banner
banner

01 Dec 2025, 11:34 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2020, 13:58 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/11
Posts: 1033
Post Likes: +380
Company: FractionalLaw.com
Location: Based ABE, Allentown, PA
Aircraft: King Air 350
Username Protected wrote:
I operate out of a 3500' strip at 1200' MSL. What is your comfort level for a 400 series for take offs/landings?


My favorite Lindbergh quote:
"The question is not how little runway an airplane needs, but how much it needs to operate safely."

Attached is an Accelerate-Go chart for a 421C. With temps above -5C, you have to start reducing weight if you want acc-go.

And if it's IMC or the departure obstacles are not easily avoidable visually, you'll need to be VERY LIGHT (about 5700# with ISA temp) to make the climb gradient if single-engine:
TAKEOFF MINIMUMS:
Rwy 7, std. w/ min. climb of 355' per NM to 2700.
Rwy 25, std. w/ min. climb of 365' per NM to 2500.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2020, 14:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12835
Post Likes: +5276
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
There are some r-stol cabin class cessnas floating around.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2020, 17:32 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/21/08
Posts: 5843
Post Likes: +7295
Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
Uh, who is Doug Jackson? The airport is Carroll County Airport, 4m1. It is in NW Arkansas.

That would be me. :D
I operate an RSTOL 340 from my 2,300' grass strip here in North Texas. Let me know if I can answer your questions.
Call me any time: 817- nine nine 6- 7340

_________________
I'm just here for the free snacks


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2020, 18:47 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13631
Post Likes: +7766
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
I checked out the field. Not sure of prevailing winds but I’d guess 25 is favored based on slope and the satellite image? The satellite indicates woods to the west but the AFD only references taller obstacles well off the departure path, so the overrun is probably fine.

The gps procedures are not the greatest when coming home in the fog.

I think it will work fine for a 400 series - especially a 421 or an rstol twin cessna.

The issue is you give up some of that twin “safety” you are paying for by operating out of there. A rejected takeoff will be less of an option when loaded up.

Enjoy. I LOVED my Golden Eagle.


And talk to Doug... :D

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2020, 20:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1982
Post Likes: +1589
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
Uh, who is Doug Jackson?

:rock: :rock:

[youtube]https://youtu.be/76rpSJAQnIM[/youtube]


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2020, 20:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/22/18
Posts: 487
Post Likes: +251
Aircraft: Cirrus SR22
Username Protected wrote:
Uh, who is Doug Jackson?

:rock: :rock:

[youtube]https://youtu.be/76rpSJAQnIM[/youtube]


Love that video. Sweet bird man!

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 04 Jan 2020, 22:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/28/17
Posts: 24
Post Likes: +21
Aircraft: Cessna 180, T310R
Username Protected wrote:
I checked out the field. Not sure of prevailing winds but I’d guess 25 is favored based on slope and the satellite image? The satellite indicates woods to the west but the AFD only references taller obstacles well off the departure path, so the overrun is probably fine.
And talk to Doug... :D


Thanks for checking it all out.
The prevailing winds are usually out of the south, if not the south then the north. No matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind. It is best to take off on 25 downhill (terrain drops off at the end so trees are not much of a factor as far as clearing them) and land on 7. As far as the approaches they don't get you real low but Harrison, with an ILS, is 30 miles away. There is no WX reporting on the field and I don't do hard IFR real often anyway.

Comparing my T310R to a 421C as to Accelerate/Go was interesting. I figured 30 degrees C at 1200 PA. My normal mission is 5 hrs. of fuel, wife, Lulu the dog and myself plus 50-75lbs. of stuff. Acc/Go in the T310R (340lbs. below gross) is about 5280', in the 421C I figured 4 hrs. of fuel (950 below gross) it is about 4130'. Of course it is something to pay attention to and be aware of, however as far as my Cessna 180, well I can't even find a A/Go chart. :crazy:

And yes, I will give Doug a call. Thanks for all of your inputs.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 03:08 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/22/12
Posts: 2932
Post Likes: +2907
Company: Retired
Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
Username Protected wrote:
no matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind.
How does that work again?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 08:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4480
Post Likes: +3365
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
Username Protected wrote:
Uh, who is Doug Jackson?

:rock: :rock:

[youtube]https://youtu.be/76rpSJAQnIM[/youtube]


What a fun video- nice job Doug!
_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 11:41 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 36043
Post Likes: +14434
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
no matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind.
How does that work again?

A corollary to Murphy's law regarding headwinds and crosswinds might suggest that for sloped runways roughly perpendicular to the prevailing winds, the wind will be slightly behind you on a downhill takeoff and ahead on an uphill landing.
_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 12:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/28/17
Posts: 24
Post Likes: +21
Aircraft: Cessna 180, T310R
Username Protected wrote:
no matter which runway I choose for take off it is at least 100 degrees off of the nose, a perpetual 100 degree crosswind.
How does that work again?


It works like this:
Look carefully at the windsock 2 or 3 times.
Observe it is pretty much 90 degrees but varies a bit.
Decide on runway, favoring the one that is slightly downhill, and taxi to same.
Wind shifts 10 or 20 degrees from direct crosswind, usually towards the tail.
If I decide to taxi to the other runway it would probably shift another 10 or 20 degrees the other way.
I call it a 100 - 110 degree crosswind. Or maybe you could say a 70 to 80 degree crosswind with a 10 to 20 degree tailwind component. :dancing:

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 16:22 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
Uh, who is Doug Jackson?

:rock: :rock:

[youtube]https://youtu.be/76rpSJAQnIM[/youtube]


Great video Doug! I absolutely love the philanthropic efforts you’re involved with. Both seem like fantastic causes and great uses of your time and bird. I would love to be able to dedicate as much of my time as you do to similar causes.

Also, what a gorgeous C340. I really enjoyed the time I spent flying a 340 but had it been in a similarly equipped bird as yours, I’m sure that experience would’ve been much different. I’m sure it was a massive effort to do all the work you had done on that bird but the results look well worth it. That STOL kit seems to make a world of difference in short field performance. I never would’ve considered operating a 340 on a 3,000 ft strip using the 340 I flew. Yours is night and day in comparison.
_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 16:57 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Doug,

If you don't mind me asking...

If someone wanted to re-create your bird as it is now: R-STOL, new interior, new paint, G500 w/ 750's with RAM VI or RAM VII engines, what would you say is a reasonable budget to acquire such a bird?

2nd question... of the limited supply of R-STOL C340's, how many are FIKI? Can you still have an R-STOL kit installed today?

3rd question...what did you have to do to get your engines running LOP well? Was it just a matter of installed GAMI's or was it more than that? How smoothly does it run LOP? 30gph vs. 40 gph make a HUGE difference in DOC's.

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 18:11 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/06/14
Posts: 4100
Post Likes: +2837
Location: MA
Aircraft: C340A; TBM850
Username Protected wrote:
3rd question...what did you have to do to get your engines running LOP well? Was it just a matter of installed GAMI's or was it more than that? How smoothly does it run LOP? 30gph vs. 40 gph make a HUGE difference in DOC's.


RAM VII for me, runs well LOP, no GAMIs either. 33", 2300 RPM, 14-15GPH depending on OAT, limited by keeping TIT below 1600. Comparative ROP setting is 29-30", 17GPH, maybe 4 kts faster.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2020, 18:42 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7444
Post Likes: +5134
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
RSTOL kits are no longer available according to the STC holder. Some parts are also no longer available.

If you have a RSTOL equipped plane just hope nothing breaks and you don’t need parts.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38  Next



Gallagher Aviation, LLC (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.avnav.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.