banner
banner

03 Jan 2026, 04:27 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 10:41 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 02/20/16
Posts: 428
Post Likes: +554
Aircraft: E55, 7GCAA, Bell 206
Do you have to pull the engine to change a back cylinder on an Aerostar?


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 11:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/13
Posts: 2230
Post Likes: +1529
Company: www.netburner.com
Location: KCRQ
Aircraft: Breeezy, 601P www.netburner.com -->
I've changed a back cylinder without pulling the engine.
Its barely possible.
It might have been easier to pull the engine.

You have to do things like drill out zeus receptacles and flex some sheet metal.
(the rear zeus are now screwed down rather than riveted.)
I did this in a borrowed hanger in Alaska. (long sad story 100% my fault)

I was half way though runup in Bellingham when tower called and said your IFR clearance is available for immediate takeoff, or you can wait 45 minutes, I took off without getting the mixture full rich and cooked a cylinder on the way to PAKW.

Paul


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 12:44 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/18/11
Posts: 323
Post Likes: +296
Company: American Aviation, Inc.
Location: Hayden Lake, ID
Aircraft: C90,340,PA31T,PC-12
Username Protected wrote:
Do you have to pull the engine to change a back cylinder on an Aerostar?


It take about 1.5 hrs. to pull the Aerostar engine and a couple of hrs. to put it back on, so there is no need to work around it. You just pull the 5 bolts holding the engine mount to the firewall, disconnect hoses, wiring and cables and slide it forward. That being said six probe or other special wiring can double the time depending on how they are routed or attached. The good news is that Lycoming cylinders are pretty bullet proof and seldom need changing.

Best regards,
Jim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 13:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/24/14
Posts: 1997
Post Likes: +2784
Username Protected wrote:
That’s a very good point Jim. No free lunch as they say. Having a lot of room is nice but will slow you down or you need more power to move

Doesn't seem to slow down the Piaggio! :stir: :)

_________________
Jay


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 14:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/08/17
Posts: 486
Post Likes: +337
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
Username Protected wrote:
Excellent thread. You guys know so much. Articulate too!

Had a friend once tell me the Aerostar was so small you had to get out to change you mind. Always thought that was hilarious.


I am 6-5 and 225 lb and fit in the Aerostar just fine.

Many Barons and Bonanzas I don’t fit in without pain after 25 minutes. I barely fit in the Duke, but not comfortably. Twin Cessnas are good. Seneca OK. Aztec good. Cheyenne is tight with knees in the way, typical Piper. Can’t fly it well with my shoes on.

My head fits up into the skylite on the Aerostar, and I am right up to the glass up there. When I first flew them I thought it might be an issue in turbulence. The Aerostar does not feel turbulence like everything else due to the airfoil and wing loading. It has never been an issue.

The 58P club with highback seats was about the most claustrophobic experience I have had in a traveling machine. Couldn’t see behind much and couldn’t move much either.

Certainly I would not try to ride in the 5th or 6th seats in the 310 or Baron. The back bench or individual seats in the back of the Aerostar are not a problem because the cabin has the same cross section back there.


Last edited on 01 Jan 2026, 03:07, edited 2 times in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 14:28 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/08/17
Posts: 486
Post Likes: +337
Aircraft: Aerostars, Debonair
Username Protected wrote:
Anyone know the hours required for an Aerostar annual inspection?

I have 42 hrs for a Baron
60 for a 421c
? For an Aerostar


The base labor figure will be in the same ballpark as the the 421.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 15:54 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6674
Post Likes: +5983
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Just saw a guy do an annual on a 601P in 3 days, but they were 2 guys. So it feels like 80hrs+ is probably realistic number to budget for.

_________________
"Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostar vs C-421C
PostPosted: 31 Dec 2025, 22:25 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/07/17
Posts: 648
Post Likes: +1235
Location: Houston, TX
Aircraft: 737,RV8,AEST,B25,C47
Username Protected wrote:
The good news is that Lycoming cylinders are pretty bullet proof and seldom need changing.

Seems about right… we have a low time 1979 600A with 1560 hours on the original engines; looking through the logbooks I see the right engine had one cylinder removed/repaired back in ‘92… and that’s it! No other cylinder work. And it was the #1 cylinder at that. I hope I did just jinx us by mentioning it!


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.