07 May 2025, 01:16 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 11:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 5850 Post Likes: +2627 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It was so obvious they didn’t think they had to write it down. Much like “English is the official language and shall only be used by the government.” What? Why would we write THAT down? People would laugh and ridicule us if we wrote that down.
You mean something like this: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/med ... 60-28B.pdf FAA English Language Standard for an FAA Certificate Issued Under 14 CFR Parts 61, 63, 65, and 107 Date: 6/2/17 AC No: 60-28B Initiated by: AFS-800
…or maybe ICAO’s Aviation English requirement.
Had it not been for the Wright Brothers, we may very well need to speak French when flying internationally. My Francais is so bad the people in France start speaking English to me!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 11:51 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/07/17 Posts: 6976 Post Likes: +5868 Company: Malco Power Design Location: KLVJ
Aircraft: 1976 Baron 58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You mean something like this: https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/med ... 60-28B.pdfFAA English Language Standard for an FAA Certificate Issued Under 14 CFR Parts 61, 63, 65, and 107 Date: 6/2/17 AC No: 60-28B Initiated by: AFS-800 …or maybe ICAO’s Aviation English requirement. Had it not been for the Wright Brothers, we may very well need to speak French when flying internationally. My Francais is so bad the people in France start speaking English to me! It was gonna either be English or German. I’m glad the English side won out for multiple reasons.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 12:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 19947 Post Likes: +25019 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So if someone is convicted of FUI or DUI then you believe return to flying status should be based upon a recommendation by a doctor the pilot chooses who offers an opinion that the pilot is safe to return to flying? Are you saying doctors are going to lie on behalf of the patient? That is, they are not trustworthy to make objective conclusions? That fits with my overall mistrust of the doctors at CAMI, sure enough. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 12:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/02/15 Posts: 3723 Post Likes: +2560 Location: Fresno, CA (KFCH)
Aircraft: T210M
|
|
Username Protected wrote: . if they are found guilty a substance type crime that caused the FAA to be concerned (already muddy waters mixing law with medicine) have them simply go to a real doc who is versed it in, get the docs opinion on, ideally the doctor the airman normally uses, he whips up a letter and that’s that.
So if someone is convicted of FUI or DUI then you believe return to flying status should be based upon a recommendation by a doctor the pilot chooses who offers an opinion that the pilot is safe to return to flying?
Yes, just like BasicMed.
_________________ G5/G3X(10)/G3X(7)/GFC500/GTN750xi/GTN650xi/GTX345 Previous: TBM850/T210M/C182P APS 2004
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 12:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So if someone is convicted of FUI or DUI then you believe return to flying status should be based upon a recommendation by a doctor the pilot chooses who offers an opinion that the pilot is safe to return to flying? So I got to stop you right there, not going to let ya mix the paint colors here, FUI as in flying drunk? Yeahhhhh that’s a straight FAR violation and your medical would be the least of your worries and you’re already going to go for a ride Per the DUI, yup, if a medically licensed doc makes a medical determination and will sign with his license that took him a looong time to get that the airman doesnt have a medical issue that’s that
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 17:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/16/09 Posts: 3141 Post Likes: +2213 Company: Cardinal Flyers Location: Berkeley, CA
Aircraft: Turbo Cardinal RG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: “English is the official language and shall only be used by the government.”
Either that means *only* the government shall use English... or proper English use isn't as common as we suppose? There were plenty of people speaking other languages in the time of the Founding Fathers. After all, the Brits brought along the Hessians as their mercenaries, and they were speaking German... as was George Washington's chief of staff and Inspector General of the Continental Army, good ol' Fred von Steuben, who was responsible for teaching the Continental Army the essentials of military drills, tactics and discipline. Some say we would have never won the revolutionary war without him. Fortunately, Baron von Steuben brought two young men with him from Prussia who quickly learned English and translated for him, as well as sharing his bed. It was perhaps a different time... Paul
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Unelected FAA medical contempt of congress Posted: 20 Aug 2023, 19:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3709 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Either that means *only* the government shall use English... or proper English use isn't as common as we suppose? There were plenty of people speaking other languages in the time of the Founding Fathers. After all, the Brits brought along the Hessians as their mercenaries, and they were speaking German... as was George Washington's chief of staff and Inspector General of the Continental Army, good ol' Fred von Steuben, who was responsible for teaching the Continental Army the essentials of military drills, tactics and discipline. Some say we would have never won the revolutionary war without him. Fortunately, Baron von Steuben brought two young men with him from Prussia who quickly learned English and translated for him, as well as sharing his bed. It was perhaps a different time... Paul
Seems to me when all the founding documents were written in English, it might be a hint lol
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|