30 Jan 2026, 23:35 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 10:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4952 Post Likes: +5635 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Because the stated plan of many citation operators is to buy replacement engines instead of overhauling. That's not common. The most common plan is to fly past TBO and only do HSI. Those two plans are the same. I said instead of overhauling, not instead of an HSI.
Every plane with an owner who flies past TBO and only does an HSI will need overhauls someday. That time will come, and you can’t hide from it forever. If Mr. Tarver still has a used engine in his container, you’re in great shape. But if you’re the guy who doesn’t have engines available when the music stops, you have a plane with no reasonable economic path forward.
I predict that for the large majority of planes with owners who are running engines past TBO, that time will be 30 years or less from now. For many owners who might buy now (including me) that is likely past the expiration date of our own personal flying career. That doesn’t mean that the possibility that the date comes sooner should be ignored.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 10:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3837 Post Likes: +5702 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’m headed to alpha, and ATC says, “after Bravo, cleared Direct Foxtrot.” I've literally never had that come up. I get "direct to Foxtrot" after I reach or pass Bravo. I've never had a future segment of a route changed on me. Mike C.
I have had that a couple times in the last couple of weeks. After XYZ waypoint cleared to ABC. Never really thought it was a big deal, but I am not interested in deleting waypoints, just in case. I just write it down on my board. It is very similar to after XYZ waypoint depart heading 320 or whatever. I don't even consider tasking my FMS with that memory item. Although you can with an obs radial. That is too far into the magenta line for me. I fly all 4 corners of the US, and each corner has its own unique flavor. SoCal is the hardest for me. For some crazy reason they love to mix GPS waypoints and VOR radials. I am like pick one please. The middle part of the country..... GPS direct every time
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 11:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/01/12 Posts: 513 Post Likes: +409 Company: Minnesota Flight
Aircraft: M20M,PA28,PA18,CE500
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mike somewhere around 17:27z on 133.32. N581QS. So listen for execjet581. I believe it was after ELItE go direct BUGGZ. We were still a ways from ELITE. GRINCH 5 arrival. You are going to have be more specific. What day? What ATC facility? LiveATC doesn't do frequencies, they do ATC sectors. From what you said, GRNCH5, you are before ELITE, and they said "reaching ELITE go direct BUGGZ", correct? And then AFTER that, they put you back on the arrival at MAYYR, COAXE, GRTNG, or GRNCH, yes? That is, you would have to reload those waypoints if you deleted them for ELITE direct BUGGZ. if they didn't put you back on the arrival, no issue, waypoints deleted, and you didn't need them. If they did put me back on the arrival, that would be trivial for me. Flight plan, select the arrival, reload it, select waypoint, either direct or activate leg depending whether they said direct or join. No waypoint typing at all, just reload the entire procedure. If you have any concerns for a full route clearance, type it all in, save it, now you can reload it just like the arrival. Mike C.
Hey, was just trying to help. You asked for when and where. How that clearance goes down. It was yesterday. Just got same type thing today but Enroute. Point is it is Vey common.. surprised you have never got something like it. Today we were 30 miles from the next point before we were then supposed to go direct after passing. Honestly you do you. I bet you tell your sim instructors how the session will go and how you are going to do things. Stick to the mechanics and log research. You DO do that quite well. And I bet you ARE a safe pilot. But some things could possibly be even better if you open your mind just a little.
And the compliments were not in green. Sincere.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 11:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21194 Post Likes: +26679 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Those two plans are the same. Doing a hot section on your own engine doesn't require any market availability of used engines. Buying used engines obviously does. Very dig difference. Quote: Every plane with an owner who flies past TBO and only does an HSI will need overhauls someday. In theory, yes, but you get a lot of good hours for low cost this way. There is also the chance, maybe, that someone comes along with a lower cost jet engine retrofit. If there are a lot of legacy Citations out there, maybe the market pull will be enough to see that happen. At one time, I was hoping Honda might do something like that. In any case, my current rate of flying gets me 15+ years of flying before my next HSI times out. At that time, my engine will still be in reasonable shape for an overhaul (parts have enough cycle life left for a full TBO period). That would be 5700 hours of flying for about $500K (one OH, two HSI), or $88 an hour per engine, which is quite decent. That's half the cost of the Williams program, for example. Whether legacy Citations get overhauled or scrapped will be a market decision. If, like the present day, they are in demand and replacement options are very expensive, they will get overhauled and keep flying. If they are worth very little and people can buy other things that do the same job for less money, then they won't. Either way, I'm okay. In the first case, my plane is worth overhauling since I will get back much of that in market value. In the second case, I will be able to buy a lot of spare parts to lower my operating cost due to ample supply of retiring airframes. Thus I am in good shape no matter which way the market turns. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 11:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21194 Post Likes: +26679 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have had that a couple times in the last couple of weeks. After XYZ waypoint cleared to ABC. I do get that regularly, what I don't get is the go backwards on the flight plan after the change. That I have never had. Quote: It is very similar to after XYZ waypoint depart heading 320 or whatever. Exactly, there are a lot of things that can change at any waypoint. Speed, altitudes, heading, etc. I'm always keeping n mind my next waypoint and my time to fix, plus any changes that need to be done at that waypoint. I'm having a hard time imagining not being aware of the next waypoint and relying on my flight plan to save me. In any case, on, off, and back on an arrival is trivial with the GTN, just reload it. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 11:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/24/18 Posts: 736 Post Likes: +359 Location: NYC
Aircraft: ISP Eagle II SR22 g2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In climb/cruise/descent, I tend to write down frequencies given, altitudes, headings - then read back to ATC what I wrote down. Then I'll twiddle knobs and push buttons based on what I wrote down, double check that what's displayed matches what I wrote, then put a check next to what I wrote down signifying I have crossed checked these things. I've develop a "direct to box" approach for much of this. If ATC says "contact..." I reach over and hit the standby frequency box, and then dial in the numbers as they speak them to me. Then I read back what I typed in. Pause briefly, then hit "XFER" to put it directly into active. This is faster than finding paper and pen and more accurate since you avoid a two step transfer (ATC to paper to box). You avoid that "is that a 1 or a 7 I wrote down?" confusion, too. It is always just one touch to get to the frequency entry box on the GTN, so I find I am fast enough to do this without getting behind. I do the same for a heading, I have dedicated knobs for that with my GCU 485, I dial it in, and read back what I dialed. Same for altitude. This direct to box approach saves time over any two step process. The direct to box approach does not work for a GNS 430/530. The "twist knob" method of entry is too slow. It works for a GTN since it is a direct numerical keypad. The responsiveness of the GTN also helps (I have the Xi versions which may be better in this regard). Quote: However, if deep in an arrival in busy airspace and getting shotgun headings/altitudes/etc, I won't write anything down. That is exactly when you need to be most accurate and your brain is most likely to forget. I try to do the direct to box approach every time and try to rely on my short term memory as little as possible. Mike C.
I use the direct to box method in the GTN in the Citation as well as in the Gns430 in the Cirrus. It works great either way.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 11:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/01/12 Posts: 513 Post Likes: +409 Company: Minnesota Flight
Aircraft: M20M,PA28,PA18,CE500
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have had that a couple times in the last couple of weeks. After XYZ waypoint cleared to ABC. I do get that regularly, what I don't get is the go backwards on the flight plan after the change. That I have never had. Quote: It is very similar to after XYZ waypoint depart heading 320 or whatever. Exactly, there are a lot of things that can change at any waypoint. Speed, altitudes, heading, etc. I'm always keeping n mind my next waypoint and my time to fix, plus any changes that need to be done at that waypoint. I'm having a hard time imagining not being aware of the next waypoint and relying on my flight plan to save me. In any case, on, off, and back on an arrival is trivial with the GTN, just reload it. Mike C.
Back on previous route is not as common. But it does happen. Usually out West with Mil air space going hot and cold. I like to rely on paying attention and just remembering to do things when it should be done. It’s the best way. That’s why I never use checklists SOPs
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 13:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1751 Post Likes: +1808 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I fly all 4 corners of the US, and each corner has its own unique flavor. SoCal is the hardest for me. For some crazy reason they love to mix GPS waypoints and VOR radials. I am like pick one please. The middle part of the country..... GPS direct every time  FYI, Memphis Approach likes to do this. I fly into KAWM (Inside the MEM Bravo) every year for my 61.58. As part of the clearance they give you an "enter controlled airspace on XXX heading" but then once you contact Approach they will give you a "fly XXX heading to intercept MEM radial XXX." Caused me a scramble the first time as I wasn't ready. Now I have the MEM VOR loaded ahead of time. So SoCal isn't the only one that likes to do this 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 13:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/07/19 Posts: 503 Post Likes: +1082
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mr. Fence Post meet Mike, Mike meet Fence Post. Y’all call me when you’re done. You used to be that fencepost. You sound jilted. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 13:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 6376 Post Likes: +5762 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mr. Fence Post meet Mike, Mike meet Fence Post. Y’all call me when you’re done. You used to be that fencepost. You sound jilted. 
What do you mean "used" to be??? He still is a main whipping.......errrrrr.......fence post.....
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 16:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4952 Post Likes: +5635 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Those two plans are the same. Doing a hot section on your own engine doesn't require any market availability of used engines. Buying used engines obviously does. Very dig difference. Overhauls, Mike, overhauls. Not hot sections.
Quote: There is also the chance, maybe, that someone comes along with a lower cost jet engine retrofit. If there are a lot of legacy Citations out there, maybe the market pull will be enough to see that happen. At one time, I was hoping Honda might do something like that. Hope all you want. It wasn’t economic before when owners were buying $2M 560s and it’s not getting better when owners buy $700k 560s. Who’s going to do it? The fleet can’t even get autopilot upgrades, let alone engine upgrades.
Quote: I will be able to buy a lot of spare parts to lower my operating cost due to ample supply of retiring airframes. Thus I am in good shape no matter which way the market turns.
Mike C. Will you have a good supply of ailerons? Yep, buy as many as you want. They don’t wear out. How about moving parts that get stressed? Nope, those are the ones that are in short supply. If the turbo encabulator is worn out on your 55 year old plane, it’s worn out on everyone else’s 55 year old plane. Matter of fact, the plane in the boneyard is there because the turbo encabulator wore out and replacements can’t be found.
You absolutely get a lot of hours for low cost, but the airframe is likely to be near worthless at the end. On the plus side, you don’t have to worry about depreciation recapture.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 17:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/27/13 Posts: 779 Post Likes: +588 Location: KABQ KANE KPTK and beyond
Aircraft: EA50, C25M, C25C
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Set a timer. There are many work arounds to the missing “next waypoint” feature. It’s still a feature that’s desirable and useful when you regularly run into these situations.
_________________ Brent
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 16 Nov 2023, 22:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/27/13 Posts: 779 Post Likes: +588 Location: KABQ KANE KPTK and beyond
Aircraft: EA50, C25M, C25C
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As part of the clearance they give you an "enter controlled airspace on XXX heading" but then once you contact Approach they will give you a "fly XXX heading to intercept MEM radial XXX." ATC there has the Elvis4 permanently plastered to their screen, and assumes you do too. 
_________________ Brent
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|