banner
banner

13 Nov 2025, 18:00 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 842 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 57  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:02 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13186
Post Likes: +21109
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
Agreed. Not an option. The current airframes are great.


The airframes are great, but when you add TAT, SVT and TKS from the factory to equal a Cirrus, the price tag is going to be over $1 Million and NO ONE is going to buy one.

Beech is in a Catch 22, $40 Million to certify a new design and a $1 Million price tag to compete with Cirrus.

This looks like a real bad road ahead, regardless of how many Management and/or Sales people you fire.

It still takes them 6,000 man hours to build one.


Or.. They could offer a Bonanza kit... :duck:
_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:03 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/14/09
Posts: 6068
Post Likes: +3329
Company: tomdrew.lawyer
Location: Des Moines, IA (KDSM)
Aircraft: 1973 Baron E55
Good idea. Owner assist? :shrug:

_________________
C340A/8KCAB/T182T
F33C/E55/B58
PA 28/32
Currency 12 M: IPC/BFR, CFII Renewal


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 7709
Post Likes: +5102
Company: Inscrutable Fasteners, LLC
Location: West Palm Beach - F45
Aircraft: Planeless
If I were Beech, I'd wait to see if there is any meaningful reform to Part 23 before I did anything.

That said, Brands B, C and P have been building the same airplanes for nearly 60 years. The design work and tooling is fully depreciated. The materials and techniques are understood to the point of exhaustion.

Yet it still costs $1000 for a part that was made for a 1965 GM, which costs $25 to make.

No one wants to look at the elephant in the room. If it costs you 800 large to build a SLIGHTLY different version of the same airplane you've been making forever, then there is a serious, fundamental problem with the business you're in.

Best,
Rich


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:15 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13186
Post Likes: +21109
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
Good idea. Owner assist? :shrug:


Bingo. Set up a joint program with CMI to build your own engine (like superior). Further establish a program that allows you to get the quals/test for an A&P. Then partner with ABS to establish a training regime like Cirrus.

_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:18 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 9024
Post Likes: +16218
Location: Palos Verdes, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
If I were Beech, I'd wait to see if there is any meaningful reform to Part 23 before I did anything.

Best,
Rich

THAT.

What if Beech re-introduced a V-tail with TN550, FIKI, that had state-of-the-art avionics? Would that compete with a Cirrus? It sure would be a head-turner when sitting next to a Cirrus on the ramp!

(And this is coming from an A36 driver!)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:23 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/30/11
Posts: 4278
Post Likes: +3119
Location: Greenwood, MO
Username Protected wrote:
I don't want a project plane. I know some of you do but I have better things to do with my life than spend a year building an airplane. I don't want to do it. Can you understand that most folks don't want to take this on?
Jason, if you were in the market for your G36 today, how much would you be willing to pay for a 10-year-old A36, upgraded by a third party to be as comparable as possible to your G36, like new inside and out, and ready right now? Airframe is under 1000 hours and the Powermasters TN550 is zero-time. It's either that at $XXX,000 or whatever you would have in a new one plus upgrades. Knowing what you know now, what's that plane (and your time) worth?

I understand there are tax benefits for buying new, but I don't really know how much that impacts the bottom line. You've basically described the factory warranty as worthless, and I know you have an analytical mind. I just wonder if there's a market for this kind of aftermarket reman. I would think someone would already have a supply ready to go. :scratch:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/08
Posts: 10019
Post Likes: +2491
Location: Arizona (KSEZ)
Garmin knows where the money is! It's not in installing 100 G2000/year in new planes that cannot be updated because they are certified by the manufacturer. It's installing Garmin equipment in 1000's of the existing airframes!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:40 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8726
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
oops missed a digit. Yep 210 which is still 197 more people than bought a G36 last year or quoted another way 15 years of G36 sales at the current sales rate. :bugeye:



To be fair, Beechcraft was selling 80-90 Bonanzas a year up thru 2008 when the economy and HBC hit the fan.


Chris,

Cirrus wasnt saddled with Hawker and a ton of debt like Beech was but they are still selling 300 planes a year...

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:49 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8726
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
If you don't like Beechcraft, what are you here wasting our time? If you have something useful to suggest, everyone is all ears. But just to boil the ocean and throw around stupid suggestions, please stop wasting our time.

The Jeff's, need to create some category like they have for politics, call it beech bashing or suggestion box, or something other than being categorized under panel forum. I want to see the panel forum and the only way to get this out of the list is to ignore the entire forum.


John,

I presume you will not read this because by now surely you have found the ignore button. But I don't think anyone participating in this discussion dislikes Beech. To the contrary. I know Jason is a big fan of his former plane for example. I certainly am of mine. But affection, and frankly, loyalty doesn't blind me to obvious shortcomings. It also does not blind me to the very obvious fine qualities of other aircraft.

You can see the rest of Panel Talk with viewing this thread. By your post count I see that you should have enough experience to figure that out. No one here is wasting your time. Don't participate if wish. But also please don't try to tell the rest of us what to think or say.

I don't know who you were referring to in your post. I also don't care. I didn't like the insulting tone which I think very clearly violates the norms or our little Internet community.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:54 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5834
Post Likes: +7285
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
As a potential buyer very soon, I think everyone is missing a very important fact. The new G36TC will not even carry 4 adults and baggage with full fuel, and its not pressurized. It's not even on my radar. If I'm spending over $1million ( and it will be) , its going to have at least 800lbs. Payload with full fuel and be pressurized.

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I don't want a project plane. I know some of you do but I have better things to do with my life than spend a year building an airplane. I don't want to do it. Can you understand that most folks don't want to take this on?
Jason, if you were in the market for your G36 today, how much would you be willing to pay for a 10-year-old A36, upgraded by a third party to be as comparable as possible to your G36, like new inside and out, and ready right now? Airframe is under 1000 hours and the Powermasters TN550 is zero-time. It's either that at $XXX,000 or whatever you would have in a new one plus upgrades. Knowing what you know now, what's that plane (and your time) worth?

I understand there are tax benefits for buying new, but I don't really know how much that impacts the bottom line. You've basically described the factory warranty as worthless, and I know you have an analytical mind. I just wonder if there's a market for this kind of aftermarket reman. I would think someone would already have a supply ready to go. :scratch:

Without a GFC700, it's not comparable.

If you could do a turn key KA with blackhawk and G1000 sort of thing then yes, I'd be interested. But G1000 is not available for older 36's

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 21:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
As a potential buyer very soon, I think everyone is missing a very important fact. The new G36TC will not even carry 4 adults and baggage with full fuel, and its not pressurized. It's not even on my radar. If I'm spending over $1million ( and it will be) , its going to have at least 800lbs. Payload with full fuel and be pressurized.

Whatcha gonna buy then?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 22:01 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8726
Post Likes: +9456
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Hey guys,

In an earlier post I made a crack about flying a G5 today if the tornadoes permitted. We took off before the rain and flew for an hour and a half. After landing we discovered all hell had broken loose here. Sadly, it looks like thousands are homeless and dozens dead in the terrible storms this afternoon.

I had planned to give you an extensive Pirep on the G5 but frankly my excitement at flying a truly amazing aircraft is deeply dampened by the tragic loose of life. I am just thankful that it looks like our 5 agencies in the affected area, and employees, are all safe. They will be very busy in the coming days.

It reminds me that what we passionately debate here really does not matter that much and that we need to put our trivial disagreements into the proper context.

I will say, about the G5, that it is truly amazing. I flew it, by hand, through the entire envelope. In fact I was a little queasy toward the end. We did all I could think of and tested every system (except CAPS). It is all that Jason said and a lot more in my opinion. I encourage all of you, even those who will NEVER fly anything but a Beech until they pry your Medical from your cold lifeless fingers, to go try it. If for no other reason than the sheer aviating fun of it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 22:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/02/10
Posts: 7709
Post Likes: +5102
Company: Inscrutable Fasteners, LLC
Location: West Palm Beach - F45
Aircraft: Planeless
Username Protected wrote:
Garmin knows where the money is! It's not in installing 100 G2000/year in new planes that cannot be updated because they are certified by the manufacturer. It's installing Garmin equipment in 1000's of the existing airframes!


Not to mention G3X units/autopilots in experimentals.

Take a look at what a two screen G3X system costs WITH autopilot. Oh, yea, that includes full engine instrumentation as well.

Best,
Rich


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus is so far out in front.......
PostPosted: 20 May 2013, 22:17 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5834
Post Likes: +7285
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
As a potential buyer very soon, I think everyone is missing a very important fact. The new G36TC will not even carry 4 adults and baggage with full fuel, and its not pressurized. It's not even on my radar. If I'm spending over $1million ( and it will be) , its going to have at least 800lbs. Payload with full fuel and be pressurized.

Whatcha gonna buy then?

Stay tuned
_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 842 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 57  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.AAI.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.