banner
banner

05 Jan 2026, 05:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 15:45 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/28/11
Posts: 1379
Post Likes: +602
Aircraft: V35A, B300
Username Protected wrote:
I just flew NYC back to Atlanta VFR at 17.5k' and talked to nobody. Why? Because it's faster.


Jason, you fly more than the average guy. How often is the weather (icing conditions/convective activity) a factor in your cruise altitude choice? In my past experience the mid flight levels is where most of the weather develops that one would like to avoid. I enjoy going up and over it. I realize with your plane there is very little penalty other than fuel flow for going lower. Not so much with the CJ. It's a go high, or don't go far and slow choice.


I think Jason meant he cancelled IFR and went VFR into PDK. Not that he flew the whole way at 17.5

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 15:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

I think Jason meant he cancelled IFR and went VFR into PDK. Not that he flew the whole way at 17.5

I flew the whole way at 17.5


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 15:58 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/28/11
Posts: 1379
Post Likes: +602
Aircraft: V35A, B300
Username Protected wrote:

I think Jason meant he cancelled IFR and went VFR into PDK. Not that he flew the whole way at 17.5

I flew the whole way at 17.5

I’d get your transponder checked. They had you IFR at 26,000

Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 16:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Korny intersection

I fly 17.5 all the time.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 16:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/01/14
Posts: 2301
Post Likes: +2088
Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
Username Protected wrote:

I don't doubt that the SF50 will be flown by pro's (someone other than the owner and paid to do so) but Cirrus's primary market for that aircraft was the existing Cirrus owner.


Anyone flying any airplane, no matter what kind or how many powerplants it may have, should have been trained that only professionals fly airplanes. With this kind of attitude aviation is aviation; 150 or Learjet, Gulfstream or Taylorcraft. An airplane is an airplane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 17:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/23/12
Posts: 2422
Post Likes: +3032
Company: CSRA Document Solutions
Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
Well we are almost at 400 pages.

Mike,
If the Cirrus had 2 engines and flew all the way up to 41,000 feet and was faster than any other jet - you still wouldn't buy one would you?

As much as many of us are stuck in piston think, some are stuck in traditional jet think.

New product, new marketshare, new people coming into GA - I like it.

Peace,
Don


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 17:19 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1784
Post Likes: +1701
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
The best engineered product does not always win.

I like that Cirrus knows their customer base and who they are. Personally I agree with everything Mike has said but in the end of the day what matters is who sells what. I would have never thought Cirrus would be as popular as they are, I personally would not buy one. But it does not matter what I would buy.

Design and emotions drive a lot of what people buy. I have been doing Luxury sales for 25 years and have found that Insecurity is a major driver into why people buy what they buy. Mike C is not looking at this from a insecure place LOL

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 18:36 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/16/10
Posts: 2042
Post Likes: +946
Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
I don't think there is a right or wrong perspective on this thread. It's all about ones perspective. What makes it work for one, not always works for another. Allows differentiation and competition.

I enjoy the different and somewhat opposing view points. Makes for interesting food for thought. Plus it's down right entertaining sometimes

:coffee:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 18:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I’d get your transponder checked. They had you IFR at 26,000

That's not me but good job looking like a weirdo.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 05 Dec 2017, 19:23 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/16/10
Posts: 2042
Post Likes: +946
Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
Username Protected wrote:
I’d get your transponder checked. They had you IFR at 26,000

That's not me but good job looking like a weirdo.


You got stalkers?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2017, 00:51 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20999
Post Likes: +26480
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Cirrus interacts a lot with their customers, and determined that the Vision Jet was the most likely way to get customers to part with their cash. Cirrus buyers didn't ask for Cirrus's take on an Eclipse/Mustang/Phenom 100.

This ultimately comes down to whether or not you think Cirrus buyers are dumb, naive, and uninformed.

The analogy I use is asking a group of bicycle owners what they want to see in a car.

That won't result in the best car.

That's no insult to the bicycle owners, either, they simply don't know what they don't know.

Quote:
Eclipse raised capital and structured their finances using a pro forma that described thousands of orders (you mentioned 2700). Wikipedia says Dayjet was 1400 of those, so half of their order book came from a capital-intensive startup that failed after taking 2% of their projected orders. To me, that's their market.

When Eclipse was founded, Dayjet didn't exist. How did they get started with no market? Your version is bit like revisionist history, and after the fact explanation that didn't really happen. Eclipse was, and always was, a personal jet market. They even wrote white papers on that "new" market.

Quote:
Commercial success isn't how many widgets you produce. It's building the right number of widgets for the right cost, and selling them at the right price to your target market such that you remain in business. Cirrus is on track to smoke Eclipse.

You know that? At this stage of deliveries for Eclipse, there were many to declare Eclipse was going to make it big, too.

The jury is still out, WAY out, on the SF50 being a commercial success. The major issue is exactly the same as Eclipse, an order book where most of them are priced at or below cost. We know at least into the 300s positions, the price is the $1.39M number. I simply don't think Cirrus can make a profit at that number. For one thing, that is only $500-600K more than an SR22 and the parts and labor on an SF50 have to be triple that of an SR22.

Quote:
100% agree that they'd have wider appeal had they built a twin. But they chose to focus on existing Cirrus owners.

There's this belief that had the SF50 been a twin, the Cirrus customer base would have rejected it. I believe that to be hugely false. Cirrus marketing would have seen to that.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2017, 00:54 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14444
Post Likes: +9571
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
The analogy I use is asking a group of bicycle owners what they want to see in a car.

That won't result in the best car.


Might result is a pretty sweet motorcycle though.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2017, 01:07 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20999
Post Likes: +26480
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
If the Cirrus had 2 engines and flew all the way up to 41,000 feet and was faster than any other jet - you still wouldn't buy one would you?

If your point is to try and label all my posts as hate against Cirrus, you are way off base.

If it had been a twin and could go to FL410, I would consider it a vastly superior plane. In essence, an Eclipse done right. Probably not on my shopping list due to range and payload I require, but a FAR better entry airplane that what it is now.

Quote:
New product, new marketshare, new people coming into GA - I like it.

Who are these "new people" who are buying SF50s that were not into GA before? Moving up an SR guy into an SF50 isn't making "new people in GA".

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2017, 01:15 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20999
Post Likes: +26480
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
In almost 4000 hours of flying in the last 10 years I have NEVER used ice protection. Not once.

You either have tremendous schedule flexibility to avoid any cold clouds,

Or your plane has magical properties,

Or you aren't telling the truth.

I can't go 40 hours without some ice encounter, including the summer.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 06 Dec 2017, 02:13 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/11/12
Posts: 2392
Post Likes: +1327
Company: Fractal Rock Solutions, Inc.
Location: Atlanta, GA (KPDK)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
I wonder if we can break Beechtalk at 1000 pages on a thread. My bet is this thread will make it to 999 and beyond.

_________________
====================
202(?) F1 Rocket - build in progress


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.sarasota.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.