banner
banner

16 Dec 2025, 04:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 15:43 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 10310
Post Likes: +7389
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
Dave Siciliano wins the internet today.

:)

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 15:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/16/07
Posts: 19159
Post Likes: +30951
Company: Real Estate development
Location: Addison -North Dallas(ADS), Texas
Aircraft: In between
Only funnin. Hope no one takes offense.

_________________
Dave Siciliano, ATP


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 16:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/13/14
Posts: 540
Post Likes: +261
Aircraft: Cessna T206H
Username Protected wrote:
Yes the m600 doesn’t work for me at all at 6’4”, my head sits in the cutout and it’s workable with in ear headsets, but not ideal. I sat in back and felt a bit crammed too, maybe slightly better than an A36 but not even close to my twin bonanza or a king air. Do you have a photo with 4 in the back? I love all the specs on the 600 but the cabin is a deal breaker. I haven’t sat in the SF50 yet but it looks awesome.


Yup. I’d be a Malibu or maybe Meridian owner if the cockpit had more headroom. At 6’4” I can’t fit comfortably at all and while I “might” be able to make it work, I’m not spending big money on a plane that doesn’t fit me.
I have the same problem with the Bonanza.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 16:33 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/23/10
Posts: 909
Post Likes: +726
FWIW, at 6'2" and 200#s, I fit perfectly in the left seat of my Meridian. The right seat seams to be a bit tighter and I have to recline the seat to avoid the occassional headset rub against the headliner. But, no problems in the left seat.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 16:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
FWIW, at 6'2" and 200#s, I fit perfectly in the left seat of my Meridian. The right seat seams to be a bit tighter and I have to recline the seat to avoid the occassional headset rub against the headliner. But, no problems in the left seat.

Charlie Tango is an amazing name for a pilot. How did that happen?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 17:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20385
Post Likes: +25536
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Username Protected wrote:
FWIW, at 6'2" and 200#s, I fit perfectly in the left seat of my Meridian. The right seat seams to be a bit tighter and I have to recline the seat to avoid the occassional headset rub against the headliner. But, no problems in the left seat.

Charlie Tango is an amazing name for a pilot. How did that happen?

There is nobody like that in the FAA database. :scratch:
_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 17:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Hi, I’m Charlie November.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 19:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/12/08
Posts: 7872
Post Likes: +2521
Company: Retired
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Aircraft: '76 A36 TAT TN 550
Username Protected wrote:
Dr Seuss must have been on the design team...

Mike C.

Come on, Mike.

You’ve got an MU-2 and you’re calling the SF50 ugly?
:peace:

_________________
ABS Life Member


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 19:45 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5843
Post Likes: +7297
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
Yes the m600 doesn’t work for me at all at 6’4”, my head sits in the cutout and it’s workable with in ear headsets, but not ideal. I sat in back and felt a bit crammed too, maybe slightly better than an A36 but not even close to my twin bonanza or a king air. Do you have a photo with 4 in the back? I love all the specs on the 600 but the cabin is a deal breaker. I haven’t sat in the SF50 yet but it looks awesome.


Yup. I’d be a Malibu or maybe Meridian owner if the cockpit had more headroom. At 6’4” I can’t fit comfortably at all and while I “might” be able to make it work, I’m not spending big money on a plane that doesn’t fit me.
I have the same problem with the Bonanza.

I'm 5'7", am I the shortest person on Beechtalk?? Seems like everyone of you guys are Amazons.

PS: I fit in everything
_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 20:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/11/10
Posts: 3833
Post Likes: +4140
Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
Part of the issue with the Piper's IMO is how your body is shaped vs. height. The local piper sales guy is 6'5" and fits fine. He is really skinny and ALL legs so he can just put the seat back. At 6'1" 240 32" inseam my experience is VERY different. I can't get comfortable in them no matter what I try to do.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 20:52 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/23/08
Posts: 6063
Post Likes: +716
Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
TBMs as lots of room for the crew. More than any of the smaller jets.
Move the seat as far back as you want and with the pilot door its so easy to get in & out.




Username Protected wrote:
Yes the m600 doesn’t work for me at all at 6’4”, my head sits in the cutout and it’s workable with in ear headsets, but not ideal. I sat in back and felt a bit crammed too, maybe slightly better than an A36 but not even close to my twin bonanza or a king air. Do you have a photo with 4 in the back? I love all the specs on the 600 but the cabin is a deal breaker. I haven’t sat in the SF50 yet but it looks awesome.


Yup. I’d be a Malibu or maybe Meridian owner if the cockpit had more headroom. At 6’4” I can’t fit comfortably at all and while I “might” be able to make it work, I’m not spending big money on a plane that doesn’t fit me.
I have the same problem with the Bonanza.

_________________
Former Baron 58 owner.
Pistons engines are for tractors.

Marc Bourdon


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 21:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
TBMs as lots of room for the crew. More than any of the smaller jets.
Move the seat as far back as you want and with the pilot door its so easy to get in & out.

But, the TBM is only 47” wide and 48” tall, which is tighter than a small jet. Not exactly roomy.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 21:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/01/14
Posts: 2301
Post Likes: +2082
Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
I found a Gulfstream cockpit to be too small. :scratch:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 21:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/15/11
Posts: 2610
Post Likes: +1214
Location: Mandan, ND
Aircraft: None currently
Username Protected wrote:
In keeping with Dr. Seuss :-)

You are Mike Exam

Do you like SF50 Mike exam?
I do not like it
Says Mike Exam.
I do not like it, I would ban!

Would you like it to go here or there?
I would not like it
Here or there
I would not like it anywhere?
.

Would you like it with longer legs?
Would you like it with fewer regs?
I would not like it with longer legs!
I would not like it with fewer regs.
I do not like SF50!
I do not like it says Mike Exam.

Would you like it with a higher ceiling?
Would you find that more appealing?
Would you like it with auto throttle?
Would that make you Coddle?
I would not like it with higher ceiling
I would not find that more appealing
Even with auto throttle
I would not Coddle.
I think it looks like a bottle!

I do not like SF50!
I do not like it says Mike Exam


OMG!

Well done Dave...well done!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 13 Jan 2019, 22:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
I found a Gulfstream cockpit to be too small. :scratch:


Because with few exceptions, its flown by hired help, not an owner.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, 485, 486 ... 512  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.Plane AC Tile.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.SCA.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.