banner
banner

06 Nov 2025, 09:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 15:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7651
Post Likes: +5040
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Is GA dying?

Heavens no. It evolves with the times, ebbs and flows with the economy, and generally changes over time. LIKE EVERY OTHER HUMAN ENDEAVOR UNDER THE SUN. :shrug:

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 16:14 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/22/14
Posts: 10334
Post Likes: +20956
Company: Mountain Airframe LLC
Location: Mena, Arkansas
Username Protected wrote:
I apologize if this sounds arrogant,
but... I'm a retired machinist.
It's all I ever did for a living.

I look at things a little differently when it comes to engineering and build quality than others.

It goes far beyond judging something from sitting in it.

those days are long gone and the people who built in beechcraft quality are long dead

Check out a recent build G36 and look at how the doors (don't) fit. Crawl up in the wheel wells and look around with a mirror. Check the rivet heads that aren't easy to see.

Cirrus aces new Beech pistons in any quality metric you can think of.

I guess the new 2019 G58 that showed up at my shop a couple months ago was the only one sold last quarter (according to Mike C.s post). The rivet lines, skin laps, unfinished skin edges, sloppy riveting, sloppy fillet seal around the windows, the paint had blowouts around rivet heads and looked like a 5yo touched-up with a sponge brush.................it looked nice from a distance, but the quality is definitely lacking.
The interior was really nice, but the owner paid extra for black leather and fancy stitching.
_________________
If a diligent man puts his energy into the exclusive effort, a molehill can be made into a mountain


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 16:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/24/10
Posts: 9080
Post Likes: +7446
Disheartening to hear that.
I think the workmanship in my S35 is top notch.
Sad to hear it's gone downhill.

Darn it...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 17:02 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 909
Post Likes: +726
How does Textron even maintain an assembly line for one delivery per quarter? I assume they are working on multiple airframes and probably aren't very proficient on any of them.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 17:16 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/20/15
Posts: 10
Post Likes: +21
Location: East TN
Aircraft: TBM9 KA90 BE36
Username Protected wrote:
One of the arguments for a Bonanza or a Baron is that it's still in production. Based on Mike C's sales figures, this won't be the case for much longer. Time to move on, probably.

Did anyone spend time at the TBM tent? I'm curious to hear whether they got the 'vibe' right in the same way Cirrus did.



Being a TBM owner I spent quite a bit of time in the TBM booth watching the air show a couple of afternoons. I watched the director of sales spend an hour sitting in the sun on the wing of a 940 talking to someone sitting in the pilots seat. When he came by I asked if he sold it and he said their job was not to sell at Oshkosh but to create desire and goodwill. In hopes if an when someone made a decision to purchase, hopefully it would be their product. Others could learn from his approach.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 17:31 
Online



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/22/14
Posts: 10334
Post Likes: +20956
Company: Mountain Airframe LLC
Location: Mena, Arkansas
Username Protected wrote:
Disheartening to hear that.
I think the workmanship in my S35 is top notch.
Sad to hear it's gone downhill.

Darn it...

Arnie,
Your S model was the era when Beech reached the pinnacle of airframe build quality, in my opinion. Everything prior to that was great, of course, but the evolution of the processes and the experienced labor force were at its peak. This continued through the late 70s; again, my opinion.

As with many things, when the experienced and quality conscious employees begin to retire, and new management/employees replace them, it's not the same business. The product is just a husk of what it once was.

_________________
If a diligent man puts his energy into the exclusive effort, a molehill can be made into a mountain


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 17:47 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20732
Post Likes: +26183
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Mooney has been on life support for over a decade.

Mooney bankruptcies:

1930.

Almost in 1954, saved at the last minute by two investors.

1969.

2001.

2004 (holding company).

Almost in 2011, down to 10 employees, eventually bought by the Chinese.

I wouldn't make any long term plans if I am a Mooney employee.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 17:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/16/13
Posts: 2205
Post Likes: +1640
Location: NW Oklahoma (6K4)
Aircraft: Bonanza G33
They should hire the sales people at the massage chair booths to man the Beech/Textron locations.

_________________
"Lucky"


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 18:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/27/18
Posts: 1650
Post Likes: +1521
Location: South NorthEast West Virginia :)
Aircraft: Club Archer
Obviously not Oshkosh, but Textron had some planes and reps at the AOPA fly-in at FDK this spring. They just sat around a table talking to each other. After standing there a while and not getting much attention, I waited for a break and just blurted out, “Where’s Mindy?” Got the dirty looks I was expecting, smiled, and walked off.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 18:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/09/09
Posts: 4267
Post Likes: +901
Username Protected wrote:
Obviously not Oshkosh, but Textron had some planes and reps at the AOPA fly-in at FDK this spring. They just sat around a table talking to each other. After standing there a while and not getting much attention, I waited for a break and just blurted out, “Where’s Mindy?” Got the dirty looks I was expecting, smiled, and walked off.


Lolol


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 22:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/26/16
Posts: 476
Post Likes: +692
Username Protected wrote:
Mooney has been on life support for over a decade.

Mooney bankruptcies:

1930.

Almost in 1954, saved at the last minute by two investors.

1969.

2001.

2004 (holding company).

Almost in 2011, down to 10 employees, eventually bought by the Chinese.

I wouldn't make any long term plans if I am a Mooney employee.

Mike C.


Horrible business model but still the finest 4 seater ever built. You'd like it if you like MU2. Efficient, built like a tank, unbreakable in the air. Control rods all around. Did I mention control rods? Go fly one. Just bummed around the Alps in an Acclaim for a couple of days. You have to be a pilot to land one unlike a Beech.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 22:33 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/13/14
Posts: 9116
Post Likes: +7642
Location: Central Texas (KTPL)
Aircraft: PA-46-310P
Username Protected wrote:
Horrible business model but still the finest 4 seater ever built. You'd like it if you like MU2. Efficient, built like a tank, unbreakable in the air. Control rods all around. Did I mention control rods? Go fly one. Just bummed around the Alps in an Acclaim for a couple of days. You have to be a pilot to land one unlike a Beech.

+1

I love the lines of the Ovation. An Ovation/Eagle with air conditioning is a remarkable travel machine for one or two people, good for another 10-15 knots over the NA A36.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 29 Jul 2019, 23:37 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20732
Post Likes: +26183
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
You'd like it if you like MU2.

They don't come in my size.

MU2 was first marketed and supported by Mooney in the USA, which ended with the 1969 bankruptcy.

Also, the "M" in "TBM" stands for Mooney.

Seems like Mooney wanted to get into turboprops but never had the chops to stay with it.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2019, 00:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/26/16
Posts: 476
Post Likes: +692
Username Protected wrote:
You'd like it if you like MU2.

They don't come in my size.


You mean you're too short? I used to be 6'2" and I fit just fine.

But seriously, I just meant take one for a spin around the pattern. Fun aircraft. Consistent from a sample to sample due to rods.

I know the rest of the story about Mooney/MU2/TBM. Like I said horrible business plan. They would be riding high had they stuck to the TBM development. Almost a perfect aircraft. Once again, you have to be a pilot to fly it unlike a PC12.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus vs Beech at Oshkosh.
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2019, 02:35 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/03/08
Posts: 16893
Post Likes: +28691
Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
Username Protected wrote:
But seriously, I just meant take one for a spin around the pattern. Fun aircraft. Consistent from a sample to sample due to rods.

tastes vary
For me, a trip around the pattern in a mooney would be as much as i can stand
Hate 'em. Feel like I'm inside a tunnel looking out through the mouth. Every time I get in one, i can't wait to get out and back into a bonanza or cessna.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 157 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 11  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.