25 Oct 2025, 03:46 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 13 Oct 2024, 17:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16865 Post Likes: +28621 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
|
What an amazing time in history to be alive
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 13 Oct 2024, 18:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/25/12 Posts: 7245 Post Likes: +6497 Location: KCMA - Camarillo, CA
Aircraft: Bonanza G-35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The lack of plumbing on V3 compared to V1 & V2 is insane... The V3 just looks like a finished product to me; simple and elegant. Well said. A beautiful creation.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 13 Oct 2024, 19:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/21/11 Posts: 791 Post Likes: +1024 Location: Northside of Atlanta
Aircraft: RV-6 & RV-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I misidentified the burned through flaps earlier. The worst damage was to the forward flaps. The rear ones took too much heat as well, but the front ones were significantly worse. Moving the forward flaps may address that issue, but the rear are still getting burned up too. Somehow they are going to need to reduce the heat on those surfaces. I'm sure they will solve the problem. Disposable flaps? Different configuration? Different material? Different combination of materials? Different junction fairing?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 14 Oct 2024, 07:55 |
|
|
|
|
Rapid iteration kicks careful planning's ass.
Blue origin has spent billions on what is rapidly becoming irrelevant.
I was there, the sound was awesome!. No recording can do it justince. The video visuals are better than in person, the sound is just not capturable.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 14 Oct 2024, 09:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 6154 Post Likes: +5479 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Rapid iteration kicks careful planning's ass.
Blue origin has spent billions on what is rapidly becoming irrelevant.
I was there, the sound was awesome!. No recording can do it justince. The video visuals are better than in person, the sound is just not capturable. if the sound is more impressive in person, then, that's.......impressive. From the sounds on videos, it sounds like it would just beat at your chest like a rabid drummer.
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 15 Oct 2024, 19:07 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21862 Post Likes: +22498 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was there, the sound was awesome!. No recording can do it justince. What about the sonic boom on reentry? Can you compare it to Falcon 9? Obviously much louder, but I’m wondering how much. Ultimately they’re going to be doing this multiple times er day. Are the neighbors going to have a problem?
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 15 Oct 2024, 19:08 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21862 Post Likes: +22498 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was there, the sound was awesome!. No recording can do it justince. What about the sonic boom on reentry? Can you compare it to Falcon 9? Obviously much louder, but I’m wondering how much. Ultimately they’re going to be doing this multiple times per day. Are the neighbors going to have a problem?
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Spacex Starship OFT Posted: 16 Oct 2024, 08:54 |
|
|
|
>What about the sonic boom on reentry? Can you compare it to Falcon 9? I've not heard a F9 reentry, I have heard a shuttle reentry. The boom was much sharper than the shuttle boom. It was a single sharp boom. The engine noise on both liftoff and landing was much more noticeable. The engine noise was also very different than the shuttle. I got to see the shuttle liftoff from the VIP viewing area on the last night mission. STS-130 in 2010. The constructive/destructive phase change of the shuttle two big solids seemed to make some really strong low frequencies. The 33 raptors on take off had none of that, just a loud crackling roar. I may switch from trying to get good video (I suck at this) to making an attempt at recording hi fidelity audio of a launch. The following is a Twitter exchange about the videography with a friend of mine. (I'm unrocket read the whole thread) https://x.com/unrocket/status/1845965289831518581
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|