29 Jan 2026, 16:41 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50  Posted: 06 Jun 2017, 21:34 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16157
Post Likes: +8879
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That's a great venue to place a fluff-piece like this.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Jun 2017, 18:11 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 04/06/14
Posts: 983
Post Likes: +606
Location: Everywhere
Aircraft: TP/Jet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I guy I know who is "in the know" told me Cirrus has delivered 40 SF50's now. I still only see 12 registered in the FAA DB - although it probably isn't super current.
_________________
tREX terSteeg, aka PEE-TAH, aka :deadhorse:, Mr 007
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 12 Jun 2017, 12:07 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8873
Post Likes: +11624
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I guy I know who is "in the know" told me Cirrus has delivered 40 SF50's now. I still only see 12 registered in the FAA DB - although it probably isn't super current.
Yes, the FAA runs way behind. Has for the last several years. I'll check JetNet.
_________________
Be kind. You never know what someone is going through.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 12 Jun 2017, 12:21 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 02/10/12
Posts: 6712
Post Likes: +8239
Company: Minister of Pith
Location: Florida
Aircraft: Piper PA28/140
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Another puff piece, but I think it is written better. http://gizmodo.com/why-did-this-company ... 1795892742Tim Cirrus obviously knows where the folks who can spend 3mil on a plane hang out. And it's not the golf-course.
Great to see that Cirrus and the press are doing everything possible to dispel the myth that GA is only for the filthy rich.
_________________
"No comment until the time limit is up."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Jun 2017, 20:47 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8873
Post Likes: +11624
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Another puff piece, but I think it is written better. http://gizmodo.com/why-did-this-company ... 1795892742Tim Read most of the article... meh... I'm curious about the $20M Learjet they are referring to?  Can't believe everything you read on the internet!
_________________
Be kind. You never know what someone is going through.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 15 Jun 2017, 10:14 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 09/11/09
Posts: 6371
Post Likes: +5752
Company: Middle of the country company
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm curious about the $20M Learjet they are referring to? Can't believe everything you read on the internet!  He must have meant "Bombardier" in general????
_________________
Three things tell the truth:
Little kids
Drunks
Yoga pants
Actually, four things.....
Cycling kit..
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Jun 2017, 17:51 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: 08/26/16
Posts: 8
Post Likes: +20
|
|
|
Just read in latest issue of Flying magazine, the max demonstrated x-wind for the Vision jet is 16kts. Does that surprise anyone? I realize this is not a limitation. But it seems low to me. TBM is 20kts and Cessna TTx is 23 kts. Just curious.
Thanks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 17 Jun 2017, 18:01 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12206
Post Likes: +3089
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Just read in latest issue of Flying magazine, the max demonstrated x-wind for the Vision jet is 16kts. Does that surprise anyone? I realize this is not a limitation. But it seems low to me. TBM is 20kts and Cessna TTx is 23 kts. Just curious.
Thanks Crosswind number is a regulatory based on stall speed. You will almost never find a manufacturer put in a demonstrated speed which is higher then the regulatory requirement. Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|
