01 Dec 2025, 11:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 03 Jan 2020, 13:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/28/11 Posts: 1033 Post Likes: +380 Company: FractionalLaw.com Location: Based ABE, Allentown, PA
Aircraft: King Air 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I operate out of a 3500' strip at 1200' MSL. What is your comfort level for a 400 series for take offs/landings? My favorite Lindbergh quote: "The question is not how little runway an airplane needs, but how much it needs to operate safely." Attached is an Accelerate-Go chart for a 421C. With temps above -5C, you have to start reducing weight if you want acc-go. And if it's IMC or the departure obstacles are not easily avoidable visually, you'll need to be VERY LIGHT (about 5700# with ISA temp) to make the climb gradient if single-engine: TAKEOFF MINIMUMS: Rwy 7, std. w/ min. climb of 355' per NM to 2700. Rwy 25, std. w/ min. climb of 365' per NM to 2500.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 03 Jan 2020, 17:32 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5843 Post Likes: +7295 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Uh, who is Doug Jackson? The airport is Carroll County Airport, 4m1. It is in NW Arkansas. That would be me. I operate an RSTOL 340 from my 2,300' grass strip here in North Texas. Let me know if I can answer your questions. Call me any time: 817- nine nine 6- 7340
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 03 Jan 2020, 20:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/22/18 Posts: 487 Post Likes: +251
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Uh, who is Doug Jackson? [youtube]https://youtu.be/76rpSJAQnIM[/youtube]
Love that video. Sweet bird man!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 04 Jan 2020, 22:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/28/17 Posts: 24 Post Likes: +21
Aircraft: Cessna 180, T310R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I checked out the field. Not sure of prevailing winds but I’d guess 25 is favored based on slope and the satellite image? The satellite indicates woods to the west but the AFD only references taller obstacles well off the departure path, so the overrun is probably fine. And talk to Doug...  Thanks for checking it all out. The prevailing winds are usually out of the south, if not the south then the north. No matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind. It is best to take off on 25 downhill (terrain drops off at the end so trees are not much of a factor as far as clearing them) and land on 7. As far as the approaches they don't get you real low but Harrison, with an ILS, is 30 miles away. There is no WX reporting on the field and I don't do hard IFR real often anyway. Comparing my T310R to a 421C as to Accelerate/Go was interesting. I figured 30 degrees C at 1200 PA. My normal mission is 5 hrs. of fuel, wife, Lulu the dog and myself plus 50-75lbs. of stuff. Acc/Go in the T310R (340lbs. below gross) is about 5280', in the 421C I figured 4 hrs. of fuel (950 below gross) it is about 4130'. Of course it is something to pay attention to and be aware of, however as far as my Cessna 180, well I can't even find a A/Go chart. And yes, I will give Doug a call. Thanks for all of your inputs.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 05 Jan 2020, 03:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2932 Post Likes: +2907 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
|
|
Username Protected wrote: no matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind. How does that work again?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 05 Jan 2020, 08:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/05/09 Posts: 4480 Post Likes: +3365 Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Uh, who is Doug Jackson? [youtube]https://youtu.be/76rpSJAQnIM[/youtube]
What a fun video- nice job Doug!
_________________ "Find worthy causes in your life."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 05 Jan 2020, 11:41 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 36043 Post Likes: +14434 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: no matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind. How does that work again? A corollary to Murphy's law regarding headwinds and crosswinds might suggest that for sloped runways roughly perpendicular to the prevailing winds, the wind will be slightly behind you on a downhill takeoff and ahead on an uphill landing.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 05 Jan 2020, 12:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/28/17 Posts: 24 Post Likes: +21
Aircraft: Cessna 180, T310R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: no matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind. How does that work again?
It works like this: Look carefully at the windsock 2 or 3 times. Observe it is pretty much 90 degrees but varies a bit. Decide on runway, favoring the one that is slightly downhill, and taxi to same. Wind shifts 10 or 20 degrees from direct crosswind, usually towards the tail. If I decide to taxi to the other runway it would probably shift another 10 or 20 degrees the other way. I call it a 100 - 110 degree crosswind. Or maybe you could say a 70 to 80 degree crosswind with a 10 to 20 degree tailwind component.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421 Posted: 05 Jan 2020, 18:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 4100 Post Likes: +2837 Location: MA
Aircraft: C340A; TBM850
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 3rd question...what did you have to do to get your engines running LOP well? Was it just a matter of installed GAMI's or was it more than that? How smoothly does it run LOP? 30gph vs. 40 gph make a HUGE difference in DOC's. RAM VII for me, runs well LOP, no GAMIs either. 33", 2300 RPM, 14-15GPH depending on OAT, limited by keeping TIT below 1600. Comparative ROP setting is 29-30", 17GPH, maybe 4 kts faster.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|