13 Nov 2025, 14:47 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 19:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There are over 650 posts in less than a week about Cirrae on a Beech website. What's up with that? What's 'up' is the useful load on the G5 cirrus which is truly a game-changer. (funny enough, the UL on the NA SR22 is now right where the Pa24 left off 40 years ago )
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 19:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/13/10 Posts: 20351 Post Likes: +25406 Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gf8DYXUOai8 Yes, Randy, mid-air collisions often result in deaths.
_________________ Arlen Get your motor runnin' Head out on the highway - Mars Bonfire
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 19:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/02/09 Posts: 1346 Post Likes: +416 Company: Nantucket Rover Repair Location: Manchester, NH (MHT)
Aircraft: Cessna N337JJ
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There are over 650 posts in less than a week about Cirrae on a Beech website. What's up with that? What's 'up' is the useful load on the G5 cirrus which is truly a game-changer. (funny enough, the UL on the NA SR22 is now right where the Pa24 left off 40 years ago )
That seems to be the case with all airplanes, mine has a UL of 1013 a club 1892 A36 has about 1080 UL but is 800 pounds heavier at GW. I will admit it has all the fancy stuff that mine does not.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 19:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3308 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: .....maybe so but the COPA forum is a FAR, FAR cry from the BeechTalk forum.
No matter what airplane I'm flying in a year or ten years from now, I don't think I will ever leave this forum. There is no other I've found which even comes close to the content, experience, usefulness and value of BT. What the Jeffs didn't tell you when you joined is that they limit the number of posts for BT members that don't own a Beechcraft. You're almost to that limit now. You'll either need to create a new account with a fake name, or... ...
Fortunately for me, the Jeffs are somehow able to track all my visits to controller.com where I continuously oogle over the A36s for sale.
No worries here...
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 19:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13627 Post Likes: +7758 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you like the way your old Revell models went together and stayed together you'll enjoy a Cirrus. If one of your models fell a couple of feet it cracked. So will a Cirrus. If you left your model in the hot sun it deteriorated pretty quickly. So will a Cirrus. They are packed with technology and wring a lot of performance out of a fixed gear design. But they are NOT particularly well built nor much fun to fly if that's important to you. They are good enough airplanes for a while. But they are not built to last. Ask a mechanic who works on them what parts need replacing and how often. That said, Cirrus has done more to pump life into GA in the last decade or so than any other builder of certified airplanes and they are to be congratulated, not dissed, for their success. I still don't want one. Robin Wrong. Unsubstantiated. Common misconceptions....but wrong. And what will BT say when Beech announces a composite aircraft?
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 21:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you like the way your old Revell models went together and stayed together you'll enjoy a Cirrus. If one of your models fell a couple of feet it cracked. So will a Cirrus. If you left your model in the hot sun it deteriorated pretty quickly. So will a Cirrus. They are packed with technology and wring a lot of performance out of a fixed gear design. But they are NOT particularly well built nor much fun to fly if that's important to you. They are good enough airplanes for a while. But they are not built to last. Ask a mechanic who works on them what parts need replacing and how often. That said, Cirrus has done more to pump life into GA in the last decade or so than any other builder of certified airplanes and they are to be congratulated, not dissed, for their success. I still don't want one. Robin Wrong. Unsubstantiated. Common misconceptions....but wrong. And what will BT say when Beech announces a composite aircraft? +1
Robin, you're in left field.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 21:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13627 Post Likes: +7758 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I doubt that the rump Beechcraft Corp has the capital to develop a composite 36, even if that were desirable (which it would not be to me). They're in the same boat as Mooney: out of ideas, out of money, almost out of time. How much money did Cirrus have when it was drawn on a napkin? Come up with a marketable/profitable design and the money will show up. Running a company from the bottom line up is for business students. Maybe they should hire some dropouts... http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2013 ... ale-yahoo/
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 21:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/02/08 Posts: 102 Post Likes: +58 Location: Plant City FL
Aircraft: 93 A36
|
|
|
When I picked up my A36 the first flight with passengers was 6 people 3 women, 3 men. That same year I took my wife,father,sister,mother and myself with our luggage from Plant City,FL to Williamsburg Va, for vacation. I leave in the morning to fly myself and 4 passengers with bags to Key West from Clearwater FL, Can I do that in the newest most advanced Cirrus?
I Flew in a cirrus and it flew nice, the Cirrus instructor that I flew with told me of his narrow escape from death when the electronic trim went full nose down in flight and he had to fight it back to the ground. it took months for them to get it back in service.
I admit that I'm a geek I go for the latest and greatest when I see it. But I also know when and how to use technology and when to stay on a more traditional platform.
What I see as our greatest hurdle is useful load. Why do I have to get an older airplane to actually utilize the seats and storage in an airplane. Like the G36, or Piper. and the Cirrus is not even in the game with 5 or 6 people unless they are kids. So in my mind the only advantage for the cirrus is tech, When I show up with 5 passengers with bags or six adults no bags to your 3 or 4 with bags, how did the tech help bring more people and stuff. Michael Chancey N4198S 1975 A36 N5871L Grumman Traveler
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 22:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3308 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Come up with a marketable/profitable design and the money will show up. Hardly.... especially in aviation. Try raising $$ for a new aircraft development program today. Certifying a new airplane from scratch is a formidable task but pales in comparison to the effort required to raise capital for new aircraft development programs.
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 22:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When I picked up my A36 the first flight with passengers was 6 people 3 women, 3 men. That same year I took my wife,father,sister,mother and myself with our luggage from Plant City,FL to Williamsburg Va, for vacation. I leave in the morning to fly myself and 4 passengers with bags to Key West from Clearwater FL, Can I do that in the newest most advanced Cirrus?
I Flew in a cirrus and it flew nice, the Cirrus instructor that I flew with told me of his narrow escape from death when the electronic trim went full nose down in flight and he had to fight it back to the ground. it took months for them to get it back in service.
I admit that I'm a geek I go for the latest and greatest when I see it. But I also know when and how to use technology and when to stay on a more traditional platform.
What I see as our greatest hurdle is useful load. Why do I have to get an older airplane to actually utilize the seats and storage in an airplane. Like the G36, or Piper. and the Cirrus is not even in the game with 5 or 6 people unless they are kids. So in my mind the only advantage for the cirrus is tech, When I show up with 5 passengers with bags or six adults no bags to your 3 or 4 with bags, how did the tech help bring more people and stuff. Michael Chancey N4198S 1975 A36 N5871L Grumman Traveler So Beech is good to go then? No need to for anything new?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 22:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13627 Post Likes: +7758 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Come up with a marketable/profitable design and the money will show up. Hardly.... especially in aviation. Try raising $$ for a new aircraft development program today. Certifying a new airplane from scratch is a formidable task but pales in comparison to the effort required to raise capital for new aircraft development programs. Well then cut your losses, cut the fat, and service the fleet.
If you are not willing to design a new aircraft, you shouldn't be wasting time and money spiraling the drain.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front....... Posted: 22 May 2013, 22:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Rick... They are lost in Wichita. They just don't get it at all. The mere fact that you can spend $100K upgrading a brand new airplane is pathetic. They can produce all the "feel good" videos they want but the G36 is a tired airplane in its present form in my opinion.
I wish I were in charge of the piston line of airplanes at Beech which, by the way, accounted for only $30MM of $891MM total sales of propeller driven aircraft back in 2009 or 2010... about 3%. I would spin it off and give the Bonanza the attention it so rightly deserves, give it the best warranty in its class, and let the consumer tell me what they wanted to buy and not the other way around. They are just old and stodgy over there and their product, the way it is marketed, and the way it is sold confirms that. The airplane and the consumer deserve so much more than that...
Randy, There was a time when Beech airplanes were state of the art. As your post implies that was a long time ago. Once upon a time Beech had the audacity to produce an airplane with NO HORIZONTAL CONTROL SURFACES! Can you believe that? Of course, then, it was run by a strong willed, visionary entrepreneur not a bunch of bureaucratic finance people with no vision or passion. Wait, this description of history reminds me of a current airplane builder(s) the Klapmeier's. As Jesse pointed out, if there was a vision of a better aircraft, there would be the funding to build it. But there isn't (a vision). I think it is a shame but I think Beech has essentially run out the string. They have come out of bankruptcy with a commitment to fewer planes but essentially no new ideas. There is not a product used on the face of the earth that has remained as essentially unchanged as these airplanes for this many decades. That is a testament to the brilliance, intentional and accidental, of the men and women who originally designed it. But even their brilliance didn't build a product that will be acceptable in the market place forever. The Bonanza is a fabulous airplane. Mine is among the best equipped and most capable in existence. But next to the newest generation of Cirrus it is simply old. Trying to sell it in the marketplace, for a much higher price at that, is like trying to sell an 1980 Olds Toronado (and I miss Oldsmobile too) against a modern Lexus. Some may wish to continue to drive a Toronado. But many will want anti lock brakes, all wheel drive, electronic fuel injection, electric locks, windows and seats, etc. You mentioned depreciation. And it is a real concern for any intelligent person. It sounds like you did well with your money. But I assure you that the money you put in your plane isn't there anymore if you tried to sell it today. And every G36 I've seen advertised for sale was significantly lower priced than a new one. Depreciation affects all these planes. That is the quintessential issue when buying new versus used. Used depreciates slower. But it still depreciates.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|