would choose to sit in for a long cross country. Especially with someone else up front. Admittedly, I’m bigger than I should be, but so are most US pilots.
If the seats are designed like the 201 MSE and the Bravo and current acclaim, you sit with your legs nicely stretched out and you're comfortable. I find that a Mooney is more comfortable on long trips with your legs in that position that in a seated position ala the Cessna 182 or the Cirrus. I'm 6'4".
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 10 Sep 2020, 11:19 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/19/10 Posts: 3153 Post Likes: +1523 Company: Keller Williams Realty Location: Madison, WI (91C)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Long and short of this thread:
The Diamond 50 RG will have very limited acceptance. Anybody want to bet a tank of avgas it is not in, or will be out of production in less than three years?
Jg If it was only going to be sold and marketed in the US, that would be a good bet. But.... This.
To give you a perspective JG: The biggest airport in Poland - Warsaw's Chopin airport has 2 FBOs on field. Only one of them sells 100LL and the prices are 1.75PLN for liter of Jet A (about $2/gal) and 9PLN for liter of 100LL (about $10/gal). The same price ratio (about 4.5:1) shows in my quick search for the entirety of Europe. And availability of 100LL gets worse by the day.
That price difference alone will more than make up any other difference between this and SR-22. And folks in Europe aren't so crazy about parachutes as we are.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 00:33 |
|
 |
|
|
Joined: 07/06/20 Posts: 1 Location: KSNA
|
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 01:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/27/19 Posts: 522 Post Likes: +256 Company: OwnShip Technology AG Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Aircraft: C33/P32R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: To give you a perspective JG: The biggest airport in Poland - Warsaw's Chopin airport has 2 FBOs on field. Only one of them sells 100LL and the prices are 1.75PLN for liter of Jet A (about $2/gal) and 9PLN for liter of 100LL (about $10/gal). The same price ratio (about 4.5:1) shows in my quick search for the entirety of Europe. And availability of 100LL gets worse by the day.
That price difference alone will more than make up any other difference between this and SR-22. And folks in Europe aren't so crazy about parachutes as we are. I‘m afraid you‘ve been misled here. The fuel prices for Jet-A are often quoted without the taxes that private owners pay on them, because AOC holders usually are exempt from them. Jet-A over here is usually 20-25% cheaper than 100LL, but not 5x like you quote. Typical prices for private owners at „cheap-ish“ airport would be $6-7/gal for Jet-A and $8-9/gal for 100LL.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 07:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9015 Post Likes: +17213 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
For clarification. John Meyers and I have a bet and since the airplane is not to be manufactured in the U.S., it needs clarification. The betting window is closed. John, since the whole point is emphasis and entertainmet, I'll let you redefine the terms to your satisfaction. I will suggest this: The bet is for 60 gallons of av gas that the Diamond 50RG will or will not be after September 1, 2023, 1. Be actively marketed in the U.S. and 2. Sell 5 or more new aircraft in the preceding six month period of March-September, 2003. Other than the amount of 60 gallons, it is your call entirely. You set the bet. If you don't want to bother, that's fine too, we'll just use the parameters for enjoyable entertainment. Jg
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 11 Sep 2020, 08:34 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/09 Posts: 36 Post Likes: +5
Aircraft: M20K
|
|
Quote: If the seats are designed like the 201 MSE and the Bravo and current acclaim, you sit with your legs nicely stretched out and you're comfortable. I find that a Mooney is more comfortable on long trips with your legs in that position that in a seated position ala the Cessna 182 or the Cirrus. Absolutely. I’m 6’8.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 16 Sep 2020, 00:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3137 Post Likes: +2282 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For clarification. John Meyers and I have a bet and since the airplane is not to be manufactured in the U.S., it needs clarification. The betting window is closed. John, since the whole point is emphasis and entertainmet, I'll let you redefine the terms to your satisfaction. I will suggest this: The bet is for 60 gallons of av gas that the Diamond 50RG will or will not be after September 1, 2023, 1. Be actively marketed in the U.S. and 2. Sell 5 or more new aircraft in the preceding six month period of March-September, 2003. Other than the amount of 60 gallons, it is your call entirely. You set the bet. If you don't want to bother, that's fine too, we'll just use the parameters for enjoyable entertainment. Jg I’ll buy a round at Oshkosh if either of us remember this thread in three years.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Diamond 50 RG Posted: 16 Sep 2020, 07:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/11 Posts: 9015 Post Likes: +17213 Location: KGNF, Grenada, MS
Aircraft: Baron, 180,195,J-3
|
|
Username Protected wrote: For clarification. John Meyers and I have a bet and since the airplane is not to be manufactured in the U.S., it needs clarification. The betting window is closed. John, since the whole point is emphasis and entertainmet, I'll let you redefine the terms to your satisfaction. I will suggest this: The bet is for 60 gallons of av gas that the Diamond 50RG will or will not be after September 1, 2023, 1. Be actively marketed in the U.S. and 2. Sell 5 or more new aircraft in the preceding six month period of March-September, 2003. Other than the amount of 60 gallons, it is your call entirely. You set the bet. If you don't want to bother, that's fine too, we'll just use the parameters for enjoyable entertainment. Jg I’ll buy a round at Oshkosh if either of us remember this thread in three years.
John,
I'll drink to that.
Jg
_________________ Waste no time with fools. They have nothing to lose.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|