16 Dec 2025, 04:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 16:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/13/14 Posts: 540 Post Likes: +261
Aircraft: Cessna T206H
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes the m600 doesn’t work for me at all at 6’4”, my head sits in the cutout and it’s workable with in ear headsets, but not ideal. I sat in back and felt a bit crammed too, maybe slightly better than an A36 but not even close to my twin bonanza or a king air. Do you have a photo with 4 in the back? I love all the specs on the 600 but the cabin is a deal breaker. I haven’t sat in the SF50 yet but it looks awesome. Yup. I’d be a Malibu or maybe Meridian owner if the cockpit had more headroom. At 6’4” I can’t fit comfortably at all and while I “might” be able to make it work, I’m not spending big money on a plane that doesn’t fit me. I have the same problem with the Bonanza.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 16:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/23/10 Posts: 909 Post Likes: +726
|
|
|
FWIW, at 6'2" and 200#s, I fit perfectly in the left seat of my Meridian. The right seat seams to be a bit tighter and I have to recline the seat to avoid the occassional headset rub against the headliner. But, no problems in the left seat.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 16:51 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: FWIW, at 6'2" and 200#s, I fit perfectly in the left seat of my Meridian. The right seat seams to be a bit tighter and I have to recline the seat to avoid the occassional headset rub against the headliner. But, no problems in the left seat. Charlie Tango is an amazing name for a pilot. How did that happen?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 17:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20385 Post Likes: +25536 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: FWIW, at 6'2" and 200#s, I fit perfectly in the left seat of my Meridian. The right seat seams to be a bit tighter and I have to recline the seat to avoid the occassional headset rub against the headliner. But, no problems in the left seat. Charlie Tango is an amazing name for a pilot. How did that happen? There is nobody like that in the FAA database.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 19:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/12/08 Posts: 7872 Post Likes: +2521 Company: Retired Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Aircraft: '76 A36 TAT TN 550
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Dr Seuss must have been on the design team...
Mike C. Come on, Mike. You’ve got an MU-2 and you’re calling the SF50 ugly? 
_________________ ABS Life Member
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 19:45 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5843 Post Likes: +7297 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yes the m600 doesn’t work for me at all at 6’4”, my head sits in the cutout and it’s workable with in ear headsets, but not ideal. I sat in back and felt a bit crammed too, maybe slightly better than an A36 but not even close to my twin bonanza or a king air. Do you have a photo with 4 in the back? I love all the specs on the 600 but the cabin is a deal breaker. I haven’t sat in the SF50 yet but it looks awesome. Yup. I’d be a Malibu or maybe Meridian owner if the cockpit had more headroom. At 6’4” I can’t fit comfortably at all and while I “might” be able to make it work, I’m not spending big money on a plane that doesn’t fit me. I have the same problem with the Bonanza. I'm 5'7", am I the shortest person on Beechtalk?? Seems like everyone of you guys are Amazons.
PS: I fit in everything
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 20:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
|
|
|
Part of the issue with the Piper's IMO is how your body is shaped vs. height. The local piper sales guy is 6'5" and fits fine. He is really skinny and ALL legs so he can just put the seat back. At 6'1" 240 32" inseam my experience is VERY different. I can't get comfortable in them no matter what I try to do.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 20:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6063 Post Likes: +716 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
TBMs as lots of room for the crew. More than any of the smaller jets. Move the seat as far back as you want and with the pilot door its so easy to get in & out. Username Protected wrote: Yes the m600 doesn’t work for me at all at 6’4”, my head sits in the cutout and it’s workable with in ear headsets, but not ideal. I sat in back and felt a bit crammed too, maybe slightly better than an A36 but not even close to my twin bonanza or a king air. Do you have a photo with 4 in the back? I love all the specs on the 600 but the cabin is a deal breaker. I haven’t sat in the SF50 yet but it looks awesome. Yup. I’d be a Malibu or maybe Meridian owner if the cockpit had more headroom. At 6’4” I can’t fit comfortably at all and while I “might” be able to make it work, I’m not spending big money on a plane that doesn’t fit me. I have the same problem with the Bonanza.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 21:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3503 Post Likes: +2476 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: TBMs as lots of room for the crew. More than any of the smaller jets. Move the seat as far back as you want and with the pilot door its so easy to get in & out. But, the TBM is only 47” wide and 48” tall, which is tighter than a small jet. Not exactly roomy.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 21:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/15/11 Posts: 2610 Post Likes: +1214 Location: Mandan, ND
Aircraft: None currently
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In keeping with Dr. Seuss :-)
You are Mike Exam
Do you like SF50 Mike exam? I do not like it Says Mike Exam. I do not like it, I would ban!
Would you like it to go here or there? I would not like it Here or there I would not like it anywhere? .
Would you like it with longer legs? Would you like it with fewer regs? I would not like it with longer legs! I would not like it with fewer regs. I do not like SF50! I do not like it says Mike Exam.
Would you like it with a higher ceiling? Would you find that more appealing? Would you like it with auto throttle? Would that make you Coddle? I would not like it with higher ceiling I would not find that more appealing Even with auto throttle I would not Coddle. I think it looks like a bottle!
I do not like SF50! I do not like it says Mike Exam OMG! Well done Dave...well done!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Jan 2019, 22:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I found a Gulfstream cockpit to be too small.  Because with few exceptions, its flown by hired help, not an owner.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|