14 Jan 2026, 14:28 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 11:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You think There are some absolutes. New planes never go down in price. Few make money on low price points in aviation. The laws of aerodynamics and gravity continue to hold fast.  Yes, I think you're assuming way too much. The next closest competitor is over $4MM... more than 2X the cost of an SF50. So even if the SF50 went up in price it's still cheaper. Also...... a new SR22T is almost $1MM. You don't know what the price of the SF50 will be in a few years. No, it won't go down... It will go up... but so will all of the competition. In 2008 a PC12NG was $3.2MM. Now a PC12 NG is $4.9MM. Same airplane.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3805 Post Likes: +5640 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You think There are some absolutes. New planes never go down in price. Few make money on low price points in aviation. The laws of aerodynamics and gravity continue to hold fast.  Yes, I think you're assuming way too much. The next closest competitor is over $4MM... more than 2X the cost of an SF50. So even if the SF50 went up in price it's still cheaper. Also...... a new SR22T is almost $1MM. You don't know what the price of the SF50 will be in a few years. No, it won't go down... It will go up... but so will all of the competition. In 2008 a PC12NG was $3.2MM. Now a PC12 NG is $4.9MM. Same airplane.
The M500 and M600 are direct competitors, the M500 is 1.99 base, the M600 has a 2.89 base. Of course more with options, although some of the options on the SF50 like radar, are standard on the M-class. The Epic if it comes to market, also looks very competitive. If promises hold, will fly faster, higher and farther. But back to my point. You can't get one right now, if you are not a position holder, so there is no retail market.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:05 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14448 Post Likes: +9573 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The next closest competitor is over $4MM... more than 2X the cost of an SF50. So even if the SF50 went up in price it's still cheaper. I don't think 4m planes are competitors. If someone is willing to spend 4m on a plane they won't pick the SF50. The competition is a Meridian M500, and maybe M600... and people who might otherwise pick a new SR22.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The M500 and M600 are direct competitors, the M500 is 1.99 base, the M600 has a 2.89 base. Of course more with options, although some of the options on the SF50 like radar, are standard on the M-class. The Epic if it comes to market, also looks very competitive. If promises hold, will fly faster, higher and farther. But back to my point. You can't get one right now, if you are not a position holder, so there is no retail market. So M500 and M600 are in the same ballpark and probably in most cases more money. Don't quote the vaporware Epic. You have no idea what it will cost or if it will ever even get to market.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3805 Post Likes: +5640 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The next closest competitor is over $4MM... more than 2X the cost of an SF50. So even if the SF50 went up in price it's still cheaper. I don't think 4m planes are competitors. If someone is willing to spend 4m on a plane they won't pick the SF50. The competition is a Meridian M500, and maybe M600... and people who might otherwise pick a new SR22.
That is probably true, although I heard someone say once what the average net worth of the average Cirrus buyer was, won't repeat it, because it is inflammatory . Sounds like the average person flying a new Cirrus could probably fly almost any single pilot plane that they want.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think 4m planes are competitors. I never said they were "competitors". I said.... "want a better airplane than the SF50? Pay more money and go buy one"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3805 Post Likes: +5640 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The M500 and M600 are direct competitors, the M500 is 1.99 base, the M600 has a 2.89 base. Of course more with options, although some of the options on the SF50 like radar, are standard on the M-class. The Epic if it comes to market, also looks very competitive. If promises hold, will fly faster, higher and farther. But back to my point. You can't get one right now, if you are not a position holder, so there is no retail market. So M500 and M600 are in the same ballpark and probably in most cases more money. Don't quote the vaporware Epic. You have no idea what it will cost or if it will ever even get to market.
Yeah, but you can get an M500 and an M600 today... Well production is max'd out, so you would have to put in an order, but would definitely get one before you could get an SF50.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yeah, but you can get an M500 and an M600 today... Well production is max'd out, so you would have to put in an order, but would definitely get one before you could get an SF50. You're not making a point right now and you're attempting to change the subject. We're not discussing lead times. We're comparing prices of CURRENTLY CERTIFIED airplanes that a person can order.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3805 Post Likes: +5640 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think 4m planes are competitors. I never said they were "competitors". I said.... "want a better airplane than the SF50? Pay more money and go buy one"
I think we see Jason in an SF50 pretty soon. Going to have to make 3 stops on the way to Aspen with winter winds and that plane load of friends though.
Yeah, we are all saying the same thing. The SF50 sits nicely in the 2 mil price range, although, I am quite sure we never see a retail SF50 at 2 or even 2.2 mil. At least not one that we would consider suitable for flight level flying like radar, TCAS and TAWS-B, which are listed as options.
I was just looking at the brochure again. Sure is exciting to look at. I bet a hoot to fly. I am just now at a place in my life that mission capability and practicality seem more important.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:23 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am quite sure we never see a retail SF50 at 2 or even 2.2 mil. Doesn't matter. Even at $3.2MM it's competitive I'm not an SF50 buyer. But I do believe the SF50 is going to effect the entire single pilot market.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3805 Post Likes: +5640 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I am quite sure we never see a retail SF50 at 2 or even 2.2 mil. Doesn't matter. Even at $3.2MM it's competitive I'm not an SF50 buyer. But I do believe the SF50 is going to effect the entire single pilot market.
I think so as well. Even if they only sell 300 of them, that brings a lot of new turbine pilots into the fold.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [ I think so as well. Even if they only sell 300 of them, that brings a lot of new turbine pilots into the fold. This contradicts what you wrote previously.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3805 Post Likes: +5640 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [ I think so as well. Even if they only sell 300 of them, that brings a lot of new turbine pilots into the fold. This contradicts what you wrote previously.
How so?
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 02 Oct 2017, 12:31 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14448 Post Likes: +9573 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I never said they were "competitors".
Ha.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|