21 Jan 2026, 12:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 21:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Exactly! I guess I don't know what "Crandalled" means. or You didn't read the thread.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 22:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6065 Post Likes: +719 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Crandalled must mean when you invite everyone to your own town. Username Protected wrote: Exactly! I guess I don't know what "Crandalled" means. or You didn't read the thread.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 22:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/10/13 Posts: 885 Post Likes: +527 Location: Kcir
Aircraft: C90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm a potential buyer for this jet.
I fly 1-3 people most often, and it will accomodate a family for those few trips. My 421 got over, around, or under any weather I needed. This will fly as high and go much faster. It won't go under, but neither will its turboprop competitors . The airplane should be simple to operate and highly reliable.
If you use a plane for regular business transport (250+ hours annually), it has to be ready to go every time. One missed meeting could ruin your annual cost/NM.
The chute allows any of my passengers to escape if anything were to happen to me while flying.
It fits in my hangar.
I can buy $3/gas, and have fuel anywhere in the world.
I understand this plane. I also love the MU2, but it obviously has its drawbacks.
If I could make my Baron go 300kts, it would be just right. Throwing in pressure, turbine smooth and quiet, reliability, cool factor, and a chute gets you to the SF50.
Makes sense to me. Perfectly said. They're finishing up the TAT conversion for the Baron's. That airplane will haul the mail......
Michael,
Where did you get info on TAT baron?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 22:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Crandalled must mean when you invite everyone to your own town. Yeah. I think there are a few towns with the name Crandall. Probably a few with the name Bourdon too. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 22:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/10/13 Posts: 885 Post Likes: +527 Location: Kcir
Aircraft: C90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nate, heads up, Ciholas is actually Crandall disguised as an MU2 pilot go get em  
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 22:51 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 03/18/09 Posts: 1163 Post Likes: +250 Company: Elemental - Pipistrel Location: KHCR
Aircraft: Citation M2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is one thing I learned from being a long time member of the Cessna Pilots Association.
I would never ever make a bet against Mike Ciholas on anything concerning aviation!
Sincerely,
Bobby Southard That's like waving a red flag around here. I will join the other Jason's bet... It will be successful. Not an engineering marvel but successful.
_________________ -- Jason Talley Pipistrel Distributor http://www.elemental.aero
Citation M2 7GCBC Sinus Motorglider
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 22:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
|
Need to define successful?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/27/10 Posts: 10790 Post Likes: +6894 Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I offered the bet to Ciholas that if the SF50 makes it to market it would be a success. He won't bet me. Flawed bet. "If it doesn't make it to market, then no action" is like "heads I win, tails no bet". Obviously, if it gets all the way to market and sells 5 airplanes to unrelated customers, it's going to be at least a modest success. Put a time-bound on it, and make it a bet (and a loss) if it fails to make it to market by that time, and then it's a more balanced bet.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/18/10 Posts: 458 Post Likes: +114 Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
|
|
|
This thread has been the engineers arguing with the marketing guys and a little with each other.
I don't know anything about the engineering, but for whatever its worth, I agree with the marketing guy. IF the engineers deliver it will sell.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/18/10 Posts: 458 Post Likes: +114 Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I offered the bet to Ciholas that if the SF50 makes it to market it would be a success. He won't bet me. Flawed bet. "If it doesn't make it to market, then no action" is like "heads I win, tails no bet". Obviously, if it gets all the way to market and sells 5 airplanes to unrelated customers, it's going to be at least a modest success. Put a time-bound on it, and make it a bet (and a loss) if it fails to make it to market by that time, and then it's a more balanced bet.
One guy says if A then B, and another guy says not A. Why would they bet?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/27/08 Posts: 6058 Post Likes: +1031 Location: St Louis, MO
Aircraft: Out of airplane biz
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Exactly! I guess YOU don't know what "Crandalled" means. FIFY
_________________ User 963
There's no difference between those that refuse to learn and those that can't learn!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Need to define successful? They sell all that are already ordered and it becomes a pivotal part of the company. Hell, according to Ciholas it won't even make it to market.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I offered the bet to Ciholas that if the SF50 makes it to market it would be a success. He won't bet me. Flawed bet. "If it doesn't make it to market, then no action" is like "heads I win, tails no bet". Obviously, if it gets all the way to market and sells 5 airplanes to unrelated customers, it's going to be at least a modest success. Put a time-bound on it, and make it a bet (and a loss) if it fails to make it to market by that time, and then it's a more balanced bet. Not flawed at all considering Ciholas thinks it won't make it to market. He also thinks if it does it'll bankrupt the company and it's a complete waste of time and money. According to him it's a failed product.
I say the opposite will happen and I'll put $1K on it. Anyone is free to get in on this.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/27/10 Posts: 10790 Post Likes: +6894 Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Put a time-bound on it, and make it a bet (and a loss) if it fails to make it to market by that time, and then it's a more balanced bet. Not flawed at all considering Ciholas thinks it won't make it to market. He also thinks if it does it'll bankrupt the company and it's a complete waste of time and money. According to him it's a failed product. I say the opposite will happen and I'll put $1K on it. Anyone is free to get in on this. Pick the date that we'll settle the bet, and I may be interested. I'll take the other side of that, settled on 1/1/18 as a win for my side if they haven't delivered 5 fully-conforming, type-certificated airframes by that date. Whether we do it for $100 or $1K doesn't matter to me. $100 is enough to make it interesting, but I'll find a way to spend that other $900 just the same...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 Dec 2014, 23:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5340 Post Likes: +5395
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
|
Question 1 is : where do i buy Crandall sunglasses?
I got a G versus Chiolas on cirrus certifying and selling lots of cirrus jets.
You on?
Side bet on elcipse getting bought out.
Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|