banner
banner

08 Jan 2026, 21:05 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 14:33 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 241
Post Likes: +511
Summation of 358 pages on the Cirrus SF50:

1) Some members love the aircraft, hopes it succeeds.
2) Some members hate the aircraft, hopes it fails.
3) Lots of speculation, baseless opinions and tons of rhetoric.
4) Some members have little interest, knowing they'll never be able to afford one, but "tune in" here to see any new information and/or developments on the aircraft.

The number of pages would be reduced by a sizable number if a few members either PM'ed each other or just fought to the death in a cage match. Either way.....a more concise, informative discussion would occur. :cheers:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 14:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20417
Post Likes: +25585
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Username Protected wrote:
Summation of 358 pages on the Cirrus SF50:

1) Some members love the aircraft, hopes it succeeds.
2) Some members hate the aircraft, hopes it fails.
3) Lots of speculation, baseless opinions and tons of rhetoric.
4) Some members have little interest, knowing they'll never be able to afford one, but "tune in" here to see any new information and/or developments on the aircraft.

The number of pages would be reduced by a sizable number if a few members either PM'ed each other or just fought to the death in a cage match. Either way.....a more concise, informative discussion would occur. :cheers:

And, in November, this thread will be 3 years old....and going strong! :bugeye:

Sad to say that I've read every post on all 359 pages! :crazy:

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 14:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12201
Post Likes: +3086
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Summation of 358 pages on the Cirrus SF50:

1) Some members love the aircraft, hopes it succeeds.
2) Some members hate the aircraft, hopes it fails.
3) Lots of speculation, baseless opinions and tons of rhetoric.
4) Some members have little interest, knowing they'll never be able to afford one, but "tune in" here to see any new information and/or developments on the aircraft.

The number of pages would be reduced by a sizable number if a few members either PM'ed each other or just fought to the death in a cage match. Either way.....a more concise, informative discussion would occur. :cheers:


Nah you missed at least one other group. I think the plane super stupid; but will sell like hot cakes and succeed.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 15:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12201
Post Likes: +3086
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
And, in November, this thread will be 3 years old....and going strong! :bugeye:

Sad to say that I've read every post on all 359 pages! :crazy:


If we do one word per post, can we get to 360? You can then skip a page. I promise, nothing new will be stated.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 15:37 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/13/09
Posts: 1124
Post Likes: +885
Location: Boise, Idaho
Aircraft: Bonanza A35
Username Protected wrote:
. Either way.....a more concise, informative discussion would occur. :cheers:


Yes, true, but would it be as entertaining?

_________________
Frank Stutzman
'49 A35 Bonanza ("the Hula Girl")
Boise, ID


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 16:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5248
Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
Username Protected wrote:
Summation of 358 pages on the Cirrus SF50:

1) Some members love the aircraft, hopes it succeeds.
2) Some members hate the aircraft, hopes it fails.
3) Lots of speculation, baseless opinions and tons of rhetoric.
4) Some members have little interest, knowing they'll never be able to afford one, but "tune in" here to see any new information and/or developments on the aircraft.

The number of pages would be reduced by a sizable number if a few members either PM'ed each other or just fought to the death in a cage match. Either way.....a more concise, informative discussion would occur. :cheers:


I think this summary first came up on about page 10....

_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 19:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
There's one more category, which I put myself in.

5) Doesn't like the plane (I don't hate it, just don't like it), but hopes it will succeed.

I hope the SF50 is successful. It will help the light jet market overall.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 22:02 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21007
Post Likes: +26481
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
It will help the light jet market overall.

Very much so, it is a gateway drug that will make its owners want a real jet in short order.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 22:22 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21007
Post Likes: +26481
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
You are making the assumption they lose money at 1.39 Million.

It is a fairly solid assumption.

They raised the price a lot. You don't do that if you have margin, you'd rather build a larger order book and build more of them. After they raised the price, sales crawled.

Then there is the basic math of adding up the parts. FJ33-5A OEM cost is around $800K. The Garmin package is around $200K. Start adding up all the costs for the bill of materials, wheels, brakes, pumps, environmental, etc, and you soon run out of margin before you even bolt them together. You also have to include liability, labor, overhead, etc.

The odds Cirrus is making a profit at $1.39M is very low, and if they are, it is microscopic. It will be a challenge to break even as they make at least 350 of the units at the low price point.

Quote:
The point is you do not know. So unless you have access to the financial reports, you just have speculation.

It doesn't take a genius to estimate what the parts cost and to see that making a profit is challenging.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 23:17 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 8236
Post Likes: +7971
Location: New York, NY
Aircraft: Debonair C33A
Username Protected wrote:
$1,350/hr.

Where's all the money you are supposed to be saving with having only one engine?

You can fly a real jet for that much, especially when you consider the cost per mile.


Can you RENT one for that price? $1,350 isn't the operating cost, it's the price that outfit rents you SF-50 for one-hour "Cirrus experience". I am sure they are making a healthy profit on that.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 23:32 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8837
Post Likes: +11442
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
I'm with Yuri, that doesn't sound like operating cost... that's more than a CJ1... I'd have to look... probably more than a CJ2.

_________________
I have the right to remain silent, I just seem to lack the ability.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 23:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12201
Post Likes: +3086
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Mike C,

You are making a lot of assumptions there. Starting with the engine price.
Consider, Cirrus has a 600 plane backlog, that is a rather large volume order to negotiate discounts.
So unless you can produce financials, or contracts all we have is speculation. As much as some people here make fun of the current owners, they do have a stereotype of being good in math. As such, if there was no hope of making a return like you postulate, they likely would never have approved the project to start. These basic details were known years ago, before Cirrus was even acquired.

As for profit margin, I laugh at your statement about raising it. I dealt with a database vendor who purchased another company. Minimal to no new development going on, and the product was to phased out over the next few releases. A federal agency decided it was the new standard, the following year the database price more than tripled with almost no new features.

More then one company charges exactly what the market will bear, only engineers try and match production costs to product price. Sales/business people find ways to change the rules to cover the costs or raise it to make as much as the market will stand.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 23:49 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 8236
Post Likes: +7971
Location: New York, NY
Aircraft: Debonair C33A
Username Protected wrote:
The odds Cirrus is making a profit at $1.39M is very low, and if they are, it is microscopic. It will be a challenge to break even as they make at least 350 of the units at the low price point.


Right, they are not going to be making a profit at $1.39M, but they won't be losing much money either. The jump to $2M+ is what will allow them to recoup the development costs and make a profit. That will have to wait for a couple of years, but they can afford it with all the free money Chinese pumped into Cirrus.

This isn't the Eclipse situation of being at the mercy of venture capitalist investors. They are are basically owned by Chinese government.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 21 Sep 2017, 23:59 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21007
Post Likes: +26481
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Right, they are not going to be making a profit at $1.39M, but they won't be losing much money either.

So if everything goes just right, they will make ~400 airplanes over the next 3 years and only lose a little money on production, never mind development costs.

Sounds like an aviation business plan to me.

Quote:
The jump to $2M+ is what will allow them to recoup the development costs and make a profit.

If anybody buys at that price. The order book length basically froze with the price increase.

Quote:
This isn't the Eclipse situation of being at the mercy of venture capitalist investors.

Eclipse spent nearly $6M per airplane and sold most of them at around $1.3M. Why do you think the VCs caused their problems? It was vendors who refused to ship any more product without payment. Duh.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 22 Sep 2017, 00:17 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 8236
Post Likes: +7971
Location: New York, NY
Aircraft: Debonair C33A
Username Protected wrote:
Eclipse spent nearly $6M per airplane and sold most of them at around $1.3M. Why do you think the VCs caused their problems? It was vendors who refused to ship any more product without payment. Duh.


VCs caused the problem because they didn't give them more money to pay the vendors. ;)

Chinese is a different story. They have unlimited funds, they are a patient bunch, and the profit isn't a primary motivator for them in this case.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.sarasota.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.